Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Peer supported learning development of teaching skills – a Cambridge collaboration - Kirstie Preest, Isla Kuhn, Catherine Reid & Ryan Cronin

993 views

Published on

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Peer supported learning development of teaching skills – a Cambridge collaboration - Kirstie Preest, Isla Kuhn, Catherine Reid & Ryan Cronin

  1. 1. Peer Supported Learning : development of Teaching Skills a Cambridge Collaboration Kirstie Preest, Isla Kuhn, Catherine Reid, Ryan Cronin University of Cambridge LILAC March 2015
  2. 2. What we did? • Developed an in-house course which facilitated sharing of underlying teaching theory and demonstrations of best practice to aid delivery of information literacy sessions • 3 half-day sessions over a week in summer vacation • Attendees were encouraged to develop skills through their own reflection and by receiving constructive criticism after delivering a “nanoteach” session to their peers
  3. 3. Who ran the course? photos St John's College, Cambridge, chapel court 01 by Sailko is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 Murray Edwards College Library Lucy Cavendish College Library
  4. 4. Where the need came from? http://www.slideshare.net/infolit_group/cohen
  5. 5. Who could attend?
  6. 6. Session 1 ● How confident are we as teachers? ● Who are our students? ● Information literacy ● Lesson planning
  7. 7. Session 2 ● Teaching resources (handouts) ● Peer review & constructive feedback (reflective practice) ● Teaching demo ● Avoiding disasters Plus : Teaching Audit
  8. 8. Session 3 (nano teach) ● Nanoteach ● Peer review ● Self review ● How confident are you now?
  9. 9. 7 months later ● Survey ● Brown Bag lunch ● Successes and challenges
  10. 10. How we measured impact Self-rating of confidence: Pre, Post and 7 months later
  11. 11. Changes in confidence level: summary If you started with high confidence, you stayed confident 4.6% average improvement from start to 7 months later If you started with middling confidence, your confidence improved 26% average improvement from start to 7 months later If you started with low confidence, your confidence improved massively 328% average improvement from start to 7 months later
  12. 12. Did anything change? every time I have to teach/present, I remember about the course (especially the nano-teach session) and I say to myself: "I can do it - and do it properly!". Which is definitely a long-term increase in confidence. The structure of the portfolio course was roughly the same as ever, but I added a powerpoint presentation and an activity for participants. Yes! The course gave me the confidence to really focus on what I needed to say at the points where I had the opportunity, and thus to leave out what would only become relevant later. I prepared handouts with information to take away. I also thought more about students with different abilities eg. printing handouts on different colour paper I used the mini teach I delivered at the training last year to help me plan my MSt eresources session - and ensuring I got the students involved in the session.
  13. 13. Reflection: what participants suggested ● Provide constructive feedback ourselves for participants ● more time for planning nanoteach ● less post-it notes! ● Include more discussion time for participants to exchange ideas/tips
  14. 14. What next? ● Summer 2015 ○ re-run course (with peer reviewed real-life teaching) ● development of shared teaching resources ● Encourage staff to gain formal teaching accreditation (e.g. HEA) ● Run programme at regional level?
  15. 15. Kirstie Preest, Murray Edwards College @kirstiewales http://seshatscribe.blogspot.co.uk/ for blog posts on this course Isla Kuhn, Medical Library @ilk21 Catherine Reid, Clare College @CatherineAReid Ryan Cronin, St John’s College With thanks to: Jo Harcus, Lucy Cavendish College; Libby Tilley, English Faculty Library; and Meg Westbury, Wolfson College
  16. 16. References Cohen, S. (2012), The missing link: librarians and the teaching identity . Presentation at LILAC 2012 http://www.slideshare.net/infolit_group/cohen [Accessed: 7th April 2015] Secker, J. and Coonan, E. (2014) A New Curriculum for Information Literacy. Available at: http://newcurriculum.wordpress.com/ [Accessed: 7th April 2015] Tilley, L. and Murphy, H., University of Cambridge (2015), Let me tell you a story….Presentation at LILAC 2015, 9th April 2015 http://www.lilacconference.com/WP/programme/abstracts-day-2#tilley [Accessed: 7th April 2015]

×