Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Anzats 2011


Published on

Published in: Education, Spiritual
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Anzats 2011

  2. 2. Behind the Project <ul><li>Uncovering Theology 2008 </li></ul><ul><ul><li>more mature experienced students </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>transformative experience in theological education </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Aim </li></ul><ul><ul><li>to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the undergraduate theological education curriculum in providing an increasingly diverse population of theological students with a transformative education </li></ul></ul>
  3. 3. Scope <ul><li>All theological HEPs in Australia </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Universities </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>ACU, CSU, Flinders, Murdoch, Newcastle, Notre Dame </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Consortia </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>ACD, ACT, MCD, SCD </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Stand-alone HEPs </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Alphacrucis, Avondale, CHC, Harvest, Harvest West, Tabor Adelaide, Tabor Victoria, Moore, PBC, Wesley </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>50 teaching campuses </li></ul></ul>
  4. 4. Research Methods <ul><ul><li>Literature survey on transformative learning, with particular reference to theological programs </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Historical and Current Curriculum Document Analysis </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Student Surveys, Focus Groups, Interviews </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Faculty Interviews </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Church Leaders, Employers, Graduate Interviews </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Workshop </li></ul></ul>
  5. 5. Findings to Date <ul><li>Curriculum Development </li></ul><ul><ul><li>historical </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>current </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Student Profile </li></ul><ul><ul><li>at entry </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>initial expectations </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>transformative experiences </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>life experience </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>most valued subject areas </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Learning and Teaching </li></ul><ul><ul><li>institutional focus </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>content, skills, methods </li></ul></ul>
  6. 6. Curriculum Development 1973-2010 <ul><li>High degree of uniformity in course design and content </li></ul><ul><ul><li>biblical studies + systematic theology + limited church history </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>+ philosophy in Catholic tradition </li></ul></ul><ul><li>1990s-2010 </li></ul><ul><ul><li>inclusion of ministry skills, especially in BMin programs </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>more in Bible colleges than in mainstream denominational systems </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>mainly class-room teaching with some field placement or practical project work </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>increase in Supervised Field Education </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>still relatively minor electives </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>limited pedagogical rigour </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>No clear evidence of intentional or strategic connection with a student’s prior life experience </li></ul><ul><li>No clear evidence of intentional transformative learning </li></ul>
  7. 7. Student Profile: at entry <ul><li>Age </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Very few under 20 (6%) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Most between 20-40 (64%) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Prior Education </li></ul><ul><ul><li>45.5% have prior bachelor or post-graduate degree </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>27% have post-secondary certificate/diploma </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Assumptive Tensions </li></ul><ul><ul><li>all are blank sheets with no prior knowledge or study skills </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>all are at same stage of readiness for theological study   </li></ul></ul>
  8. 8. Students’ Initial Expectations <ul><li>Most common aspiration </li></ul><ul><ul><li>acquisition of deeper theological/biblical knowledge accompanied by personal spiritual development </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Other </li></ul><ul><ul><li>acquisition of practical ministry skills </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>but not outcome of paid vocational employment </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>interpersonal relations & cultural issues are not as important as knowledge and personal development  </li></ul></ul><ul><li>In terms of goals , cognitive learning & skills development are more significant than personal transformation </li></ul><ul><ul><li>attractiveness of “transformation” may not be as strong as suggested by the colleges’ promotional material </li></ul></ul>
  9. 9. Students’ Transformative Experiences <ul><li>Personal transformation has been a common outcome of theological study </li></ul><ul><ul><li>reaching full potential rather than radical change </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Intense personal challenge involved in critical study of sacred texts and doctrines </li></ul><ul><ul><li>with resultant strengthening of levels of faith and tolerance </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>but also lack of spiritual support for such intense struggle </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Expansion of intellectual horizons and critical thinking </li></ul><ul><ul><li>broadening of tolerance towards other theological & ecclesial positions </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Greater degree of simultaneous humility and confidence in terms of personal identity and role  </li></ul>
  10. 10. Emergent challenges <ul><ul><li>Should such transformative development be </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>allowed (by happenstance) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>fostered (by encouragement) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>or strategized (by planning)? </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>(How) should schools support such personal struggles? </li></ul></ul>
  11. 11. Students’ Life Experience <ul><li>Little evidence of any intentional connection between theological study and prior life experience </li></ul><ul><ul><li>only occasional and incidental intersection </li></ul></ul><ul><li>More intentional (though not necessarily strategic) linkage with current experience </li></ul><ul><ul><li>esp in areas of ministry </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>esp associated with field placements, integrated with or parallel to the degree program </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Experiential application happened more via the community of theological education than by the content of the curriculum </li></ul><ul><ul><li>lecturers and student cohort very significant agents </li></ul></ul>
  12. 12. Emergent challenges <ul><ul><li>(How) can prior life experience be used as an enrichment springboard for theological studies? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>(How) can integration of contemporary life situations be expanded beyond the currently dominant preparation for professional ministry? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>(How) can the role of the theological community be used more strategically in such integration? </li></ul></ul>
  13. 20. Emergent themes <ul><li>Cognitive aspirations </li></ul><ul><li>(trans)formative experiences </li></ul><ul><li>Pivotal role of lecturer and theological community in transformative experiences </li></ul><ul><li>Need of pastoral support throughout transformative experiences </li></ul><ul><li>Issues of modern pedagogy </li></ul>
  14. 21. Learning and Teaching Institutional Focus <ul><li>Need to define the primary raison d’être of your institution </li></ul><ul><li>In terms of student development, which area is the most important focus in your school? </li></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Biblical/theological knowledge </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Practical ministry skills </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Personal growth </li></ul></ul></ul>
  15. 22. Balance in Curriculum <ul><ul><li>Content </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Historical truth </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Contemporary world </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Skills </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Professional performance </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Personal applications and engagements </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Methods </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Scope for creativity </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Modern pedagogy </li></ul></ul></ul>
  16. 23. Problem Solving Appreciative Inquiry “ Felt Need” Identification of a Problem Analysis of Causes Analysis of Possible Solutions Action Plan (Treatment) Appreciating Valuing the Best of “What Is” or “Where I have come from” Envisioning “What Might Be” Or “What I might become” Dialoguing “What Should Be” or “What I should become” Innovating “What Will Be” Or “What I will become” Basic Assumption: Person Has/Organization Is a problem to be solved Basic Assumption: Person is a Continuing Work in Process With Past/Existing Successes that can be built on
  17. 24. Still to come <ul><li>Stakeholder Interviews September-October </li></ul><ul><ul><li>2 Faculty; Academic Board Chair/Dean of School; Church Leaders/Employers; Graduate </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Workshop </li></ul><ul><ul><li>April 2012; Dissemination of Findings; Articulation of Best Practices </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Or Good Practices in Various Contexts </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>Communications </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Brochure; Newsletter </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Website; Blog </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Final Publication late 2012   </li></ul></ul>