Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Rina acc-icc16-stein


Published on

RINA Aggregate Congestion Control presentation for IEEE ICC 2016

Published in: Internet
  • Login to see the comments

  • Be the first to like this

Rina acc-icc16-stein

  1. 1. Congestion Control in the Recursive InterNetworking Architecture (RINA) Presenter: Stein Gjessing Authors: Peyman Teymoori, Michael Welzl, Stein Gjessing, UiO, Norway Eduard Grasa, i2CAT, Spain Roberto Riggio, Kewin Rausch, Domenico Siracusa, CREATE-NET, Italy May 24, 2016
  2. 2. 2 Congestion Control in the Internet •  Problems with the Internet: –  TCP scalability with: •  The diameter of the network •  The number of flows •  The bottleneck link capacity –  Split-TCP (PEPs): •  IPsec and SSL •  Scalability with the number of flows •  Processing delay at splitters •  This presentation: Highlighting RINA Congestion Control (CC) benefits Showing that improvements that have been done to TCP on the internet "naturally appear" with RINA without their side effects PEP: Performance Enhancing Proxy
  3. 3. 3 Recursive InterNetworking Architecture (RINA) •  A back to basics approach learning from the experience with TCP/IP •  In RINA, every layer (called a “Distributed InterProcess Communication (IPC) Facility” (DIF)) has the same set of mechanisms and goal: –  providing and managing the communication among its entities •  Behaviour is defined by “policies” that can be programmed differently in various DIFs.
  4. 4. 4 Some DIF Configurations in RINA •  Two possible RINA stack configurations by different organizations of “Distributed InterProcessCommunication Facilities” (DIFs)
  5. 5. 5 Implementation – the general scheme •  Aggregate Congestion Control (ACC) “Error and Flow Control Protocol” (EFCP), “Relaying and Multiplexing Task” (RMT), “Resource Allocation” (RA).
  6. 6. 6 Horizontal: Consecutive DIFs Topology: Results:
  7. 7. 7 Vertical: Stacked DIFs Topology: Results: 1 sender, 1 receiver: Sender sends flow 1 (large) at 0, and flow 2 (small) at time 10.
  8. 8. 8 Around: In-Network Resource Pooling •  A follow-up to: Psaras, Ioannis, Lorenzo Saino, and George Pavlou. "Revisiting Resource Pooling: The Case for In-Network Resource Sharing." Proceedings of the 13th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks. ACM, 2014 •  Easily implementable in RINA by an RMT routing policy S1 S2 R1 R2 Router1 Router3 Router2 Router4 10 Mbps 10 Mbps 2 Mbps 3 Mbps 3 Mbps 10 Mbps 10 Mbps 10 Mbps local stability, global fairness (1:1) Result: Jain’s fairness index for the two flows was 0.999, which shows global fairness while local stability was provided through RINA-ACC
  9. 9. 9 Discussion •  RINA can solve the Internet problems by –  breaking up the long control loop into shorter ones, –  controlling flow aggregates inside the network, and –  enabling the deployment of arbitrary congestion control mechanisms per DIF.
  10. 10. 10 Future work •  how to effectively manage buffers between DIFs, •  which hop-by-hop congestion controllers are best to use, given their stability and scalability properties, •  how to best apply in-network resource pooling, •  effects of different congestion control policies at lower DIFs on congestion control policies of upper DIFs, and •  how large a DIF can be without performance degradation, and how its scalability can be improved.
  11. 11. 11 Thank you! Questions?