Successfully reported this slideshow.

Out of Home Care Standards in Canada, Ireland and the UK

0

Share

1 of 18
1 of 18

Out of Home Care Standards in Canada, Ireland and the UK

0

Share

Download to read offline

Presentation to the Association of Children\\’s Welfare Agencies conference in Sydney, Australia, August 4, 2010.

Presentation to the Association of Children\\’s Welfare Agencies conference in Sydney, Australia, August 4, 2010.

More Related Content

Related Audiobooks

Free with a 30 day trial from Scribd

See all

Out of Home Care Standards in Canada, Ireland and the UK

  1. 1. Out of Home Care Standards in Canada, Ireland and the United Kingdom Iain Matheson (Wellington, New Zealand) Association of Children’s Welfare Agencies Conference 2-4 August, 2010 Sydney, Australia
  2. 2. Presentation Overview  Three contexts  Findings from international research into foster care standards  Discussion of some issues in relation to the UK, Canada, and Ireland:  OOHC system  Sets of foster care and residential care standards  Key features of standards
  3. 3. Context One Matheson, I. (2009). Foster care standards: A four country study. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Child and Foster Care Federation.  Selection of Aus., Can., Ire. and UK  Mixed methods approach  Literature review  Analysis of 31 sets of standards in 18 jurisdictions  38 telephone interviews across 12 jurisdictions  Sampling  Jurisdictions - national/state/provincial/territorial
  4. 4. Context Two  Quality4Children standards for out-of-home child care in Europe  Guidelines for the Alternative Care of Children (formerly UN Guidelines for the Appropriate Use and Conditions of Alternative Care for Children)  National Framework for Protecting Australia’s Children 2009-2020 and development of National Standards for Out of Home Care
  5. 5. Context Three standard /'stænded/ n. & adj. —n. 1 an object or quality or measure serving as a basis or example or principle to which others conform or should conform or by which the accuracy or quality of others is judged (by present-day standards). 2 a the degree of excellence etc. required for a particular purpose (not up to standard), b average quality (of a low standard). 3 the ordinary procedure, or quality or design of a product, without added or novel features. 4 a distinctive flag, esp. the flag of a cavalry regiment as distinct from the colours of an infantry regiment. 5 a an upright support, b an upright water or gas pipe. 6 a a tree or shrub that stands alone without support. b a shrub grafted on an upright stem and trained in tree form (standard rose). 7 a document specifying nationally or internationally agreed properties for manufactured goods etc. (British Standard). 8 a thing recognized as a model for imitation etc. 9 a tune or song of established popularity. 10 a system by which the value of a currency is denned in terms of gold or silver or both. b the prescribed proportion of the weight of fine metal in gold or silver coins. 11 a measure for timber, equivalent to 165 cu. ft. (4.7 cubic metres). 12 Brit. hist. a grade of classification in elementary schools, — adj. 1 serving or used as a standard (a standard size). 2 of a normal or prescribed quality or size etc. 3 having recognized and permanent value; authoritative (the standard book on the subject). 4 (of language) conforming to established educated usage (Standard English). multiple standard a standard of value obtained by averaging the prices of a number of products. raise a standard take up arms; rally support (raised the standard of revolt), standard-bearer 1 a soldier who carries a standard. 2 a prominent leader in a cause (Oxford English Dictionary).
  6. 6. Foster Care Standards: A Four Country Study Findings 1: Almost all jurisdictions in the study had published foster care standards - some had more than one set. 2: In most jurisdictions, the publishing of sets of foster care standards was a very recent development. 3: There were considerable differences across the sets of standards. 4: The context in each jurisdiction was critically important to how the standards were shaped.
  7. 7. Foster Care Standards: A Four Country Study Findings...continued 5: Six types of standards identified:  Best Practice  Expected Practice  Minimum Practice  Practice Principles  Ambiguous  Mixed. 6: Interviewees saw standards as a positive development but...
  8. 8. UK OOHC Systems • England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland • Local authorities provide care and also purchase from NGOs and a large private sector • Very strong central government involvement • Some current practice and policy issues – Professionalisation of foster care – Kin care levels traditionally low but growing fast in some areas – Strong ‘current’ focus upon integrated working, leaving care and education – Rights of children and young people – Current budget cuts
  9. 9. UK Standards • First Key standards in leaving care, 1996 (England & Wales) • UK national standards for foster care, 1999 (UK) • National care standards: Foster care and family placement services, 2002 (England) • Children’s Homes: National Minimum Standards. Children's Homes Regulations, 2002 (England) • Fostering services: National minimum standards of foster care, 2003 (Wales) • National care standards: Foster care and family placement services, 2005 (Scotland) • National standards in leaving care, 2007 (England) • Training, support & development standards for foster care, 2007 (England) • National care standards: care homes for children and young people, 2005 (Scotland)
  10. 10. Characteristics of UK Standards • Wide range and mix • Includes statutory standards and comprehensive registration and inspection regime • Different bodies in each country, e.g. the Office for Standards in Education, Children's Services and Skills (England) • Statutory standards are minimum standards although grading systems have recently been introduced (England, Scotland) • Statutory foster care standards focus upon the fostering service as an organisation – written in first person to children/young people and foster carers (Scotland) • UK national standards for foster care (1999) still in use?
  11. 11. Republic of Ireland OOHS System • Recently re-structured • Care delivered by central government (Health Services Executive), NGO sector and a very small private sector • Central government (HIQA) inspects residential facilities and fostering services • Historically more reliant on residential care • Some current practice and policy issues – The Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse (Ryan report) – Budgets – Kin care – Asylum seekers
  12. 12. Republic of Ireland Standards National Standards for Children's Residential Centres (2001) National standards for special care units (n.d.) National minimum standards for fostering services (2003) Draft national quality standards for residential and foster care services for children and young people (2010)
  13. 13. Characteristics of Republic of Ireland Standards • Current (2003) fostering standards have a lot of strengths but there were some implementation issues • New draft standards have integrated residential and foster care • New draft standards strike a balance between articulating high level standards and outcomes, and providing clear, detailed and substantive criteria • Awaiting outcome of the consultation exercise
  14. 14. Canadian OOHC Systems • 13 Provinces and Territories – significant diversity • Care delivered by Ministries/Depts., Health Boards, Children’s Aid Societies and First Nations agencies • Very limited Central government role in OOHC • Strong role for third party accreditation bodies for residential and foster care • Some current practice and policy issues – Professionalisation of foster care – Growth in kin care – Foster family recruitment – Care of aboriginal children and young people
  15. 15. Canadian Standards Standards of Excellence for Family Foster Care Services, 1995 (CWLA) Provincial and territorial standards - various External accreditation standards (including): • Canadian Accreditation Council accreditation process & standards manual, (2008) • Council on Accreditation standards, (2010)
  16. 16. Characteristics of Standards Provincial foster care standards tend to: – Have developed incrementally and be relatively ‘low key’ – be integrated into the government organisation – foster family practise management tools and – have limited aggregated monitoring and reporting in place External accreditation – Includes Council on Accreditation and Canadian Accreditation Council – British Columbia and Alberta require that any agency contracted by the government to offer services to children be accredited Others – Licensing standards – Residential complaint standards, for example as developed by the Office of the Child and Youth Advocate in Ontario
  17. 17. Ten Personal Thoughts on Good OOHC Standards 1: The purpose is clear and the 7: Support with funding and standards are consistent with this associated infrastructure. stated purpose. 8: Clear logic model and 2: Part of a package of integrated monitoring/evaluation measures. framework. 3: Indigenous children central. 9: Build upon our evidence base 4: Develop collaboratively. and what we know as 5: Recognise some differences practitioners, managers and between residential and foster researchers. care and also foster care and kin 10: Don’t duck the hard issues care. e.g. relationships and warmth. 6: Include aftercare.
  18. 18. Thanks! For further information, a copy of this presentation or a copy of Foster care standards: A four country, please contact Iain Matheson at iain@mathesonassociates.co.nz

×