Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Gabriele Koehler SDL Lecture PowerPoint: Part 1

1,097 views

Published on

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Gabriele Koehler SDL Lecture PowerPoint: Part 1

  1. 1.   Some new trends in development cooperation – nightmares and dreams? Gabriele Köhler Visiting Fellow, Vulnerability and Poverty Reduction Team, IDS, Sussex IDS Sussex Sussex development lecture Brighton, 12 May 2011
  2. 2. Overview: <ul><li>1) Where are we? </li></ul><ul><ul><li>poverty, exclusion, acute crises </li></ul></ul><ul><li>2) Evolution of the development cooperation architecture </li></ul><ul><ul><li>six phases </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>3) Nightmares and dreams </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>resulting from the „bipolar“ architecture </li></ul></ul><ul><li>4) The case for a bold vision </li></ul><ul><ul><li>rights-based, universalist, transformative </li></ul></ul>
  3. 3. Where are we? human development &income poverty <ul><li>Human development at aggregate level: </li></ul><ul><li>slow but steady improvement </li></ul>
  4. 4. Where are we? human development &income poverty <ul><li>Absolute number and share of extremely poor people has declined since 1990 globally </li></ul>
  5. 5. Where are we? Income poverty & human development <ul><li>But: number of extremely poor in Africa and South Asia increased </li></ul><ul><ul><li>using $1.25 per personday income poverty measure </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Number of poor and vulnerable people : </li></ul><ul><ul><li>2.5 billion persons </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>using $2 per personday income poverty measure </li></ul></ul>
  6. 6. Where are we? Systemic social exclusions & intersecting inequalities in North and South <ul><li>Economic inequalities </li></ul><ul><li>Social inequalities </li></ul><ul><li>Gender and age inequalities </li></ul><ul><li>Spatial inequalities </li></ul><ul><li>Political inequalities </li></ul>
  7. 7. Where are we? Economic, fiscal, climate crises <ul><li>at least 100 million more people hungry and undernourished </li></ul><ul><li>an estimated 64 million more people in income poverty </li></ul><ul><li>205 million people unemployed </li></ul><ul><li>at least 55,000 more children likely to die each year from 2009 to 2015 </li></ul><ul><li>175 million children affected by climate change </li></ul>
  8. 8. Where are we? Converging North and South <ul><li>MDG outcomes worst among socially excluded groups – in North and South </li></ul><ul><li>Income gap widening </li></ul><ul><li>Human development gap widening within countries </li></ul>
  9. 9. Evolution of development architecture Phase I: Colonial administration (1900s – 1950s) <ul><li>Predominant ideology: </li></ul><ul><li>Spreading „progress“ and „civilisation“ </li></ul><ul><li>Driving forces: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Colonial regimes for economic gain </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Colonial regimes for resources </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Colonial regimes for power </li></ul></ul>
  10. 10. Evolution of development architecture Phase II: Independence movements & „development aid“ (1960-1980) <ul><ul><li>Predominant ideology: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Transfer capital and technology to the capital-deficient South – economistic approach to development </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Keynesian economics </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>State led growth </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Driving forces: </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>independence movements in the South </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>post-war recovery, affluence, guilt in the North – </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Re- nascent globalisation </li></ul></ul></ul>
  11. 11. Evolution of development architecture Phase III: structural adjustment (1980s – 1989/1990 and beyond) <ul><ul><li>Predominant ideology: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Overstating role of marktes, downplaying the role of the state, intervening in developing country governments‘ policy space </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Driving forces: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Economic and political strength of the developed countries </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Interest in „South“ for markets, production – global value chains </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Debt crisis in the South </li></ul></ul>
  12. 12. Evolution of development architecture Phase IV: Cooperation as “partnerships” (1990s – 2000) <ul><ul><li>Predominant ideology: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>End of the „cold war“ : rebalancing of power </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Seeming collapse of state-led development </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Series of UN global summits - </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Social development theme </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Driving forces: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>greater economic dependence of the North on the South </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Emerging South North trade and investment </li></ul></ul>
  13. 13. Evolution of development architecture Phase V: MDGs; Aid Effectiveness (2000 – 2008) <ul><ul><li>Predominant ideologies: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>push for human development </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>focus on social development – different from economistic approaches of the 1960s </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>development onus on the South </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>the „bad governance“ discourse </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Driving forces: economic & political polarisation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Stalled progress on human development; </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Slow economic growth – or jobless growth; </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Multiple social exclusions; </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Accelerating domestic conflicts; </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Climate change and accelerating frequency of disasters </li></ul></ul></ul>
  14. 15. Evolution of development architecture Phase VI: Bipolar development since 2008 <ul><ul><li>Drivers </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Emerging BRIC(S) donors with export success, outward investment, sovereign funds </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>G-20, pushing „G-192“ aside </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>New bilateral donors changing the donor landscape </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Private foundations - more grants available </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Predominant ideology </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>“ Pluri-pragmatism” </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>One size fits all versus national ownership & policy space </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Growth and human development </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Overemphasis on evidence based policy-making versus analytical and policy debates </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>versus grand design and visions of social justice </li></ul></ul></ul></ul>
  15. 16. s Countries of the world estimated GDP in purchasing power parity, 2010

×