2 deus leaflet wp2


Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

2 deus leaflet wp2

  1. 1. DEUS Deployment and Ease Use of wireless Services Network Architecture Main challenges Current infrastructures in buildings and public areas are predominantly based on wired network technologies. Although wired infrastructures have proven to be very reliable, once they have been properly installed, wired solutions are not desired in dynamic environments, where the setting may change from day-to-day. These dynamic environments demand for a specific approach. Where wired networks can survive with a onetime install and a minimum of management, constantly changing networks could be an administrative nightmare. DEUS will prove the opposite by providing an easy configurable, self-healing and easy manageable, flexible wireless network. DEUS approach Delivering services on such flexible networks to users in an efficient way could be the baseline of the DEUS project. As users have various requirements depending on the services they rely on, the network used to provide the needed connectivity should be flexible and versatile. This requires interactions between various kinds of devices and technologies and could easily lead to complicated and hard to manage networks. Within DEUS we demonstrate the opposite by developing an easy to deploy and to use versatile network infrastructure. In DEUS, four different network domains are identified as illustrated in Figure 1: • a wireless backbone, providing the core transport network between all involved components, • a Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN), consisting of low power sensor and actuator devices, interacting with the environment, • deployment of Access Points (AP) at the edges to provide user access to the network, • backend servers used for network management and service provisioning.
  2. 2. DEUS Deployment and Ease Use of wireless Services Autoconfiguration mechanisms ensure that the mesh and WSNs can be set up with a minimum of user intervention. At the same time, security measures are in place to prevent malicious nodes to join the network. Using transparent routing solutions, all four domain are interconnected which makes it possible that: • sensors can be reached by the backend, • WiFi users can connect to the backend and the Internet, • WSN paths can be optimised via the mesh. Figure 1: DEUS logical network components DEUS solutions Backbone Mesh The backbone mesh network consists of a collection of routers which create a secure, multi-hop, autoconfiguring, self-organizing and reliable transport network supporting Quality of Service (QoS). The primary role of this network is to transparently transport data from other connected networks. The links in this mesh can be as well wireless as wired. Wireless clusters can be easily interconnected by wired links to overcome physical barriers as walls or concrete floors. It can even be used to connect mesh networks across various buildings or sites. Hop-by-hop link encryption techniques make eavesdropping on the mesh network useless. The basic OLSR routing protocol has been extended with advanced routing metrics to optimize paths within the network and to introduce a high level of reliability. In the event of link deterioration or node failure, new routes will automatically be created to bypass the failed node or link.
  3. 3. DEUS Deployment and Ease Use of wireless Services Wireless Sensor Network The Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) shares a lot of features with the mesh network: it is autoconfigured, self-organising, multi-hop and supports QoS. At the same time it is quite different from the backbone mesh. By using a modular architecture, the WSN simultaneously supports multiple routing protocols. Depending on the application, a different type of protocol can be used. One protocol will support convergecast routing, having routes to the sink available at all times, while other applications, like e.g. voice calls, need a reactive protocol which will set up a path and possibly reserve resources to guarantee a certain level of QoS. The diversity of traffic this WSN needs to handle also calls for a specific hybrid MAC which has been developed within DEUS. This MAC is able to dynamically enable links between sensors and schedule slots such that QoS can be supported. Global Routing The purpose of Global Routing is twofold: • Optimise sensor paths by combining sensor and mesh links in sensor to sensor communications, • Connect WNS and non-WSN devices (like the backend servers or regular mesh nodes). In the first case, long paths through a sensor cloud, as illustrated in Figure 3 can be avoided by routing to the nearest mesh gateway supporting global routing. Global routing will set up a path to the mesh gateway nearest to the destination device, as shown in Figure 4. Doing so, power and bandwidth can be saved on intermediate sensor nodes and latency on the path between the two devices is lowered which is especially interesting in the case of voice routing. The transparent nature of global routing, gateway device advertise themselves as one hop neighbours, avoid specific changes to the WSN routing protocol. As such, global routing is also used to transparently connect disjoint WSN clouds, constructing one large WSN cloud which is easily managed and controlled. Finally, Global Routing also preserves QoS requests. Both WSN and Mesh support QoS and Global Routing will make sure that WSN levels will be translated and packets adequately marked when entering the Backbone Mesh.
  4. 4. DEUS Deployment and Ease Use of wireless Services Figure 3: global routing path Figure 2: Sensor path Global routing also interacts with default IPv4 and IPv6 networks (Figure 4), e.g. from the backend domain. The WSN itself uses 6LowPAN, an IP like networking scheme tailored to low power networks. It has been designed with IPv6 compatibility in mind, but in DEUS, we bring it into practice. Global Routing will bridge between the more static routing paths in the IPv6 domain and the reactive routing within the WSN. Finally, a NAT- PT solution will interconnect IPv4 and IPv6 networks, and thus IPv4 to the sensors using global routing as intermediary. Figure 4: Sensor connectivity
  5. 5. DEUS Deployment and Ease Use of wireless Services WiFi Access Points Access points can be deployed on the mesh routers. Although strictly separated logic is used, some close integration between mesh and access network is introduced to support mobility. The presence of clients on the access network is propagated within the mesh network at a minimum of signalling cost, but with the result of transparent mobility across the access network. Clients moving from one access point to another will remain connected without the need of a specific mobility protocol at the client side. DEUS Proof of Concept implementation This architectural concept is the basis of the set-up of the different use cases demonstrated in the Deus project. Project partners In cooperation with IBBT research groups UGent - IBCN http://www.ibcn.intec.ugent.be UGent - WiCa http://www.wica.intec.ugent.be UA - PATS http://www.pats.ua.ac.be KU Leuven – DistriNet http://www.distrinet.cs.kuleuven.be KU Leuven – CUO http://www.soc.kuleuven.be/com/mediac/cuo UHasselt – EDM http://www.edm.uhasselt.be/