Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Per Blixt


Published on

Presentation från IPv6-seminarium anordnat av PTS och .SE den 16 juni 2010.

Published in: Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Per Blixt

  1. 1. IPv6 deployment, European Commission involvement Stockholm 16 juni 2010 Per-Göran Blixt European Commission - DG INFSO Head of Unit, New Infrastructure Paradigms and Experimental Facilities ••• 1
  2. 2. A new chapter in EU history  Lisbon Treaty and the new institutional setting  New European Commission  New ambitions and priorities (Barroso II „guidelines‟, EU2020)  Enhancing economic prosperity and social cohesion  Building on 50 years of achievements  Digital Agenda is a major building block of the EU2020  A new policy framework for ICT (post i-2010)  Future Internet at the core of the Digital Agenda  Key enabler for multiple EU policies (inclusion, employment, sustainability, health, internal market, etc.) ••• 2
  3. 3. the European Digital Agenda: drivers “Fibre” Europe Research & Digital Innovation Skills Borderless Services & Sustainable Content Lifestyle Market ••• 3
  4. 4. 50 Millions left Today Data Projection ••• 4
  5. 5. ••• 5
  6. 6. Why EC involvement in IPv6 deployment? • Slow down of Internet growth • Distortion of the market • Negative effects on innovation ••• 6
  7. 7. European steps.. Focus of R&D moving from research to industrial uptake TIME R&D projects.. international cooperation… Prepare deployment IPv6 testbeds demonstrated the feasibility and the R&D projects value added. GEANT and NRENs IPV6 enable. Large scale testbeds Launching of National and EU Task Forces Dissemination New communication to the MS Policy actions Procurement European Defence Ag has IPv6 enablement in its work plan ISP Commercial offers FREE in France and others coming ••• 7 EU Action plan
  8. 8. Commission Communication to Parliament and Council on IPv6 ADVANCING THE INTERNET Action Plan for the deployment of Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6) in Europe May 2008 ••• 8
  9. 9. ACTION PLAN TARGETS • Europe should sets itself a target: at least 25% of users should be able to connect to IPv6 2010. • Cooperate with content and service providers – encourage ISP to provide IPv6 connectivity. ••• 9
  10. 10. ACTION PLAN TARGETS • IPv6 to be used by Research Projects under FP 7 whenever possible • “Europa” and “CORDIS” IPv6 accessible 2010. • Encourage Member States to use Public Procurement • Awareness campaigns intended for different users groups. ••• 10
  11. 11. ACTION PLAN TARGETS • Support of the inclusion of IPv6 on education curricula through a separate study. • Security and Privacy (S&P) issues. • Support from ENISA • Progress Review 2010 to assess the progress through separate study. ••• 11
  12. 12. Study on Security Advantages of IPv6 Planning reliability: extended lifetime compared to IPv4 Simplified and extensible address plan Standard routing (i.e. no NAT) Direct availability of secure mobility (NEMO w/ IPsec/IKE) Simplified deployment of IPsec/IKE Shortcomings/challenges of IPv6 Maturity of proposed solutions (work in progress) Scalability to be asserted (work in progress) Migration of current infrastructures (core, airports…) , planes and legacy applications Training of administrators ••• 12 17.06.2010 12
  13. 13. Study for Curricula • The objective of the IPv6 Curricula study is to analyse – the actors (offer and needs) – the processes related to the stakeholders’ training on the new Internet Protocol IPv6. • The study will permit: to establish scenarios aimed at evaluating how actions aimed at developing the IPv6 training offer would support and potentially accelerate the IPv6 adoption in Europe. • The study will be illustrated: by case studies and will be expressed through recommendations. ••• 13
  14. 14. Project IPv6 Monitoring Deployment Four main objectives: •Calculate the number of IPv6 enabled users •Conducting two specific IPv6 measurement campaigns for Europe in 2009 and 2010 •Assessing the global deployment, quality and security of current IPv6 products and services •Disseminating the results ••• 14
  15. 15. IPv6 Measured deployment from a user perspective • More than a half year of measuring unique users of IPv6… – ≈ 5 million measurements gathered, ≈ 20 websites • Some improvement in IPv6 deployment tends to be visible – Netherlands most significant data, IPv6 growth ≈0.6% ••• 15 – Smaller countries dataset increasing, but still too small
  16. 16. IPv6 Deployment Survey: 2009 RIPE APNIC 16% 17% 82% 77% IPv6 traffic is insignificant IPv6 traffic is less than IPv4 traffic IPv6 traffic is same as IPv4 traffic source: TNO/GNKS 2009 ••• 16 IPv6 traffic is greater than IPv4 traffic
  17. 17. Possible next steps…… Gather with interested stakeholders to follow up the piloting of IPv6 in relevant EU programmes. The objective will be to encourage and support the deployment of IPv6 in Member States, through activities that might include: • Show cases • Training • Exchange of best practices • Applications and services • … ••• 17
  18. 18. IPv6 piloting  Case studies in some of the more advanced Member States  Define “experiments” implementation cases (3-5) between 500.000-1000.000 € each  Define the actors who should be involved in the practical execution, …..Public authority, users, ISP, Service provider…..  Address concrete showcases, best practice, share results, benifits, problems….. ••• 18
  19. 19. Sharing of best practices across Member States involving relevant actors Aim: Piloting different real show cases Benifits, problems, experience, costs, ”cook book” for upgrades Domain-specific of case # 1 Domain-specific of case # 2 Domain-specific of case # 3 ”service ”Government ISP” ” ” ” ” ” provider training implementation CONCEPT Government NW CONCEPT Agency NW CONCEPT Company NW Pilot B will consist of 3 to 5 experiments with different settings addressing different domains. Potential domains for the pilot include for example: Government, agency, companies ••• 19
  20. 20. DG INFSO Trial Hardware setup Cable provider /IP provider/ EC infrastructure /WIFI IPv6 access point to DG INFSO. Connectivity IPV6 connectivity / EC DNS service Services Europa web site cloned on an IPV6 web server in DG INFSO Url: ••• 20
  21. 21. In conclusion • Deployment of IPv6 is not happening fast enough • Negative effects on innovation have to be avoided • Awareness, Cooperation and Piloting ••• 21
  22. 22. Tack för ordet.... ••• 22