Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Men Are Being Chemically Castrated By Sunscreen and Everyday Plastics

270 views

Published on

Being an older male it is easy to see that today's males are lacking in the testosterone department. This news that men are literally being chemically castrated by everyday chemicals only helps to validate this theory.

Hippie vs Jock Fitness and Health
https://www.youtube.com/user/hippievsjocksfitness
http://vsjock.com/?hippievsjockyoutube

Published in: Health & Medicine
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Men Are Being Chemically Castrated By Sunscreen and Everyday Plastics

  1. 1. Men Are Being Chemically castrated By Sunscreen and Everyday Plastics
  2. 2. Low male fertility caused by sunscreen, everyday plastics - scientist Low fertility rates have been blamed on everything from laptops to cycling - but a scientist now claims that other common items are also diminishing men's chances of fatherhood. /
  3. 3. Low male fertility caused by sunscreen, everyday plastics - scientist From sunscreen to trying pans, he says men aren’t as safe as , thevh ! . I
  4. 4. According to Danish researcher Niels Jorgensen, certain chemicals are responsible for low fertility rates - and those chemicals are found all around us. "Modern life is having an impact because we are exposed to so many chemicals and we don't know what they do, " said Jorgensen, a consultant at the Department of Growth and Reproduction at Rigshospitalet in Copenhagen. as quoted by The Times. THIS MODERN LIFE. ’ HUME PLAY WORK ' ‘ ' / / r 4 ‘A
  5. 5. Jorgensen’s remarks follow the scientist’s 15-year study of almost 5,000 Danish men, with an average age of 19. He found that only 25 NL mil psrrr Law ape or". at N "Will-' v~ I'll Au" '1" II (Jun 3;‘-El! ‘ £_'7'7 p. ':gr= ::. ~rr rrionmy " V » percent had really good 5% I I : semen quality - that IS ‘' 3- A - , . shape and concentration of count or orp 00, ' urn " r, r , ’ , . _ - _. _ - ' , r r '/ - , serm. f' .
  6. 6. Meanwhile, about 15 percent had very poor quality of sperm. "You would predict they would need some kind of fertility treatment to become 1 fahes, " he id j. .
  7. 7. Meanwhile, about 15 percent had very poor quality of sperm. could expect a prolonged wait to P1‘: 3c"3N'1' father children. 9 ? A further 27 percent
  8. 8. Jorgensen made his remarks at the European Society of Human Reproduction and EmbryoIogy’s annual conference in Lisbon this week. Major Health Hazards of Phthalates The chemica| s of concern afe known 0 P m t r birth 2 - 0 8Ifthad: l:cts of male sex organs - seduced remmy everything from shower curtains to 0 Prostate and testicular ancer . - Learning disabilities C car dashboards and cleaning ' 8eh= vr‘°rvr°b1°m= materials - products that most men 0 Asthma and allergies . . . . E, .., ,., .,. .,, .. 9.. .. come into contact with on a daily - Breast growth in boys 0 Obesity and diabetes : — ' '
  9. 9. Jorgensen also believes PFC’s are "extremely harmful. " I These are found in everyday items such 9‘ as non-stick pans and waterproof jackets.
  10. 10. While throwing away a particular coat or upgrading to a different frying pan may not seem too drastic, Jorgensen did have a more controversial suggestion - abandoning the use of sunscreen. "E69.. . "we are advised to protect ourselves u-Ilsheam ""°'°*-S» ‘I g with these sunblocks but it seems " e rl les _ "t m-«och§n3:m: _. “ when you go to the laboratory and test aCl‘O50l'|1( some of these chemicals they can interfere with the sperm lunction, " Jorgensen said. 7 “ivnopiece TKIL
  11. 11. ''If I was to advise my own family, I would say don’t use it, " he added. But it's not just grown men that are at risk from the allegedly dangerous substances - unborn boys are thought to be rticularly T tdan er. I
  12. 12. This has led Jorgensen to also advise against the use of sunscreen and make-up for pregnant women. as those substances could negatively impact the future sperm production of male ‘fetuses. ‘P ‘Tit But Jorgensen’s suggestion of ditching Drfa‘ fhe sunscreen has been criticized by Dr. Chris Tome Flower of the UK's Cosmetics, Toiletry and sunscreen Perfumery Association - an organization (, {.5,«, <’. 'ic: o1“? .ut g ” that lobbies for companies involved in the :51 . .1. 1 , making. supplying. and selling of cosmetic and personal care products.
  13. 13. "We can state categorically that cosmetic products are required by strict European laws to be safe. Not to wear sun screen is an outrageous piece of advice because we know the risks of sun damage, and to suggest that not using sun protection products is a good idea is a terrible thing to do, " he said. 4
  14. 14. "We can state categorically that cosmetic products are required by strict European laws to be safe. Links and further thoughts in the description.
  15. 15. "we can state categorically that co'sm'etic products are required by strict European laws to be safe. Thanks for watching.
  16. 16. Contact us hippievsiocks hippievsiocksfitness www. outube. com/ hippievsiocksfitness , ~ ,4
  17. 17. For more information: www. youtube. com/ hippievsjocksiitness

×