Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Clo session coaching - group notes 092810 final

922 views

Published on

Published in: Business, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Clo session coaching - group notes 092810 final

  1. 1. CLO Session – Coaching September 2010 Group Notes Topic #1: Pre-Engagement 1. What are the typical reasons that coaching is considered as a development intervention? 2. Who is the client? 3. How are coaches selected? 4. How important is a coaches technical expertise vs. industry experience? 5. How is HR, direct manager, coachee or other constituencies involved in the coaching engagement design? 6. What else? Reasons • Succession planning • Client is fully engaged • Enhance improve performance • Address/ identify behavioral derailers • Union avoidance • Strategy within leadership development process Tech Expertise VS Industry Experience • Incident based • Competency gaps & strengths based • Both *On boarding new hires/ new acquisition of a company • Retention tool • Building competency • Change in organization Client • Company/ Organization • Line leaders • Executives • Upper Management • Anyone
  2. 2. Selection • External • Volunteer executives • Prescriptive • Turning retirees into coaches  With interest & passion • Tech. Expertise  For hand skills • Ind. Expertise  For soft skills • Selection  Past success • Selection  Coachee has inputs (Poll Strategy) Topic #2: Coaching Application 1. How does the coaching engagement transpire? 2. How long are typical coaching engagements? Shortest or longest? 3. What assessments (i.e. multi-rater and personality) are utilized? 4. What kind of “check in” or progress updates are employed? 5. What else? How does the coaching engagement transpire? • In person • Phone • Videoconference • Anytime anyplace & scheduled Assessments • 360 • E.Q • MRG • DISC • Personality profiling (e.g. Myers Briggs) • Skills assessment • Strength profiling • Birkman • Winslow • Hogan • Multi-rater • Interview technique • Part of talent management process
  3. 3. • Part of performance management process Engagement Length • 6 + months. • 1 – 6 months (i.e. as short as 2 hours) • Program based • Relationship based • Program based- employees does follow-up coach/ coachee • Deserved behavioral change Typical Engagements • Onboarding new hires • Supporting partners not necessary in your line of business • Gradual ascension in intensity of coaching (i.e. hard to soft skills, task to strategy) Topic #3: Evaluation 1. Do you evaluate coaching engagement effectiveness? 2. How are coaching engagements evaluated? 3. What areas of the coaching field merit further exploration? 4. What else? Evaluating Coaches • Effectiveness – yes! • Methods – 360 (loose) • Areas for exploration – Prepare coaches • Evaluate ROI|| What else? • Associate #2 & #3 • How to change mindset from punishment • Tie to performance Evaluation • Metrics that are individualized to leader • Observed behaviors Further Exploration • Certification
  4. 4. • Prof. Assoc. • Internal Vs. External Who evaluates coaching effectiveness? • Coach? • Coachee? • Coachee’s mgr.? • Coachee’s direct reports? • HR generalist? Is there tangible evidence that coaching works?

×