Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Charles Henderson | How Fit For Purpose Are Community Accounting Systems?

653 views

Published on

Presented at the 4th International Conference on Carbon Accounting
25th November 2011
www.icarb.org

Published in: Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Charles Henderson | How Fit For Purpose Are Community Accounting Systems?

  1. 1. How fit for purpose are community accounting systems? Climate Futures
  2. 2. <ul><li>What’s driving community carbon disclosure? </li></ul><ul><li>What’s required of community footprints? </li></ul><ul><li>Case study: Callander community </li></ul><ul><li>Discussion and conclusions </li></ul>The next 15 minutes…
  3. 3. Contents What’s driving community footprinting?
  4. 4. <ul><li>Has made £37.7 million available to communities between 2008-2012 - supported 345 communities </li></ul><ul><li>£10.3 million available per year to end March 2015 </li></ul><ul><li>Primarily, carbon reduction; should lead to other community benefits and a sustainable legacy </li></ul><ul><li>Includes behaviour change, business interaction, community building refurbishment </li></ul><ul><li>No renewable feasibilities; no hardware eg PV panels; no home insulation </li></ul>The Climate Challenge Fund
  5. 5. What’s required of CCF community footprints?
  6. 6. <ul><li>‘ Routemap’ guidance and spreadsheet provided for activities in more detail than before, following Ecometrica review </li></ul><ul><li>Allows evaluation of carbon impact of proposed / funded activities </li></ul><ul><li>Some communities have chosen to footprint across all activities ie baseline then revisit </li></ul><ul><li>No software / approach specified </li></ul>
  7. 7. Case study: Callander
  8. 8. <ul><li>Tourist town – edge of the Lomond and Trossachs National Park </li></ul><ul><li>3500 people / 1419 households </li></ul><ul><li>Mix of age / size / type of homes </li></ul><ul><li>School + leisure centre, and seven other public buildings </li></ul><ul><li>Businesses not addressed (not allowable under funding in 2010) </li></ul>
  9. 9. Contents <ul><li>Door to door interviews carried out by staff – 128 / 113 in sample </li></ul><ul><li>Responses fed into Reap Petite software (SEI) for calculating footprints </li></ul><ul><li>Data extrapolated and analysed via Excel </li></ul><ul><li>2010/11 household emissions </li></ul>
  10. 10. Contents 26,223 tCO 2 e 25,768 <ul><li>SEI carbon factors: ‘black box’, thought to be DEFRA/DECC for housing & travel </li></ul><ul><li>Public buildings: kWh and DEFRA factors </li></ul><ul><li>Extrapolation shows reduction of 455 tCO 2 e, 1.7%. Separate EST calc. shows 502 tCO 2 e redn. from energy efficiency measures </li></ul>
  11. 11. <ul><li>how can Callander reduce its carbon footprint in line with Scottish targets? </li></ul><ul><li>what does this mean on the ground eg houses insulated, allotments, behaviour change </li></ul><ul><li>what’s happening at a national level? </li></ul><ul><li>what can people do individually? </li></ul><ul><li>how can Callander benefit from reducing its footprint? </li></ul>Why a 15-year plan?
  12. 12. Contents www.callanderandclimatechange.org.uk/
  13. 13. Contents www.callanderandclimatechange.org.uk/
  14. 14. Possible pathways www.callanderandclimatechange.org.uk/
  15. 15. Index of reduction www.callanderandclimatechange.org.uk/
  16. 16. Contents Moderate emissions by source www.callanderandclimatechange.org.uk/
  17. 17. Contents Outlook
  18. 18. <ul><li>Tools are limited and non-transparent reflecting limited commercial opportunity </li></ul><ul><li>Could communities be responsible for their own carbon budgets one day? </li></ul><ul><li>If so, reporting requirements will tighten </li></ul><ul><li>Otherwise, reporting is likely to be driven by progressive communities and funding needs </li></ul>Ecometrica CCF review: “Improved measurement methods for capturing the impact of behavioural interventions are needed so that priorities between different approaches can be assessed fairly, including longitudinal research”
  19. 19. Charles Henderson e: charles@climatefutures.co.uk t: 07740 946955 www.climatefutures.co.uk footprints : reduction : carbon credits : communication : international development Contact

×