Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Published Paper in the Proceedgins of the 1st UNWTO World Conference on Smart Destinations in Murcia (Spain) 15-17 Feb 2017

The following document is the accepted paper abstract in the 1st UNWTO World Conference on Smart Destinations that will take place in Murcia between 15-17 February 2017. The World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations.
The paper entitled: 'Translocal Strategies for Experimenting with Smart Tourism Labs in Zumaia: The Case of the Basque Coast Geopark, Basque Country (Spain)'.
This paper summarizes a research project that will be set out with a prospective methodology aiming to define while implementing, the inner perception and outside projection of the touristic assets and activities in Zumaia and coastal region covering the Basque Coast Geopark.

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Published Paper in the Proceedgins of the 1st UNWTO World Conference on Smart Destinations in Murcia (Spain) 15-17 Feb 2017

  1. 1. 1 Translocal Strategies for Experimenting with Smart Tourism Labs in Zumaia: The Case of the Basque Coast Geopark, Basque Country (Spain) Dr Igor Calzada MBA1 and Ana Arranz2 1 University of Oxford, ESRC Urban Transformations & Future of Cities Programmes, 56 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6QS, United Kingdom e-mail: 2 Translokal Academic Entrepreneurship for Policy Making, 2 Arritokieta 14, Zumaia 20750, Basque Country, Spain, e-mail:
  2. 2. 2 ABSTRACT This paper presents a preliminary action research methodology based on living labs to overcome the current and simplistic one-size-fits-all big-data-driven smart tourism policy approach. Located in Zumaia, in the coast of the Basque Country (Spain), an experiment will be depicted innovative/democratic ways of touristic policy-making practices at the local level in respond to an increasing trend of visitors. Given the lack of attention about qualitative/ethnographic/strategic policy-making tools in the conventional governance realm, this paper shows a contextually-based living lab experimental methodology to co- create a prospective strategy building processes with local agents represented and fit in the multi- stakeholders Penta Helix framework. Keywords: Smart Tourism; Smart Destinations; Living Labs; Unesco Global Geoparks; Multi-stakeholders. To cite this article: Calzada, I. & Arranz, A. (2017), Translocal Strategies for Experimenting with Smart Tourism Labs in Zumaia: The Case of the Basque Coast Geopark, Basque Country (Spain), paper accepted and published in the Proceedings in the 1st UNWTO World Conference on Smart Destinations, Murcia (Spain).
  3. 3. 3 1. INTRODUCTION: TRANSLOCAL STRATEGIES TOWARDS SMART TOURISM Despite the geopolitical world context, which is characterised by increasing boundaries to human mobility in an uneven realm full of walls and borders, the current pattern of tourism has not been diminished. In fact, translocal mobility, reflecting a wide range of motivations, emotions, tools, destinations and strategies, provides new opportunities to analyse, experiment and propose new smart policies that facilitate the transition to unexplored tourism models. Particularly remarkable are the experiences in many places regarding the role of tourists as visitors and locals as residents in experimental interventions for empowering local communities in remote coastal regions. This is the case of the coastal village of Zumaia (Basque Country) in Spain, which is establishing a new participatory local strategy for tourism after two remarkable events with clear tourism-related consequences for the community: first, the success in attacting and gaining 50% of visitors to the high-valued geological area of the Basque Coast Global Geopark1 , particularly also known as the flysch, and second, the filming of scenes from Season 7 of the blockbuster TV series Game of Thrones in the surroundings of the village. This paper thus will depict the specific current touristic, social, economic and political context of Zumaia to better understand the project that has recently kicked off: ‘Experimenting with Smart Tourism Labs’. This project, based on ethnographic and strategic techniques derived from action research, aims to set up a participatory itinerary while implementing a prospective view by considering a wide range of stakeholders . The multi- stakeholder scheme will follow the Penta-Helix framework by encompassing local authorities, the private sector, academia and research centres, civil society and social entrepreneurs and activists. Ultimately, the inner perception and outside projection of the touristic assets shared by residents and visitors contribute as much as activities and the infrastructure in the village do toward establishing a credible translocal tourism strategy. Nevertheless, it has been suggested that Zumaia be developed as a ‘smart destination’ without input from the different stakeholders. As such, ‘smart’ technological solutions that take advantage of the so-called Open Data or Big Data, in the era of ‘dataism’, have not always been focused on necessities and usability. In order to shed some light on this debate, this paper will present some preliminary methodological guidelines to undertake the aforementioned action research project in the village of Zumaia. By blending hospitality management, experience economy, ‘knowmads’ and millennials and by connecting talent and sustainable tourism, among other trends, this paper explores the opportunities for Zumaia in the Basque Coast Geopark by setting up a ‘Smart Tourism Lab’. More broadly, the ‘Smart Tourism Lab’ will consider the village itself as an open platform merging technological ownership, local economy, culturally-rooted tradition, inclusive identity, international openness, political bridging (social capital), and social innovation for setting up an innovative touristic prospective strategy. As a preliminary statement for the 1st UNWTO World Conference on Smart Destinations, it should be noted that ‘smart tourism destination management has become more complex since current developments in technology have empowered the collective integration of resources for value co-creation by all actors within the smart tourism destination ecosystem’ (Boes et al., 2016). However, in some cases of ‘smart tourism’ (Gretzel et al., 2015), ‘smart destinations’ (Gobierno de España & Segittur, 2015) and ‘sustainable tourism’ (Buckley, 2012; World Summit on Sustainable Tourism 2015), there is evidence of socio-political, socio-technical and socio-economic misalignments in the relationship between the locals (residents, or simply, citizens) and the visitors (or simply, tourists). The most paradigmatic case these days seems to be Barcelona (Adjuntament de Barcelona, 2016; Cócola, A., 2015; Llambea, 2016), but already there are other well-known cases such as the 2020 Tourism Strategy of Copenhagen that branded itself as ‘The End of Tourism as We Know It’ (Wonderful Copenhagen, 2017). The fact is that beyond the technodeterministic imperative of the ‘smartness’ in our hyper-connected societies these days (Calzada et al., 2015), there is an urgent need for experimental policy-making processes between tourists/visitors and locals/residents (Thackara, 2017). Actually, the next post-crisis economic model should embrace such a socio-technical complexity, instead of simply reducing it (Thackara, 2005 & 2015). In this regard, the 1 Basque Coast UNESCO Global Geopark.
  4. 4. 4 popular geographer David Harvey recently visited Barcelona in order to engage publicly with local stakeholders in analysing the urban side-effects of gentrification in Barcelona, given the way in which the so-called ‘sharing economy’ companies such as Airbnb and Uber, among others, have been operating (Stone, 2016). Hence, there is a correlation between certain ‘smart’ interventions and the not-always- positive side-effects for the city, and particularly, for certain segments of the population (Harvey, 2016). Generally speaking, ‘smart tourism’ (OECD, 2016; UNWTO, 2016; World Tourism Organization, 2016) has emerged as a concept that enables destinations to build their local economies in relation to global exchange/competitiveness patterns based on the interoperability of systems and co-creation of tourism products between all stakeholders. These patterns, based on emergent smart cities and smart living developments, take city principles to urban or rural areas and not only consider residents but also tourists in their efforts to support mobility, resource availability and allocation, sustainability and quality of life/visits. The smart city idea from the critical social innovation perspective means that a new paradigm is required when bottom-up interventions are the key governance challenge in the postgrowth era (Calzada, 2016; Calzada et al., 2015). The need for a new paradigm is apparent in the effects of some disruptive private initiatives such as Uber and AirBnB, among others, which are altering the traditional dynamic between the locals/residents and the trans-locals/tourists by combining the practice of travelling, the changing nature of the mobile way of living and new understandings of the place itself (Peretta, 2014). Smart strategies can bring together the need to use technological innovations to develop regional socio- economic development of territories towards social innovation and governance and create value to all stakeholders. As such, new patterns of using technology, travelling and even living are increasingly producing a large number of apps, software applications for user engagement, bottom-up decision- making pervasive processes, user-driven innovation platforms, collective intelligence initiatives and crowdfunding projects (Eatwith, 2016; Hjalager, 2015; Minube, 2016; Refuga, 2016; Sustain Green, 2017). In this context, the availability of data and, more particularly, the governance models of these data are part of the new condition in cities and of being citizens, regardless of whether or not those are locals/residents or visitors/tourists. This paper addresses a specific research and policy intervention called ‘Smart Tourism Labs’ in the village of Zumaia, Basque Country (Spain). The principal aims is to innovate with the local actors different meanings of translocality2 . As Brickell et al. (2011) stated, ‘translocality consists of a multi-scalar repertoire of connections between here and there that span across imaginations, practices and affects’. 2. STATE-OF-THE-ART: PROSPECTIVE TOURISTIC INNOVATION According to OECD (2016), ‘rapid growth in international tourism flows, new consumer trends, digitalisation of the economy, security issues, and adaptation to climate change are among the major challenges facing the tourism sector. These will require active, innovative and integrated policy responses to ensure that tourism remains a competitive sector and continues to deliver economically and sustainably in the years to come’. UNESCO Global Geoparks (Basque Coast UNESCO Global Geopark, 2017; Farsani, et al., 2011; Geoparkea Euskal Kostaldea Costa Vasca, 2012; Geoparkea Euskal Kostaldea Costa Vasca, 2012; UNESCO Global Geopark, 2017; UNESCO Global Geoparks & United Nations, 2016) offer an opportunity to provide a network of unified geographical areas where sites and landscapes of international geological significance are managed with a holistic concept of protection, education and sustainable development and to provide to local people a sense of pride in their region and a means of strengthen their identification with the area. While developing geotourism, the establishment of geoparks can generate new job opportunities, new economic activities and additional sources of income, especially in rural regions (Farsani et. al, 2013). Rural coastal regions show an outstanding context to promote sustainable 2
  5. 5. 5 development goals while blending the rural and the urban in a new mix (Andersen et al., 2016). Particularly, the Basque city-region (Calzada, 2011) presents a mountainous landscape that merges the rural and the urban in a new innovative and sustainable outcome: RUrban. Saxena (2016) has studied the way rural tourism could be promoted from the marketing perspective. However, in the case of this paper, in Zumaia, and also in many small coastal rural villages in Europe, smart tourism should be more about gaining strategic and prospective capabilities and scaling them up, rather than just about ‘foreigner’-franchised smart-technology-in-the-box purchases. Thus, in this paper the focus is on experimenting a prospective touristic innovation within the key stakeholders in the village. According to Boes et al. (2016), smart tourism refers to the fastness and the value of co-creation, which requires collective leadership constructively engaged with the local community by ensuring a highly representative participation and deliberation process and regularly monitorised action plan. It is noteworthy then, how in a remote and ‘isolated’ country such as Iceland, which was hit dramatically by the financial crisis (Casado et al., 2015; Iceland Academy, 2016; Jóhannesson, 2010), the prospective touristic innovation has been developing for years through an avant-garde proposal flavoured with Open Data platforms and initiatives. 3. CONTEXT: RURBAN LOCAL LIVING LABS & EXPERIMENTAL COMMUNITIES This article aims to incorporate the intervention via Living Labs to the socio-territorial feature of the rurban community. Associated with the Open Social Innovation, ‘Smart Tourism Lab, ZumaiaLab’ aims to set up an experimental community to discuss, debate, prototype and deliberate touristic products, initiatives, services, platforms, technologies and ideas that will encourage co-creation, user engagement, citizen testing and experimentation facilities targeting innovation in the field of tourism. The notion of the Living Labs was coined by Professor William Michell from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in Boston. People from the world outside were invited into living laboratories where ethnographers and other researchers observed how they used newly invented information technology. Later on, the concept has moved out of the laboratories and into the real world. There have been numerous attempts to define what a Living Lab is, but there is no firm consensus in the literature. We see living labs as innovation platforms where the stakeholders develop and exchange ideas in a community. In the context of the Smart City debate (Keith et al., 2016), an slight evolution from smartness to experimentation, as something already given or produced for us, can be noticed. As such, ‘smart citizens’ are already being considered as decision makers rather than just data providers (Calzada, 2017). In the regional context of the Basque Country in Spain, and after gradually overcoming the dramatic consequences of the political violence (Voltes-Dorta et al., 2016), in order to understand the socio- political challenge at the micro/community level and to suggest an experimental implementation considering the mutual stakeholders’ interdependencies, a dynamic strategic intervention has been suggested in the coastal village of Zumaia by having an experimental community at the heart of its touristic policy. Zumaia is located in the cross-border Euroregion Euskadi-Navarre-Aquitaine, in the region of the Urola- Coast in Gipuzkoa (Eusko Jaurlaritza/Gobierno Vasco, 2012; 2014; 2015). Zumaia is lapped by the sea and nestled in the bay formed by the mouths of the rivers Urola and Narrondo. With a population of around 9,800 inhabitants, it is configured as a rural area with a high density of population and a GPD per capita of 35,742 € with an unemployment rate of 10.55%. Above 70% of the population uses the Basque language (Heller et al., 2014) and demonstrates a strong sense of identity in relation to the territory, the natural environment and traditions. Zumaia, being part of the Basque Coast Geopark, has a natural protected area with a highly valued geological heritage: 13 km of cliffs with a spectacular formation of rock layers known as flysch deposits. It has excellent transport links and is close to the three Basque capitals; San Sebastian is only 30 minutes by car and Bilbao, 50 minutes.
  6. 6. 6 The type of seasonal tourism predominant in the region is beginning to congest and change the habits of mature destinations like San Sebastian. The high attractive value of Zumaia makes it one of the local destinations that absorb part of these visitors. Just as British in rural France spend much time and effort in trying to become ‘local’ (Brotherton, 2015), the visitors respect with the environment and community. In fact, the challenge is becoming quite straight-forward: how to ‘localise’ visitors through their temporary and partial experience by achieving a richer, mutually ‘profitable’, whatever it is, visit and the local scenery enrichment? On the other hand, during the year there is a type of targeted tourism connected to knowledge and research. We can argue that the first one is more leisure-oriented tourist ideal-type (experiential tourist) and the second one is more knowledge-driven tourist ideal-type (cognitive tourist). At present, a turning point and urgent policy response is required regarding the exponential and rapid growth of the local, national and international visitors in the last years as consequence of the promotion in the UNESCO Global Geoparks3 network and, short term, the expected increase due to the super- production of the worldwide well-known cinematographic series called Game of Thrones4 (Telegraph, 2016), among other international and national blockbusters. Guaranteeing regional coordination of hospitality management and the tourism experience, the government and public agencies, mainly the UNWTO, the UNESCO Global Geoparks, the Basque Coast Geopark, the Basque Government, the San Sebastian Metropolitan area, the Coast Community of Urola and the City-Council of Zumaia, have developed strategies that comprise a consolidated tourism model defined by gastronomy, beaches, heritage and traditions, festivals, fishing, sport, tourism of health, routes and guided tours (Dwyer et al., 2012). Of particular interest are the strategies implemented by the Basque Coast Geopark, which carries out its educational mission through the Interpretation Centre Algorri. The creation of innovative local enterprises, new jobs and high-quality training courses has stimulated new sources of revenue, generated through geotourism, while the geological resources of the area are protected (Farsani et al., 2010). 3 List of UNESCO Global Geopark sciences/unesco-global-geoparks/list-of-unesco-global-geoparks/ 4 Mapped: Every single Game of Thrones filming location. Season 1-6. graphics/game-of-thrones-filming-locations-guide/
  7. 7. 7 Figure 1: 69 EU Geoparks Network Having tested the success of the Basque Coast Geopark, with an increase of 50% in visitors during the summer period of the previous year, Zumaia is preparing itself to open the debate on a tourist model that ensures the coexistence of locals and tourists in an open and participatory manner. It hopes to become a sustainable smart destination and places its attention on experiences that unfold in remote places like New Zealand, turned into a case of reference for becoming a filming location of the Lord of the Rings Trilogy5 (The Lord of the Rings Filming Locations, 2016) and the international experience in planning and management of sustainable tourism destinations in Iceland (Iceland Academy, 2016; Jóhannesson, et al., 2010). 4. SCIENTIFIC & POLICY INTERVENTION: SMART TOURISM LABS, ZUMAIALAB Considering the socio-demographic features of the village (Urola Kostako Udal Elkartea & Gura Market In, 2016; Zumaiako Udala & Elhuyar Aholkularitza, 2016), a living lab intervention has been designed as the most suitable model of socio-territorial action. Thus, living lab inteventions usually include the following features and principles (Guimont et al., 2016; Evans et al., 2017; Karvonen et al., 2014, Urban Transformations, 2017): 1. A technology infrastructure 2. An ecosystem of stakeholders who can interact to develop and assess products, services, processes or systems 3. An innovation process that is as open as possible 4. Users playing a key role as co-creators of the products, services and technologies being developed 5. A human-centric design approach that involves ethnographic observation, empathy and rapid prototyping 5 The Lord of the Rings Trilogy Filming Locations. New Zealand. of-the-rings-trilogy-filming-locations/
  8. 8. 8 6. Sustained and meaningful interaction and community involvement 7. Consideration of users’ natural environments Given the process involving a different range of stakeholders in the village, context management platforms for tourism applications (Buján et al., 2013) could be considered initially. However, the focus will be on the new tools and apps for travelling, and particularly, regarding the segment of population known as ‘millennials’ due to their particular attitude towards new technological prototypes as early adopters (Barton et al., 2013; Phocuswright, 2016; Wang & Xiang, 2012), new patterns of mobility known as ‘knowmads’ (Moravec, 2013) and new values in life in general (Sinek, 2016). This segment of population will be particularly observed ethnographically as testers but also as decision makers and prosumers as well. The project will carry out an action research methodology based on triangularisation techniques that intertwine, on the one hand, a strategic and prospective policy formulation and active co-design with multi-stakeholders, and on the other hand, an ethnographic approach of place from local and global codes (translocal). The desinged dynamic encourages a certain kind of participation that searches for diversity, heterogeneity, and quality of the opinions, more than in an agreement. A particular ethnography will be produced about ‘millennials’, mobile technologies and entrepreneurial attitudes of the local young population and also visitors by attempting to build bridges and create a natural interaction between them. Applying the 5-Systems6 (Calzada, 2015) framework to the local touristic ecosystem will allow us to analyse the systems, factors and indicators involved in co-designing contexts that guarantee the touristic innovation with a constructive dialogue between stakeholders in the Smart Tourism Labs called ZumaiaLab. The 5-System is an holistic framework to identify innovative processes and to formulate policies by considering systemically the whole range of socio-territorial governance systems. 5. INTERVENTION PROJECT & ACTION RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: EXPERIMENTING WITH SMART TOURISM LABS IN ZUMAIA The design of the Smart Tourism Lab for Zumaia that arises in this project is fundamentally driven by the idea of fostering a transformative alliance in the policy field of tourism. As such, altering the dynamics in the deliberative process and setting up a collaborative platform to show, disseminate and test ideas and initiatives will revolutionise the touristic strategy for Zumaia. The current tourism model for Zumaia needs to innovate so that business and destination can evolve and advance in terms of sustainability, reputation and technology. The laboratory itself is presented as an environment where cooperation is enabled to innovate in the macro, meso and micro scales within the territorial systemic framework from the perspective of open social innovation (Calzada et al., 2013), sending out international signs (global) which includes elements of its Idiosyncrasy with a locally-rooted smart update. In order to achieve this goal, it is necessary to lay emphasis on connecting cutting-edge trends that are modifying the way we understand tourism, mobility and the human experience in places: 1. Knowledge Exchange: based on an unlimited and open access information about destination with Massive Open Online Course (MOOC), Online Educational Resources (OER) and Augmented Reality (AR); with the substantial participation of people with knowmads and millennial profiles. 6 Calzada, 2015. Available at: (accessed on 7th February 2017).
  9. 9. 9 2. Experience Tourism: working concepts such as online reputation, hospitality management, internal perception, and external projection. 3. (Un)plugging: in terms of the extent to which ICT enriches or ruins the vacation experience (Calzada et al., 2015). 4. Connecting Talent: leveraging the value of local and social entrepreneurship as generator of employment and business opportunities. 5. Smart Tourism: exploring business intelligence, data analytics and open data platforms, with a special consideration of the technopolitics of data regarding privacy, data literacy, self-tracking devices and security. To assess the impact of touristic activities and how these impacts influence visitor experience and locals’ perception, a systemic approach is used because it provides an understanding on the relationship between tourism and its social ecosystem in Zumaia, and thus offers tools needed to clarify the complex realm of the touristic experience. The methodological procedure is made up of the following components:  Identify and select key variables  Determine causal relationships between key variables  Define success goals  Determine system success indicators  Formulate possible policy actions  Implement policies Regarding the research design: a survey answered by 100 respondents and a selected group of 50 in- depth interviews will be carried out to achieve the research objectives. The survey is divided into five parts by following the 5-System framework (Calzada, 2015). The first part, URBS, will revolve around sustainable natural environment, urban system and the human geography. The second part, CYBER, will revolve around physical, digital and social connectivity. The third part, CIVITAS, is related to social-cultural issues where multiculturalism, talent, entrepreneurship and local communities are directly connected to the tourism. The forth part, POLIS, will ask respondents about the identity, glocalisation, civic participation, and territorial regulation. The last part, DEMOS, is focused on striking a balance about the other previous four systems. Likewise, non-locals and experts in tourism will be engaged in the entrepreneurial activities of ZumaiaLab. Among others, locally-based entrepreneurial initiatives or start-ups will be used to discuss the strengths and threats of tourism complexity and learn from similar experiences to be considered adaptively in Zumaia. So far, this article has already mentioned some examples: Iceland Academy7 by Inspired Iceland, The future of dining is here by EatWith8 , Donde empiezan los viajes by minube9 , Travel with entrepreneurs by REFUGA10 and Carbon Footprint Credit Card by Sustain:Green 11 . The ZumaiaLab workshop sessions will invite a selected group of participants by being representatives of the five entities that comprise the Penta-Helix framework: 1. policy-makers and politicians 2. managers 3. academics and technologists 4. citizens (civil society) 7 Iceland Academy by Inspired by Iceland. 8 The Future of Dinning is Here by EatWith. 9 Donde empiezan los viajes by minube. 10 Travel with entrepreneurs by REFUGA. 11 Carbon FootPrint Credit Card by Sustain:Green.
  10. 10. 10 5. professionals, social entrepreneurs, and activists The intervention will select among 34 SMEs, 60 equipment services, 232 shops and professionals, 43 associations, several academics and politicians and visitors. This, allows us to make an ethnographic observation to describe the relationship between visitors and locals and thus extract some policy recommendations. 6. PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS: KICKING-OFF Based on the preliminary informal pre-test carried out and after gathering some insights so far: 1. Different reactions could be expected regarding the strategic effect of tourism on the village. 2. On the positive side-effects, the current situation offers unexplored local business opportunities to locate Zumaia on the world map: to value geological heritage and to open new scenarios for innovation in relation smart destination. 3. On the negative side-effects, it was mentioned the lack of foresight to anticipate the increase of the number of tourists/hikers is already a fact. As such, it could be perceived a sort of mistrust about the hype of new technologies as tools that could hypothetically bring benefits, contribute to the protection of the natural environment and landscape, reduce the waste generation and ultimately cause a remarkable loss of self-identity due to an invasion of visitors. 4. An evidence-based observation suggests that for certain stakeholders, touristic innovation is subject to and dependent on the rhythm of the public calls. 5. The way in which participation and deliberation in a laboratory process is seen represents highly positive attitudes, even after years of political and communitarian confrontation. 6. The internal perception on the current touristic model is divided. 7. The opportunity to build a collective intelligence by bridging heterogeneous stakeholders in the village shows an overall agreement. The impact on the village represents the first priority for locals. And despite the positive effect on the economic revenue for the local finances, the environmental concern and the strong seasonality of the incomers emphasise the requirement for a deliberative touristic governance model, based on forward- looking strategies reinforced by smart destination policies, ultimately fixed by the taxpayers. 7. FINAL REMARK: BEYOND DATA-ISM To conclude, this paper has been based on the preliminary intervention that will take place in the specific location of Zumaia in the Basque Country (Spain). Despite the increasing trend towards a more data- driven society and policy, this paper, by contrast, has just focused on the contextual particular conditions and the stakeholder ad-hoc composition of the location. Although the data-rich policies are required in tourism, this paper advocates that a more experimental, innovative and thus, democratic policy-making tools and methods should complement the current explosion of dataism (Calzada, 2017). After having researched internationally other models of touristic policy-making, we could argue that Spain and the Mediterranean countries particularly, could run the risk to invest in the second bubble after 2008 crisis. We are referring to the bubble of data without literacy, accountability and public deliberation. Especially in the tourism, where the so-called sharing economy multinational giants, such as Uber and Airbnb, are socially gentrifying (and as a consequence, spoiling) internationally well-known touristic hubs by altering their original and authentic territorial DNA. Hence, place matters, and will do matter more in the future, if touristic policy just focuses on the aggregation of data, without ‘unplugging’ its ‘smartness’. It is worth to begin with experimenting which kind of places, tourism wants to build.
  11. 11. 11 REFERENCES 1. Buján, D., Martín, D., Torices, O., López-de-la-Ipiña, C., Lamsfus, C., Abaitua, J. & Alzua- Sorzabal, A. (2013). Context Management Platform for Tourism Applications. Sensors, 13(7), 8060-8078. DOI: 2. Ajuntament de Barcelona (2016). Plan Estratégico de Turismo de Barcelona 2020: Diagnosis Estratégica. 3. Andersen, I.M.V, Blichfeldt, B.S., Liburd, J.J. (2016). Sustainability in coastal tourism development: an example from Denmark. Current Issues in Tourism, 1-8. 4. Barton, C., Haywood, J., Jhunjhunwala, P., & Bhatia, V. (2013). Travelling with Millenials. 5. Basque Coast UNESCO Global Geopark. (2017). Available at: (accessed on 6th February 2017). 6. Brotherton, B. (2015). Researching Hospitality and Tourism, 2nd Edition, SAGE. 7. Buckley, R. (2012). Sustainable Tourism: Research and Reality. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(2), 528-546. DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2012.02.003 8. Boes, K., Buhalis, D. & Inversini, A. (2016). Smart tourism destinations: ecosystems for tourism destination competitiveness. International Journal of Tourism Cities, 2(2016), 108-124. DOI:10.1108/IJTC-12-2015-0032 9. Calzada, I. (2017). From the Smart City to the Experimental City: Smart Citizens as Decision Makers Rather Than Data Providers, in Co-Designing the Economies of Becoming in the Great Transition: Radical Approaches in Dialogue with Contemplative Social Sciences, eds. Zachary David Walsh and Vincenzo Mario Bruno Giorgino (Claremont: Process Century Press). [In-Print] 10. Calzada, I. (2017), The Techno-Politics of Data and Smart Devolution in Cities-Regions: Comparing Glasgow, Bristol, Barcelona, and Bilbao. Systems Journal (ISSN 2079-8954), Special Issue ‘Smart Cities and Regions as Systems of Innovation’. 5(1), 18. DOI: 10.3390/systems5010018 11. Calzada, I. (2016). Keynote Speaker. TransloKal Strategies: Connecting (Talented) Citizens in (Smart) Remote Regions. SmartTravel Conference in Bragança, Portugal. Available at: content/uploads/2016/12/SmartTravel16%20Bragança%20Portugal.pptx.pdf (accessed on 8th February 2017). 12. Calzada, I. (2016), Basque Smart City-Region Strategy in the H2020 European Context / La Estrategia Vasca de Territorio Inteligente en el Contexto Europeo Horizonte 2020: De la Agenda Digital Municipal a la Gobernanza de la Ciudad-Región Inteligente Vasca – HERRI- SMARTIK commissioned by EUDEL (Basque Municipalities’ Association), LKS Consultancy and the Basque Regional Government, Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Information Society Department. Translokal – Academic Entrepreneurship for Policy Making. ISBN: 978-84-946385-1-0. 13. Calzada, I. (2016), (Un)Plugging Smart Cities Transformations and Strategies in Europe, Harvard University Whitepaper contribution given on 13th October at 2016 Strategic Innovation Summit: Smart Cities Europe held by the Dublin City Council and the Technology and Entrepreneurship Center at Harvard University in Dublin, Maynooth University. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34524.80000. 14. Calzada, I. (2016). (Un)plugging Smart Cities with urban transformations: Towards
  12. 12. 12 multi-stakehoder city-regional complex urbanity? URBS Revista de Estudios Urbanos y Ciencias Sociales, 6(2), 25-45. 15. Calzada, I., & Cobo, C. (2015). Unplugging: Deconstructing the Smart City. Journal of Urban Technology. Taylor & Francis., 22(1), 23-43. 16. Calzada, I., Chautón, A., Di Siena, D., (2013). #MacroMesoMicro. Systemic Territory Framework from the perspective of the Social Innovation. Self-edition. 17. Calzada, I. (2011). ¿Hacia una Ciudad Vasca? Aproximación desde la Innovación Social. (1st ed.). Vitoria-Gasteiz: Servicio Central de Publicaciones del Gobierno Vasco. Available at: aproximacin-desde-la-innovacin-social (accessed on 8th February 2017). 18. Cócola, A. (2015). Tourism and commercial gentrification. Paper presented at the RC21 International Conference on ‘The Ideal City: between myth and reality. Representations, policies, contradictions and challenges for tomorrow’s urban life’. Urbino (Italy) 27-29 August 2015. Available at: (accessed on 1st February 2016). 19. Eatwith (2016). The Future of Dinning is Here by EatWith. Available at: (accessed on 6th January 2017). 20. Guimont D., & Lapointe, D.. (2016). Empowering Local Tourism Providers to Innovate through a Living Lab Process: Does Scale Matter? Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(11), 18-25. 21. Dwyer, L., Gill, A., & Seetaram, N. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of Research Methods in Tourism. Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches: Edward Elgar Publishing. 22. Eusko Jaurlaritza/Gobierno Vasco. (2014). Plan Estrategico del Turismo Vasco 2020. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country 23. Eusko Jaurlaritza/Gobierno Vasco, & Basque Tour Agencia Vasca de Turismo. (2015). Catálogo de iniciativas innovadoras en el Sector Turístico. 24. Eusko Jaurlaritza/Gobierno Vasco, HAZI, & Urkome. (2015). Programa de Desarrollo Rural Comarcal 2015-2020,. 60. 25. Evans, J., A. Karvonen & R. Raven. (2017) Experimental City. London and New York: Routledge. 26. Farsani, N. T., Coelho, C. O. A., & Costa, C. M. (2013). Rural geotourism: A new Tourism Product. Acta Geoturistica, 4(2), 1-10. 27. Farsani, N. T., Coelho, C., Costa, C., & Carvalho, C. N. d. (2011). Geoparks and GeoTourism. Boca Ratón Florida: BrownWalker Press. 28. Geoparkea Euskal Kostaldea Costa Vasca. (2012). Plan de Interpretación del Geoparque. Anteproyecto de la Red de Espacios de Acogida e Interpretación. 29. Geoparkea Euskal Kostaldea Costa Vasca, & Debegesa. (2011). Plan Estratégico Euskal Kostaldeko Geopareka. Resumen Ejecutivo. 30. Gobierno de España & Segittur. (2015). Smart Destinations Report: buiding the future. 31. Gretzel, U., Sigala, M., Xiang, Z., & Koo, C. (2015). Smart tourism: foundations and developments. Electron Markets, 25, 179-188. DOI:10.1007/s12525-015-0196-8 32. Harvey, D. (2016). Culture and cities: the challenge of tourism, Barcelona. Available at: (accessed on 8th February 2017). 33. Hjalager, A.-M. (2015). 100 Innovations that transformed tourism. Journal of Travel Research. SAGE, 54(1), 3-21. DOI:10.1177/0047287513516390 34. Iceland Academy by Inspired by Iceland. (2016) Availablet at:
  13. 13. 13 (accessed on 7th February 2017). 35. Jóhannesson, G.T., Huijbens, E.H. (2010). Tourism in times of crisis: exploring the discourse of tourism development in Iceland. Current Issues in Tourism, 3(5), 419-434. DOI: 36. Karvonen, A. and van Heur, B. (2014). Urban Laboratories: Experiments in Reworking Cities”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(2), 379-392. 37. Keith, M. & Calzada, I. (2016). European Smart Citizens as Decision Makers Rather Thank Data Providers, Urban Transformations ESRC report on 14th November 2016 Workshop entitled ‘(Un)Plugging Data in Smart City-Regions‘. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11175.14240. 38. Llambea, N. (2016). A policy approach to the impact of tourist dwellings in condominiums and neighbourhoods in Barcelona, Urban Research & Practice, DOI: 10.1080/17535069.2017.1250522. 39. Minube (2016). Donde empiezan los viajes by minube. Available at: (accessed on 1st January 2017). 40. Moravec, J. W. (2013). Knowmad Society. Minneapolis: Education Futures. 41. OECD. (2016). OECD Tourism Trends and Policies 2016. Paris: OECD Publising. 42. Peretta, R. (2014). Evaluating Mobile Applications for Urban Tourism. AlmaTourism. 43. Phocuswright. (2016). Mobile, Millennials and Emerging Markets: The Next Wave in Global Travel. 44. Refuga (2016). Travel with entrepreneurs by REFUGA. Available at: (accessed on 1st February 2017). 45. Saxena, G. (2016). Marketing Rural Tourism. Experience and Enterprise. Edward Elgar Publishing. 46. Sinek, S. (2016). Millennials in the Workplace. Available at: (accessed on 1st February 2017). 47. Stone, Brad (2016). The Upstarts: How Uber, Airbnb and the Killer Companies of the New Sillicon Valley are Changing the World. Little, Brown and Company, NY. 48. Sustain Green (2017). Carbon FootPrint Credit Card. Available at: (accessed on 1st January 2017). 49. Telegraph (2016). Mapped: Every single Game of Thrones filming location. Season 1-6. Available at: filming-locations-guide/ (accessed on 7th February 2017). 50. Thackara, J. (2017). El Turista Debe Pagar Más Tasas Para Ahorrárselas al Lugareño in La Vanguardia. Available at: mas-tasas-para-ahorrarselas-al-lugareno.html (accessed on 6th February 2017). 51. Thackara, J. (2005). In the Bubble. Designing in a Complex World. Cambrige MA, London UK: The MIT Press. 52. Thackara, J. (2015). How to thrive in the next economy. Thames & Hudson. 53. The Lord of the Rings Trilogy Filming Locations. New Zealand. (2016). Availablet at: (accessed on 6th February 2017). 54. UNESCO Global Geopark (2017). Available at: sciences/environment/earth-sciences/unesco-global-geoparks/list-of-unesco-global- geoparks/ (accessed on 7th February 2017). 55. UNESCO Global Geoparks & United Nations. (2016). UNESCO Global Geoparks.
  14. 14. 14 Celebrating Earth Heritage, Sustaining Local Communities. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cutural Organisation. 56. UNTWO. (2016). Conceptual Framework. Available at: (accessed on 7th February 2017). 57. UNWTO Organización Mundial del Turismo (2016). 2017 Año Internacional del Turismo Sostenible para el Desarrollo. 58. Urban Transformations. (2017). Experimenting with Urban Living Labs (ULLs) beyond Smart City-Regions. Available at: ulls-beyond-smart-city-regions/#sthash.abaplz7G.dpuf. (accessed on 6th February 2017). 59. Urola Kostako Udal Elkartea & Gura Market In. (2016). Estrategia eta Ekintza Plana. Laburben Exekutiboa. 60. Voltes-Dorta, A., Jiménez, J. L. & Súarez-Alemán, A. (2016) The Impact of ETA’s Dissolution on Domestic Tourism in Spain, Defence and Peace Economics, 27:6, 854-870, DOI: 10.1080/10242694.2015.1025485 61. Wang, D., & Xiang, Z. (2012). The New Landscape of Travel: A Comprehensive Analysis of Smartphone Apps. Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism, 308-319. 62. Wonderful Copenhagen (2017). The End of Tourism as We Know It. 63. World Summit on Sustainable Tourism 2015. (2015). World Summit on Sustainable Tourism +20. Paper presented at the World Summit on Sustainable Tourism 2015, Vitoria- Gasteiz. Available at: content/uploads/2016/05/Carta-Mundial-de-Turismo-Sostenible-20.pdf (accessed on 6th February 2017). 64. World Tourism Organization. (2016). UNWTO Annual Report 2015, UNWTO, Madrid. 65. Zumaiako Udala, & Elhuyar Aholkularitza. (2016). Plan Estratégico ‘Biharko Zumaiarako Boga 2015-2025’. 66. Brickell, K.; Datta, A. (2011). Translocal Geographies; Spaces, Places, Connections, Ashgate, Burlington. 67. Translokal – Academic Entrepreneurship for Policy Making. Available at: (accessed on 9th February 2017). 68. Calzada, I. (2015). Benchmarking Future City-Regions beyond Nation-States, RSRS Regional Studies Regional Science, 2:1, 350-361, DOI: 10.1080/21681376.2015.1046908. Available at: (accessed on 7th February 2017). 69. Casado, A. & Calzada, I. (2015). Demos-Ethos: A Framework to Study the Icelandic and Basque Cases through Critical Social Innovation and Applied Ethics. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2015.1089472. 70. Heller, M.; Pujolar, J.; Duchêne, A. (2014). Linguistic commodification in tourism. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 18/4, 539-566.