Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Upcoming SlideShare
TAIPAN: Automatic Property Mapping for Tabular Data
Next
Download to read offline and view in fullscreen.

0

Share

Download to read offline

HOBBIT Survey results

Download to read offline

A presentation of the HOBBIT Survey Results
(This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 688227.)

Related Books

Free with a 30 day trial from Scribd

See all

Related Audiobooks

Free with a 30 day trial from Scribd

See all
  • Be the first to like this

HOBBIT Survey results

  1. 1. HOBBIT Survey results Ruben Taelman Horizon 2020 GA No 688227 01/12/2016–30/11/2018 ESWC 2016 Crete, Greece June 22, 2016 Ruben Taelman (iMinds) HOBBITSurvey results June 22, 2016 1 / 1
  2. 2. Goal In what areas are organizations active? What do people expect from benchmarks? How are benchmarks being used? Ruben Taelman (iMinds) HOBBITSurvey results June 22, 2016 2 / 1
  3. 3. Participant profiles 50 participants Profile Count Solution provider 39 Technology user 39 Scientific community 40 Ruben Taelman (iMinds) HOBBITSurvey results June 22, 2016 3 / 1
  4. 4. Linked Data areas Evenly distributed: Storage / Querying Interlinking Classification / Enrichment Discovery Extraction Reasoning Solution providers mainly active in storage and querying. Ruben Taelman (iMinds) HOBBITSurvey results June 22, 2016 4 / 1
  5. 5. Linked Data areas Other areas: Reporting Visualization Ruben Taelman (iMinds) HOBBITSurvey results June 22, 2016 5 / 1
  6. 6. Key performance indicators Correctness Accuracy (precision, recall, F-measure, mean reciprocal rank) Runtime / Speed Scalability Memory usage CPU usage Ruben Taelman (iMinds) HOBBITSurvey results June 22, 2016 6 / 1
  7. 7. Benchmarks 48% already evaluates software using a benchmark 78% of benchmarking done for storage and querying, much less for other domains Ruben Taelman (iMinds) HOBBITSurvey results June 22, 2016 7 / 1
  8. 8. Datasets Types of datasets: 22% synthetic data 46% real data 32% both 66% is or can be made public! Ruben Taelman (iMinds) HOBBITSurvey results June 22, 2016 8 / 1
  9. 9. Dataset sizes In number of triples. Ruben Taelman (iMinds) HOBBITSurvey results June 22, 2016 9 / 1
  10. 10. Survey still open! http://goo.gl/forms/1iRIoG4Xpb Ruben Taelman (iMinds) HOBBITSurvey results June 22, 2016 10 / 1

A presentation of the HOBBIT Survey Results (This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 688227.)

Views

Total views

401

On Slideshare

0

From embeds

0

Number of embeds

6

Actions

Downloads

2

Shares

0

Comments

0

Likes

0

×