Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Presentation, ICEM-SIIE, Aveiro 2011

547 views

Published on

on-line tutoring; collaborative critical thinking

Published in: Education, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Presentation, ICEM-SIIE, Aveiro 2011

  1. 1. Idalina Jorge - ifjorge@ie.ul.pt<br />1<br />28-09-2011<br />
  2. 2. Research goals<br />Idalina Jorge - ifjorge@ie.ul.pt<br />2<br />Association – types & levels<br />28-09-2011<br />
  3. 3. The context and the research material<br />Idalina Jorge - ifjorge@ie.ul.pt<br />3<br />28-09-2011<br />
  4. 4. Variable 1- The tutor’s intervention <br />Idalina Jorge - ifjorge@ie.ul.pt<br />4<br />11 indicators of the tutor’s intervention<br />28-09-2011<br />
  5. 5. Variable 1- Thetutor’s intervention <br />Idalina Jorge - ifjorge@ie.ul.pt<br />5<br />28-09-2011<br />
  6. 6. Variable 2 - collaborative critical thing <br />Idalina Jorge - ifjorge@ie.ul.pt<br />6<br />28-09-2011<br />
  7. 7. Unitsofanalysis<br />Idalina Jorge - ifjorge@ie.ul.pt<br />7<br />28-09-2011<br />
  8. 8. Procedures(1)<br />Idalina Jorge - ifjorge@ie.ul.pt<br />8<br />The messages were kept in their chronological order<br />All the categories were progressively refined<br />A stable protocol established<br />The complete sequences of the 40 forums were delivered to two intercoders for each variable<br />Discussions with intercoders<br />28-09-2011<br />
  9. 9. Procedures (2)<br />Idalina Jorge - ifjorge@ie.ul.pt<br />9<br />Intercoding stability measured with Cohen’s Kappa<br />A Cramer’s V post-test to assess the effect of the tutor’s posts on the highest levels of collaborative critical thinking<br />28-09-2011<br />
  10. 10. The tutor’s tasks & the students highest levels of critical thinking<br />Idalina Jorge - ifjorge@ie.ul.pt<br />10<br />Cramer’s V Associations >0.400 <br />28-09-2011<br />
  11. 11. Conclusions & Suggestions (1)<br />Idalina Jorge - ifjorge@ie.ul.pt<br />11<br />The results provide some clues on how the tutors should structure the triggering messages.<br />The students value and respond positively to the tutor’s teaching and organizingtasks.<br />The tutors must pay careful attention: <br />to the discussion progression, <br />to the flow of ideas from one post to another, <br />To the core messages, since new developments tend to arise around them. <br />28-09-2011<br />
  12. 12. Conclusions & Suggestions (2)<br />Idalina Jorge - ifjorge@ie.ul.pt<br />12<br />The students value the tutor’s presence throughout the dialogue, particularly in the integration phase.<br />The tutor must explicitly ask for partial or comprehensive synthesis<br />Needed: a taxonomy of open questions which lead the dialogue to its highest cognitive levels (already suggested: Jorge, 2011)<br />The forum technological aspects can be improved (self-regulation devices).<br />28-09-2011<br />
  13. 13. Idalina Jorge<br />Instituto de Educação, <br />Universidade de Lisboa<br />Idalina Jorge - ifjorge@ie.ul.pt<br />13<br />ThankYou!<br />28-09-2011<br />
  14. 14. Idalina Jorge<br />Instituto de Educação, <br />Universidade de Lisboa<br />Idalina Jorge - ifjorge@ie.ul.pt<br />14<br />ThankYou!<br />28-09-2011<br />
  15. 15. Idalina Jorge - ifjorge@ie.ul.pt<br />28-09-2011<br />15<br />

×