Cadre 2007 Sept

575 views

Published on

Cadre 2007

Published in: Education, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Cadre 2007 Sept

  1. 1. 2007 September Cadre Data Analysis for School Improvement Carol Hailey, Language Arts Resource Specialist Deborah Schluben, Math Resource Specialist Bob Winkler, Director of Assessment & Research
  2. 2. Current AYP Results <ul><li>The district attained AYP. </li></ul>
  3. 3. Percentage of Schools Attaining AYP in 2007 Note: The 2007 results will be released in September.
  4. 4. READING- % Meets Standard or Higher All Students (3-HS) Target 07 (65%) Target 08 (72%)
  5. 5. MATH - % Meets Standard or Higher All Students (3-HS) Target 07 (55.7%) Target 08 (64.6%)
  6. 8. Reading Questions and Answer Stems (Human Reader) <ul><li>Groups of NOT MORE THAN three students are possible. </li></ul><ul><li>Principal must apply to use the group process by February 15. </li></ul><ul><li>No CD’s will be used. Only human readers will be used. </li></ul><ul><li>This is a draft policy. </li></ul>
  7. 9. Reading Questions and Answer Stems (Human Reader) <ul><li>The passage on the reading assessment may never be read to a student. </li></ul><ul><li>If a student needs a read-aloud accommodation , this must be documented in an IEP, 504 plan, ELL plan, or Student Improvement Plan. </li></ul><ul><li>A read-aloud accommodation is defined as reading the entire test (except the reading passage) to a student. </li></ul>
  8. 10. Reading Questions and Answer Stems (Human Reader) <ul><li>Practices such as pronouncing a single word, a single distracter, a single stem, or a single question should be considered acceptable assessment practice, requiring no special documentation and no special coding of the answer sheet. </li></ul><ul><li>Nothing from the reading passage may be read or pronounced, including single words. </li></ul>
  9. 11. Reading Questions and Answer Stems (Human Reader) <ul><li>Students may use the KCA audio only if the accommodation is coded and is a regular classroom practice. </li></ul>
  10. 12. Accommodations Never Allowed <ul><li>Reading the reading passage to students </li></ul><ul><li>Use of calculator on non-calculator portions of assessment </li></ul><ul><li>Teacher / student–generated math journals </li></ul>
  11. 13. Accommodations Never Allowed <ul><li>Teacher reminders to students about processes to use when testing. </li></ul><ul><li>Textbooks, dictionaries, computation tables and other curricular materials (word walls, vocabulary charts, flash cards, etc.) </li></ul>
  12. 14. Identifying At-Risk Students <ul><li>MAP assessment </li></ul><ul><li>Previous state assessment </li></ul><ul><li>At-risk spreadsheet </li></ul>
  13. 15. Correlations of MAP and Previous KS Assessments <ul><li>Course consumption in math is highly correlated to state assessment results. </li></ul><ul><li>Students scoring at the 40 th percentile and below on the MAP test are at-risk. </li></ul><ul><li>Students scoring below Meets Standard are at-risk. </li></ul>
  14. 16. Correlations of MAP and Previous KS Assessments
  15. 17. Correlations of MAP and Previous KS Assessments
  16. 18. Correlations of MAP and Previous KS Assessments
  17. 19. Correlations 2006 and 2007 KS MATH Assessments
  18. 20. Correlations 2006 and 2007 KS READING Assessments
  19. 21. At-Risk Spreadsheet
  20. 22. Students Scoring Below Meets Standard - MATH <ul><li>82% of the students who scored below Meets Standard were classified as either red or yellow in the star system. </li></ul>
  21. 23. % of Color Group Scoring at Meets or Above - MATH <ul><li>91% of the students classified as green scored at Meets or above. </li></ul><ul><li>70% of the students classified as yellow scored at Meets or above. </li></ul><ul><li>46% of the students classified as red scored at Meets or above. </li></ul>
  22. 24. Students Scoring Below Meets Standard - READING <ul><li>82% of the students who scored below Meets Standard were classified as either red or yellow in the star system. </li></ul>
  23. 25. % of Color Group Scoring at Meets or Above - READING <ul><li>93% of the students classified as green scored at Meets or above. </li></ul><ul><li>75% of the students classified as yellow scored at Meets or above. </li></ul><ul><li>34% of the students classified as red scored at Meets or above. </li></ul>
  24. 27. Three Questions <ul><li>What is important for them to know? </li></ul><ul><li>What is the best way for them to learn these things? </li></ul><ul><li>How do I know when they have “learned” it? </li></ul>
  25. 30. The Reference Points for Analysis The Tested Curriculum The Taught Curriculum Quality Control The Written Curriculum Relationships
  26. 31. School #1 <ul><li>The next series of slides represent an elementary school’s results. </li></ul><ul><li>A specific subgroup did not attain AYP. </li></ul><ul><li>If four more students in the subgroup had scored at Meets Standard or higher, the subgroup would have attained AYP. </li></ul>
  27. 32. Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Enrollment School #1 = Student enrolled in the school
  28. 33. Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 = Student is a member of the selected subgroup Enrollment School #1 34 students are in the subgroup
  29. 34. Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 = Student did not count for AYP Counts For AYP School #1 32 students in the subgroup counted for AYP.
  30. 35. Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 = Student scored at Meets Standard or higher Meets or Above School #1 <ul><li>40.6% of students in the subgroup scored at Meets or above </li></ul><ul><li>67.8% of all students in the school scored at Meets or above </li></ul>
  31. 36. <ul><li>From the data, what are your observations and impressions? </li></ul><ul><li>What other information would you want from the school? </li></ul><ul><li>Based upon the thumbnail sketch of the school’s performance, what would recommend? </li></ul>Three More Questions
  32. 37. School #2 <ul><li>The next series of slides represent a different elementary school’s results. </li></ul><ul><li>A specific subgroup did not attain AYP. </li></ul><ul><li>If two more students in the subgroup had scored at Meets Standard or higher, the subgroup would have attained AYP. </li></ul>
  33. 38. Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 = Student enrolled in the school Enrollment School #2
  34. 39. Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 = Student is a member of the selected subgroup 40 students are in the subgroup Enrollment School #2
  35. 40. Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 = Student did not count for AYP 40 students in the subgroup counted for AYP. Counts For AYP School #2
  36. 41. Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 = Student scored at Meets Standard or higher <ul><li>50% of students in the subgroup scored at Meets or above </li></ul><ul><li>88% of all students in the school scored at Meets or above </li></ul>Meets or Above School #2
  37. 42. School #3 <ul><li>The next series of slides represent a middle school’s math results. </li></ul><ul><li>The SES (lunch support) subgroup attained AYP only through use of the confidence interval. </li></ul><ul><li>If one more student in the SES subgroup had scored below Meets Standard, the subgroup would not have attained AYP. </li></ul>
  38. 43. = Student is a member of the selected subgroup 39% of the students in this course who counted for AYP are in the subgroup. Math 7 Enrollment
  39. 44. Grade 8 student = Student is a member of the SES subgroup 26% of the students in this course who counted for AYP are in the subgroup. Prealgebra 8 Enrollment
  40. 45. = Student is a member of the SES subgroup 44% of the students in this course who counted for AYP are in the subgroup. Math 8 Enrollment
  41. 46. = Student is a member of the SES subgroup 18% of the students in this course who counted for AYP are in the subgroup. Grade 8 student Algebra I Enrollment
  42. 47. = Student is a member of the SES subgroup 7% of the students in this course who counted for AYP are in the subgroup. Geometry Enrollment
  43. 48. = Student is a member of the SES subgroup 43% of the students in this course who counted for AYP are in the subgroup. “ Other” Enrollment
  44. 49. = Student scored at Meets Standard or higher Math 7 % Meets or Above Math 7 Bldg All students 37% 67% SES students 29% 57%
  45. 50. = Student scored at Meets Standard or higher Grade 8 student Prealgebra 8 % Meets or Above PA 8 Bldg All students 74% 67% SES students 67% 57%
  46. 51. = Student scored at Meets Standard or higher Math 8 % Meets or Above Math 8 Bldg All students 21% 67% SES students 15% 57%
  47. 52. = Student scored at Meets Standard or higher Algebra I % Meets or Above Alg. I Bldg All students 96% 67% SES students 88% 57%
  48. 53. = Student scored at Meets Standard or higher Geometry % Meets or Above Geo Bldg All students 100% 67% SES students 100% 57%
  49. 54. = Student scored at Meets Standard or higher Other % Meets or Above Other Bldg All students 85% 67% SES students 100% 57%
  50. 55. = Student scored at Meets Standard or higher Grade 8 student Prealgebra 8 % Meets or Above 4 1 2 8 3 4 7 6 5 8 7 2 1
  51. 56. What Stands Out? <ul><li>For my benefit, tell me three things that stand out from today’s presentation. </li></ul>

×