METHODS OF GAINING SPACE.
EXTRACTIONS

INDIAN DENTAL ACADEMY
Leader in continuing dental education
www.indiandentalacademy...
To Extract Or Not To Extract? Over 100yrs.
•
•
•
•

Align the teeth

Orthodontics:
Camouflage.
Other alternativeOpinions r...
The Pre 1900 era:
• Extraction: always been challenged.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Late 1700s, early 1800s.
By late 1800s-Kinsley- jud...
The great extraction controversy of
the 1920s:
Edward Angle - normal occlusion. (1899).Facial
esthetics and stability pote...
1902 article,
“My belief is that if we would confer the greatest

benefits upon our patients from an esthetic
stand point,...
• Influenced by Wolf.
• Led Angle to 2 key concepts:

• Skeletal growth influenced by external pressure.
• Rubber bands- o...
The extraction debate of 1911
• Question of extraction in orthodontia.- AJO 1964
• New School: Angle.
• Rationale School: ...
Bimax protrusion: nearly ideal occlusion
extraction mandatory to improve profile.
Retreated a case, after waiting to see i...
Dewey:
Ex of Negroes.
Extraction of 4 – molars moved mesial, incisors
proclined.
“Angle was not a man to compromise with h...
Response of Calvin Case:
“Extraction never resorted until certain that
developing growth of other parts will not correct t...
•Angle & his followers won the debate with
Case.
•With passing of time,& successful treatment of
many ext cases have shown...
Reintroduction of extraction in midcentury:
By, 1930’s relapse frequently seen.

Charles Tweed: retreated 100 of his patie...
Search for stability:
3yrs – devoted to study.
Mandibular incisors upright.

Margolis.
Retreated by Xn of 4s.
Results much...
Tweed: “ it is my opinion that it is necessary to remove
dental units in all those cases where there exists a
discrepancy ...
Recent trend towards non extraction:
Indiscriminate use of extractions.
Ortho Rx synonymous with extractions.
Later critic...
Litigation: 1980s
TMD problems.

Witzig and Spahl- critical of bicuspid Xn.
•Distalization of mandible;
•Post displacement...
•Gianelly et all – position of the condyle in the fossa
(12 Cl II)
•Hesitant. Trend towards non extraction..
•Swing of the...
A contemporary perspective:
recommendations for expansion Vs
extractions:
Flat lips

esthetics

Full lips

Either acceptab...
Contemporary extraction
guidelines:
For ortho Xn in Class I crowding &/protrusion:
•Less than 4mm- Xn rarely indicated.(se...
Thank you
For more details please visit
www.indiandentalacademy.com

www.indiandentalacademy.com
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Methods of gaining space- extractions /certified fixed orthodontic courses by Indian dental academy

400 views

Published on


The Indian Dental Academy is the Leader in continuing dental education , training dentists in all aspects of dentistry and offering a wide range of dental certified courses in different formats.

Indian dental academy provides dental crown & Bridge,rotary endodontics,fixed orthodontics,
Dental implants courses.for details pls visit www.indiandentalacademy.com ,or call
0091-9248678078

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
400
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
4
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Rousseau emphasized the perfectibility of man.
  • Methods of gaining space- extractions /certified fixed orthodontic courses by Indian dental academy

    1. 1. METHODS OF GAINING SPACE. EXTRACTIONS INDIAN DENTAL ACADEMY Leader in continuing dental education www.indiandentalacademy.com www.indiandentalacademy.com www.indiandentalacademy.com
    2. 2. To Extract Or Not To Extract? Over 100yrs. • • • • Align the teeth Orthodontics: Camouflage. Other alternativeOpinions remarkably changed. Chart. www.indiandentalacademy.com www.indiandentalacademy.com
    3. 3. The Pre 1900 era: • Extraction: always been challenged. • • • • • • • Late 1700s, early 1800s. By late 1800s-Kinsley- judicious to extract. Edward Hartley Angle:systematized and organized. Suggested extractions in earlier works.(1887). By 1907, strongly opposed extractions. His dogmatic views dominated for next 30yrs. Extraction – crime. Odontocides www.indiandentalacademy.com www.indiandentalacademy.com
    4. 4. The great extraction controversy of the 1920s: Edward Angle - normal occlusion. (1899).Facial esthetics and stability potential complications. Rousseau-imperfections of modern man related to negative influence of civilization and that man could reach perfection with correct efforts.. •Inappropriate to extract, inherently capable of having a perfect dentition.( Article of faith) •Every person had potential for an ideal relationship of all 32 teeth. extraction never needed. •Skeletal elements-accommodate teeth. www.indiandentalacademy.com www.indiandentalacademy.com
    5. 5. 1902 article, “My belief is that if we would confer the greatest benefits upon our patients from an esthetic stand point, we must work hand in hand with nature and assist her to establish the relations of the teeth as the Creator intended they should be,& not resort to mutilation”. Prof. Edmund Wuerpel – led to his concepts of facial beauty and harmony. www.indiandentalacademy.com www.indiandentalacademy.com
    6. 6. • Influenced by Wolf. • Led Angle to 2 key concepts: • Skeletal growth influenced by external pressure. • Rubber bands- overcome improper jaw relationship. • Proper function of dentition key to maintaining teeth in their correct position. – “Bone growing appliance” • Relapse: failure to achieve proper occlusion. (article of faith) • Concepts challenged by Calvin Case. “although arches could be expanded,teeth aligned, neither esthetics nor stability would be satisfactory in the long term” • Widely publicized debate – Dewey and Case. www.indiandentalacademy.com www.indiandentalacademy.com
    7. 7. The extraction debate of 1911 • Question of extraction in orthodontia.- AJO 1964 • New School: Angle. • Rationale School: Case. • Angle- causes of malocclusion – ‘local’ • Case- based on laws of heredity- union of dissimilar types/propagation of variations • Buccal occlusion gives no indication of the real position of dentition in relation to facial outlines. www.indiandentalacademy.com www.indiandentalacademy.com
    8. 8. Bimax protrusion: nearly ideal occlusion extraction mandatory to improve profile. Retreated a case, after waiting to see if developing growth would harmonize the relations. Angle’s Class II : Angle’s Class III : extraction is a must. “New bone cannot be induced to grow beyond its inherent size and that ,.’. there are indications for extraction in certain forms of malocclusion” www.indiandentalacademy.com www.indiandentalacademy.com
    9. 9. Dewey: Ex of Negroes. Extraction of 4 – molars moved mesial, incisors proclined. “Angle was not a man to compromise with his ideals. He had to put a good fight to offset extremism in extraction, and what he said needed to be said” Leonard Bernstein- 6th edition of Angle’s book. Folk lore www.indiandentalacademy.com www.indiandentalacademy.com
    10. 10. Response of Calvin Case: “Extraction never resorted until certain that developing growth of other parts will not correct the dento-facial protrusion” All experienced orthodontists……. Sum up, “it seems a most senseless thing for men to fight over, when the truth is so evident; www.indiandentalacademy.com www.indiandentalacademy.com
    11. 11. •Angle & his followers won the debate with Case. •With passing of time,& successful treatment of many ext cases have shown that Case was more accurate in assessing the issue. •Extraction disappeared b/w world war I and II. www.indiandentalacademy.com www.indiandentalacademy.com
    12. 12. Reintroduction of extraction in midcentury: By, 1930’s relapse frequently seen. Charles Tweed: retreated 100 of his patients. 6 ½ yrs – philosophy of full complement of teeth. 11yrs otherwise. 70% recalled. Success rate less than 20% Stability of end result. Healthy investing tissues- longevity Masticatory efficiency. Good facial esthetics. •Findings came as a shock. www.indiandentalacademy.com www.indiandentalacademy.com
    13. 13. Search for stability: 3yrs – devoted to study. Mandibular incisors upright. Margolis. Retreated by Xn of 4s. Results much more stable. 1st paper published 1936. By 1940- all 100 cases. www.indiandentalacademy.com www.indiandentalacademy.com
    14. 14. Tweed: “ it is my opinion that it is necessary to remove dental units in all those cases where there exists a discrepancy b/w tooth structure and basal bone.” Raymond Begg: Attritional occlusion theory; lack of proximal wear. “Tooth extraction as an aid to orthodontic treatment is scientifically correct ‘.’ it simulates the natural loss of tooth substance by attrition”. By late 1940’s extraction treatment became more widely accepted. By early 1960’s more than half of American patientsextraction. www.indiandentalacademy.com www.indiandentalacademy.com
    15. 15. Recent trend towards non extraction: Indiscriminate use of extractions. Ortho Rx synonymous with extractions. Later criticized Arguments continued throughout 1960s Prefer fuller and more prominent lips than std of 1950s and 1960s. www.indiandentalacademy.com www.indiandentalacademy.com
    16. 16. Litigation: 1980s TMD problems. Witzig and Spahl- critical of bicuspid Xn. •Distalization of mandible; •Post displacement of condyles and TMDs •Recommended 7 Xn. •Studies concerning 4 Xn and TMDs. •Jason and Hasund (Norway) 60 patients •Dibbets Van der Weele (1991) 15 y study. •No relation b/w choice of Xn , type of teeth , TMD . www.indiandentalacademy.com www.indiandentalacademy.com
    17. 17. •Gianelly et all – position of the condyle in the fossa (12 Cl II) •Hesitant. Trend towards non extraction.. •Swing of the pendulum. www.indiandentalacademy.com www.indiandentalacademy.com
    18. 18. A contemporary perspective: recommendations for expansion Vs extractions: Flat lips esthetics Full lips Either acceptable More stable? stability Less stable? Either acceptable extraction Non extraction www.indiandentalacademy.com www.indiandentalacademy.com
    19. 19. Contemporary extraction guidelines: For ortho Xn in Class I crowding &/protrusion: •Less than 4mm- Xn rarely indicated.(severe incisor protrusion or a severe vertical discrepancy) •5-9mm: both;depends •Hard and soft tissue characteristics. •Final position of incisors. •10mm/more: Xn almost always. www.indiandentalacademy.com www.indiandentalacademy.com
    20. 20. Thank you For more details please visit www.indiandentalacademy.com www.indiandentalacademy.com

    ×