Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Opportunites for linking agriculture and nutrition - Marie Ruel


Published on

IFPRI Policy Seminar 'Linking Agriculture, Health and Nutrition' dated 7th Dec, 2010, Washington D.C.

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

Opportunites for linking agriculture and nutrition - Marie Ruel

  1. 1. Photo: One Acre Fund<br />What are the opportunities for linking agriculture and nutrition?<br />Marie Ruel (IFPRI)<br />IFPRI, December 7, 2010<br />
  2. 2. AGRICULTURE – NUTRITION - HEALTH<br />AGRICULTURE BENEFITS NUTRITION + HEALTH THROUGH:<br />HEALTH & NUTRITION<br />BENEFITS AGRICULTURE THROUGH:<br />Productivity<br />Livelihoods<br />Agriculture<br />Income<br />Risk taking<br />Employment<br />Education<br />Food security<br />Nutrition<br />Cognition<br />Dietary diversity<br />Endurance<br />Gender equity<br />AGRICULTURE POSES<br />RISKS:<br />Physical strength<br />Health<br />Water-related diseases<br />Food-borne diseases<br />Zoonotic diseases<br />
  3. 3. Agriculture is Essential but Insufficient to Improve Nutrition<br />
  4. 4. 4<br />National nutrition outcomes<br />Policy drivers of growth: Green Revolution in 1970s & 1980s, “liberalization” & nonfarm economic growth in 1990s & 2000s.<br />Food output<br />Food imports<br />Sectoral linkages<br />Supply side effects<br />Food <br />prices<br />Nonfood output<br />Demand side effects<br />National Level<br />Household Level<br />Individual Level<br />Household assets and livelihoods<br />Food income: consumption<br />Nutrient consumption<br />Food expenditure<br />Nutrient intake<br />Child nutrition outcomes<br />Food income: from markets<br />Health care expenditure <br />Health status<br />Non-food expenditure<br />Non-food income<br />Mother’s nutrition outcomes<br />Caring capacity & practices <br />Female employment <br />Farm/nonfarm employment<br />Female energy expenditure<br />Drivers of “taste”: culture, location, growth, globalization.<br />Intrahousehold inequality: gender bias, education, family size, seasonality, religion, SCTs.<br />Public health factors: water, sanitation, health services, education.<br />Interhousehold inequality in assets, credit, access to public goods & services <br />Interacting socioeconomic factors<br />[possible leakages]<br />Policy drivers of inequality: land policies, financial policies, infrastructure investments, education policies, empowerment policies for women & SCTs.<br />Policy drivers of nutrition: health, nutrition, social protection & education<br />Pathways from Agriculture to Nutrition (TANDI) <br />
  5. 5. Weak relationship between agriculture performance and nutrition status outcomes<br />Estimated elasticities between child undernutrition and welfare indicators<br />
  6. 6. What are the Opportunities? <br />3 Examples:<br /><ul><li>Biofortification
  7. 7. Homestead food production programs, which bring agriculture-health-nutrition together at community and household level
  8. 8. Nutrition-sensitive value chains</li></li></ul><li>Photo: Julie Ruel-Bergeron<br />Biofortification for Improved Nutrition<br />
  9. 9. OFSP in Mozambique and Uganda(HarvestPlus)<br /><ul><li>Impact evaluation: randomized trial of 1st HarvestPlus crop
  10. 10. Intervention:
  11. 11. Seed systems (dissemination of vines, farmers’ training)
  12. 12. Demand creation (nutrition education)
  13. 13. Marketing and product development
  14. 14. Reached 14,000 hh in Mozambique; 10,000 in Uganda
  15. 15. Dissemination: 2006-09</li></ul>Source: Dan Gilligan et al. ; Biofortification Conference, Nov 2010<br />
  16. 16. Impact on OFSP Adoption Rate, 2009 Mozambique<br />69% compared to control<br />% who retained OFSP vines for next season<br />Source: Dan Gilligan et al. ; Biofortification Conference, Nov 2010<br />
  17. 17. Agriculture Programs to Improve Nutrition<br />Photo: One Acre Fund<br />
  18. 18. HKI’s Homestead food production in Bangladesh<br />Helen Keller International<br />Integrating agriculture and nutrition<br />at household and community level<br /> Program: <br /><ul><li>Production-focused: micronutrient-rich vegetables, small livestock production
  19. 19. Nutrition education to promote consumption
  20. 20. Focus on women: income generation, empowerment
  21. 21. Nutrition objective: Improve diet diversity, micronutrient intake
  22. 22. Impact:
  23. 23. Triple vegetable production; increased income
  24. 24. 73% of gardens managed by women
  25. 25. improved food security for 5 million people
  26. 26. :</li></ul>Source: Millions Fed , IFPRI, 2009;<br />
  27. 27. Evidence of impact on maternal & child nutrition is limited<br />Helen Keller International<br />Areas for improvement:<br /><ul><li>Stronger, better targeted BCC
  28. 28. Focus on the 1000 days
  29. 29. Stronger links to health systems
  30. 30. More rigorous theory-based impact</li></ul> evaluation <br /><ul><li>Systematic documentation of lessons learned
  31. 31. :</li></ul>Source: Millions Fed , IFPRI, 2009;<br />
  32. 32. Nutrition-Sensitive Value Chains<br />Photo: Andrew Westby<br />
  33. 33. Example of bean value chains in Uganda and Rwanda (Dry Grain Pulses CRSP, Mazur et al. 2009)<br />4 objectives:<br /><ul><li>Improve yields and quality of harvested beans
  34. 34. Enhance nutritional value and appeal through appropriate post-harvest handling + processing
  35. 35. Increase market access
  36. 36. Increase demand and consumption</li></li></ul><li>A Nutrition-Sensitive Value Chain for Beans (Uganda)<br />Value Chain Steps<br />Activities<br />Inputs into production<br />Field trials with new varieties<br />Soil & terrain analysis<br />Farmers trainings<br />Production<br />Technologies to  losses (insects)<br />Nutrient retention analysis <br />Post-harvest handling/storage<br />Testing sequencing + duration of<br />different processing techniques<br />(nutrient retention, anti-nutrients)<br />Processing<br />Analysis of main market channels,<br />Drivers of market decisions,<br />Presence of nutrient-enhanced foods<br />Marketing<br />Increased availability of, access to, and demand for<br /> NUTRITIOUS BEANS<br />Consumer surveys<br />Cooking trainings, Education,<br />Behavior chance communications<br />Source: Adapted from Mazur et al. 2009. Pulses CRSP <br />
  37. 37. Conclusions<br /><ul><li>Agriculture alone will not improve nutrition fast enough
  38. 38. We have opportunities and examples of success on how to bridge the agriculture-nutrition divide
  39. 39. We have challenges
  40. 40. Our biggest challenge AND opportunity is to work together - cross-sectorally (how?)
  41. 41. And we need to do much better at documenting successes – and failures; we need the evidence
  42. 42. We have a momentum, global consensus, new initiatives, committed donors, experienced NGOs, research community</li>