Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Henriette Bruun How to Session at InterFace 2011


Published on

Published in: Technology, Business
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Henriette Bruun How to Session at InterFace 2011

  1. 1. How to Get Funded! Hints and Tips on How to Write a Good Application and Maximise Your Chance of Being Successful
  2. 2. Me and what I do! <ul><li>Dr Henriette Bruun, Principal School Research Facilitator </li></ul><ul><li>Funding opportunities </li></ul><ul><li>Feedback on applications </li></ul><ul><li>Feedback on response to referee reports </li></ul><ul><li>Research initiatives </li></ul><ul><li>UCL </li></ul>
  3. 3. My background <ul><li>MA, PhD </li></ul><ul><li>3 years as lecturer </li></ul><ul><li>7 years working for a funder </li></ul><ul><li>More than thousand applications </li></ul><ul><li>Thousands of referee reports </li></ul><ul><li>Funding recommendations on a couple of hundred applications </li></ul><ul><li>Funding Committee meetings </li></ul>
  4. 4. How to find out about your options? <ul><li>Your university </li></ul><ul><li>Postdoctoral Research Fellowship </li></ul><ul><li>Research Assistant </li></ul><ul><li>European Research Council </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Starting Grants </li></ul></ul>
  5. 5. What makes a good application? <ul><li>Five key criteria </li></ul><ul><ul><li>The applicant(s) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Research question/idea </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Preliminary research and project details </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Presentation/grantsmanship </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Funder, including funder’s expectations, and scheme </li></ul></ul>
  6. 6. Applying for a grant <ul><li>What do you want to do? </li></ul><ul><li>Why do you want to do it? </li></ul><ul><li>Who are interested? </li></ul>
  7. 7. Why? Who? What?
  8. 8. What to include in the Case for Support
  9. 9. How to structure a case for support <ul><li>Research project and context </li></ul><ul><ul><li>25-30% </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Methodology, sources and analysis </li></ul><ul><ul><li>60-65% </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Outputs, audiences and impact </li></ul><ul><ul><li>10% </li></ul></ul>
  10. 10. Research project and context <ul><li>What is the project about </li></ul><ul><li>Research questions(s) </li></ul><ul><li>Aims and objectives </li></ul><ul><li>Existing scholarship/field of inquiry </li></ul><ul><li>Why your project is important </li></ul>
  11. 11. Methodology, sources and analysis <ul><li>Justify case studies/comparisons to be made </li></ul><ul><li>Explain choice of sources and analysis </li></ul><ul><li>Data collection and ethics </li></ul><ul><li>Highlight specialist skills </li></ul><ul><li>Technical stuff, including ‘legacy’ </li></ul><ul><li>Copyright, IP </li></ul><ul><li>Management </li></ul><ul><li>Timetable with milestones </li></ul>
  12. 12. Dissemination: Outputs, audiences and impact <ul><li>What are the outputs </li></ul><ul><li>How and where will your research findings be disseminated </li></ul><ul><li>Who are interested and why </li></ul><ul><li>What will the impact of your research and its findings be </li></ul>
  13. 13. The application form <ul><li>Complete sections and take it seriously </li></ul><ul><li>Reverse chronological order (CV, e.g. qualifications, appointments, publications) </li></ul><ul><li>Attachments </li></ul><ul><li>Format – font, font size, margins </li></ul>
  14. 14. Technical Appendix? <ul><li>Project management of technical aspects </li></ul><ul><li>Data development methods </li></ul><ul><li>Infrastructural support </li></ul><ul><li>Data preservation and sustainability </li></ul><ul><li>Access </li></ul><ul><li>Copyright and intellectual property issues </li></ul><ul><li>Additional relevant information allowed such as Gantt charts, or additional text where character limits on the form do not allow the inclusion of sufficient information? </li></ul>
  15. 15. Presentation/grantsmanship <ul><li>Why should your application be funded? </li></ul><ul><li>Convince peer reviewers and funding committee </li></ul><ul><li>Positive and confident statements </li></ul><ul><li>Writing ‘I’ is fine </li></ul><ul><li>No typos </li></ul>
  16. 16. Presentation/grantsmanship <ul><li>Keep your audiences in mind </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Peer reviewers </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Panel members </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Funder </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Read information and follow guidelines </li></ul><ul><li>Be kind </li></ul><ul><li>No jargon </li></ul><ul><li>Get feedback </li></ul>
  17. 17. Referee reports <ul><li>Use right to reply </li></ul><ul><li>Engage with referee comments </li></ul><ul><li>Do not be defensive </li></ul><ul><li>Do not be aggressive if criticism is unfair/the referees have not understood what you want to do </li></ul><ul><li>One more chance to convince the panel why your application should be funded </li></ul><ul><li>Your reply may influence the funding decision </li></ul>
  18. 18. Common assessment criteria <ul><li>Quality of applicant and track record </li></ul><ul><li>Importance of project, dissemination and impact </li></ul><ul><li>Skills required to carry out the project </li></ul><ul><li>Appropriate institution </li></ul><ul><li>Fit to funder and scheme </li></ul><ul><li>Quality of application/grantsmanship </li></ul><ul><li>Value for money </li></ul>
  19. 19. Positions and jobs <ul><li>Junior Research Fellowships </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Offered by institutions </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Eligibility criteria vary </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Benefits vary </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Research assistants/research fellows </li></ul><ul><li>THE,, institutional websites </li></ul>
  20. 20. Dr Henriette Bruun Extension: 24840 Email: