Network of Excellence in Internet Science Kick-off Meeting Brussels, 21-22 December 2011 Chris Marsden (Essex) FP7-ICT-201...
Audience Participation! <ul><ul><li>While you watch this PPT: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>send a short email about your...
WP Objectives <ul><ul><li>Regulatory and governance mechanisms behind development of Internet standards.  </li></ul></ul><...
Partners in JRA4  <ul><li>Total Effort 26.5 months (530 days) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Socio-legal studies/coordination/deliv...
Tasks in JRA4 <ul><ul><li>R4.1 Overview of regulatory and governance methodologies </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>R4.2 Catalog...
R4.1 Overview of methodologies <ul><ul><li>Essex, UPMC, Savoie, Warw, Oslo, NEXA, UNIBO, CNR, Stockholm, LSE </li></ul></u...
Task R4.2 Cataloguing governance tools <ul><ul><ul><li>UESSEX, NEXA, UoS, CNR </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Development ...
<ul><ul><li>Goal not only to present and understand the various methodologies,  </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>but also cl...
Task R4.3 Standards body case studies  <ul><ul><li>NEXA, LSE, UiO </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Construct a living catalogue:...
Task R4.3: Legitimacy Gap Lessons <ul><ul><li>Cases studies can represent ability to  </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Devel...
R.4.4 Map New Participants in Standards Making <ul><ul><li>Civil Society, Wider Participation  </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul>...
Task R4.5 Cross-Mapping governance <ul><ul><ul><li>UESSEX, UPMC, UoS, WARW, UoP, MLS </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>cross...
WP Action List for the 1st Year <ul><ul><li>Task R4.1: series of events and workshops  </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>with...
Deliverable R4.1 Outline overviews of Tasks R4.1-R4.4 M12 <ul><ul><li>Full first overview of  </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><...
Interdependencies with other WPs <ul><ul><li>Outcomes include strong collaboration with SEA2 on ICT standard-setting insti...
WP Impact <ul><ul><li>Outreach to social science researchers via long-established connections to the  </li></ul></ul><ul><...
Ultimate objective of JRA4  <ul><ul><li>To disseminate and collaborate research methodologies in new methods of regulation...
Issues to be discussed and decided Brussels, December 21-22, 2011 EINS Kick-off Meeting <ul><ul><li>How do the various sub...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Network of Excellence in Internet Science (JRA4, Governance, Regulation & Standards, C. Marsden, UESSEX)

330 views

Published on

The Network of Excellence in Internet Science aims to achieve a deeper multidisciplinary understanding of the Internet as a societal and technological artefact.
More information: http://internet-science.eu/
Twitter: @i_scienceEU

Published in: Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
330
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
5
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Network of Excellence in Internet Science (JRA4, Governance, Regulation & Standards, C. Marsden, UESSEX)

  1. 1. Network of Excellence in Internet Science Kick-off Meeting Brussels, 21-22 December 2011 Chris Marsden (Essex) FP7-ICT-2011.1.6-288021 EINS JRA4: Governance, Regulation & Standards  
  2. 2. Audience Participation! <ul><ul><li>While you watch this PPT: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>send a short email about your experience with: </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Standards bodies </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>What you did, what the result was, other actors (note SEA2 work ongoing) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Standards case study </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Any unusual/counter-intuitive example - hold-ups, forum shifting </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Examples of civil society involvement (and multiple hat wearing) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Standards literature </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Different literatures in each discipline </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Legal, social science, economic, comp.sci. etc/ </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Email cmars@essex.ac.uk Thank you! </li></ul></ul>Brussels, December 21-22, 2011 EINS Kick-off Meeting
  3. 3. WP Objectives <ul><ul><li>Regulatory and governance mechanisms behind development of Internet standards. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>to draw lessons from social scientific analysis </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>to ensure the appropriateness of the standards </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>as the Internet gets deeper into the social fabric. </li></ul></ul></ul>Brussels, December 21-22, 2011 EINS Kick-off Meeting
  4. 4. Partners in JRA4 <ul><li>Total Effort 26.5 months (530 days) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Socio-legal studies/coordination/deliverables  </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>ESSEX 90 days </li></ul></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Economics and game theory </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>WARW 40 days </li></ul></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Inter-disciplinary information studies drawing on socio-economic and political analysis </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Total 430 days = 63% of research effort </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>NEXA 80days, LU 60days, IMDEA 50days </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>40days: IBBT, Savoie, UPMC, Institute of Informatics and Telematics of CNR, Stockholm </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>20days: UNIBO, Delft  </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Draws on inter-disciplinary approaches </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>LSE 100 days (note reallocation from JRA6) </li></ul></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>UiO 20 days </li></ul></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Oslo contribution relies on compilation of existing research/analysis </li></ul></ul></ul></ul></ul>Brussels, December 21-22, 2011 EINS Kick-off Meeting
  5. 5. Tasks in JRA4 <ul><ul><li>R4.1 Overview of regulatory and governance methodologies </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>R4.2 Cataloguing governance tools for standards </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>R4.3 Standards body case studies </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>R.4.4 Map New Participants in Standards Task </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>R4.5 Cross-Mapping governance </li></ul></ul>Brussels, December 21-22, 2011 EINS Kick-off Meeting
  6. 6. R4.1 Overview of methodologies <ul><ul><li>Essex, UPMC, Savoie, Warw, Oslo, NEXA, UNIBO, CNR, Stockholm, LSE </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Develop multi-disciplinary catalogue of methodologies </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>To aid better understanding of challenges to better participative decision-making, </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>including open-source governance approaches  </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>e.g. open-source standards for hardware as well as software </li></ul></ul></ul>Brussels, December 21-22, 2011 EINS Kick-off Meeting
  7. 7. Task R4.2 Cataloguing governance tools <ul><ul><ul><li>UESSEX, NEXA, UoS, CNR </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Development of tools that help </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Scientifically designed legitimate governance </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Towards a better understanding </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>of needs and requirements for Internet design </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>based on broad socio-political buy-in </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>(or at least better informed acquiescence) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>in the design process and outcomes. </li></ul></ul></ul>Brussels, December 21-22, 2011 EINS Kick-off Meeting
  8. 8. <ul><ul><li>Goal not only to present and understand the various methodologies, </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>but also clarify their standing, </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>specific policy needs they address, </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>gap analysis to understand growing legitimacy problems and potential solution or bypass. </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Leads to regulatory governance taxonomy </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>various methodologies classified and understood. </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>drive governance tool development JRA4.2 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>based on dedicated use cases in Task R4.3 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>cross-mapping in Task R4.4 </li></ul></ul>Brussels, December 21-22, 2011 EINS Kick-off Meeting
  9. 9. Task R4.3 Standards body case studies <ul><ul><li>NEXA, LSE, UiO </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Construct a living catalogue: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>standards bodies and their functions. </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>both telecoms and Internet standards, </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Complex interplays and trade-offs between the various institutions </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>design choices relating to software and hardware, to privacy, security, and extensibility. </li></ul></ul></ul>Brussels, December 21-22, 2011 EINS Kick-off Meeting
  10. 10. Task R4.3: Legitimacy Gap Lessons <ul><ul><li>Cases studies can represent ability to </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Develop study of governance and regulation </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>of the Internet as a whole, </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>other rapidly developing technology-led sectors </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>with a potential legitimacy gap between  </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>best practice design and  </li></ul></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>socio-political trust in expert design. </li></ul></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Essential governance questions identified </li></ul></ul>Brussels, December 21-22, 2011 EINS Kick-off Meeting
  11. 11. R.4.4 Map New Participants in Standards Making <ul><ul><li>Civil Society, Wider Participation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>UNIBO, NEXA, LSE, MLS, LJU </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Identify potential new participants </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>success factors of differing approaches </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>including alternative or similar examples, </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>to the well-known US examples </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Creative Commons, </li></ul></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Electronic Frontier Foundation, </li></ul></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Free Software Foundation, </li></ul></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Centre for Democracy and Technology, </li></ul></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Free Press </li></ul></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>within the European standards sphere. </li></ul></ul></ul>Brussels, December 21-22, 2011 EINS Kick-off Meeting
  12. 12. Task R4.5 Cross-Mapping governance <ul><ul><ul><li>UESSEX, UPMC, UoS, WARW, UoP, MLS </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>cross-mapping governance methodologies and policies by crossing them with, </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>categories of non/human actors defining and executing them </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>the layer at which they operate. </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>3-dimensional matrix analysed/assessed  </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>for compliance with democratic values ,  </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>e.g. transparency, legitimacy, accountability, fundamental rights. </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Gap analysis may identify lacunae </li></ul></ul>Brussels, December 21-22, 2011 EINS Kick-off Meeting
  13. 13. WP Action List for the 1st Year <ul><ul><li>Task R4.1: series of events and workshops </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>with the relevant JRAs </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>with external communities both on- and off-line. </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Milestone R4.1 (M12) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Initial outline of catalogues </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>plus full draft of methodologies; </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Hypotheses for governance & regulation taxonomy </li></ul></ul>Brussels, December 21-22, 2011 EINS Kick-off Meeting
  14. 14. Deliverable R4.1 Outline overviews of Tasks R4.1-R4.4 M12 <ul><ul><li>Full first overview of </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>regulatory and governance methodologies, </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>test candidate case studies for examination </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Tentative hypotheses as to a governance and regulation taxonomy presented </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>strawman for further refinement and analysis </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>moving from Task R4.1/4.3 to explore within Task 4.2. </li></ul></ul></ul>Brussels, December 21-22, 2011 EINS Kick-off Meeting
  15. 15. Interdependencies with other WPs <ul><ul><li>Outcomes include strong collaboration with SEA2 on ICT standard-setting institutions </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Also JRAs dealing with standards making </li></ul></ul>Brussels, December 21-22, 2011 EINS Kick-off Meeting
  16. 16. WP Impact <ul><ul><li>Outreach to social science researchers via long-established connections to the </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>European (EuroCPR), </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>United States (TPRC), and </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>international academic communities </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>E.g. GIGANET, IAMCR, International Telecommunications Society </li></ul></ul></ul></ul>Brussels, December 21-22, 2011 EINS Kick-off Meeting
  17. 17. Ultimate objective of JRA4 <ul><ul><li>To disseminate and collaborate research methodologies in new methods of regulation – </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>including stakeholder dialogues and choices that affect the present and future Internets -  </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>considering concerns from various stakeholders and design communities. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>E.g. participation, democratic values, network growth and complexity, interoperability, security, privacy </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Note importance of close collaboration with SEA2 </li></ul></ul>Brussels, December 21-22, 2011 EINS Kick-off Meeting
  18. 18. Issues to be discussed and decided Brussels, December 21-22, 2011 EINS Kick-off Meeting <ul><ul><li>How do the various sub-tasks fit together  </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>i.e. methodology development, stakeholder mapping, case studies  </li></ul></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>How are the practical elements of these tasks divided  </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>does the same person/team contribute to all of these tasks related to a specific set of case studies, or are they more separate? </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>How will workflow be organized  </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>e.g. linking case studies with analytic activities that follow </li></ul></ul></ul></ul></ul>

×