Public sphere
Habermas:
A democratic political culture where people can, outside
state’s supervision, have critical debates and can reason
freely
Succes depends on
Equality
Can everyone access it?
Does everyone have a vote?
Effective deliberation and discussion
(‘procedures of open discussion aimed at achieving
rationality motivated consensus’, Dahlgren, 2006)
Critique
Not very democratic at all….
Exclusion of everyone but white bourgeois males
(Garnham, 1992)
If only 100 people were on twitter
Source: http://www.sysomos.com/ (Picture from: Visualized, the
Information Atlas (not yet published), www.visualizedthebook.com)
Twitter study (1)
Source: http://www.pearanalytics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Twitter-
Study-August-2009.pdf
Twitter study (2)
Source: http://www.pearanalytics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Twitter-
Study-August-2009.pdf
So, ís twitter the ideal place to
have critical debate and
discussion? (1)
Equality +
Accesibility +/-
Everyone has a voice +
Limited space (140 characters) -
So, ís twitter the ideal place to
have critical debate and
discussion? (2)
Possible to interact (‘@’) +
Most topics not serious (‘pointless blabber’) -
People do not always comment on each other -
Really outside state supervision? -
But
Only a minority uses twitter to discuss the news
Mostly short statements, not
a lot of reactions, no real
interaction
A lot of politicians
Not always serious
Conclusion
Twitter has elements of a public sphere
But, 140 characters are too short for effective
deliberation and discussion
Most of tweets not serious
Most twitter users do not interact