Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

John Sack, HighWire, Research-Communication Studies

538 views

Published on

HighWire focused on what researchers were trying to accomplish, and how the technologies might fit in.

We first focused on workflow: how did researchers do the work of reading the literature and documenting their results?

Published in: Technology, Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

John Sack, HighWire, Research-Communication Studies

  1. 1. Research-CommunicationStudiesJohn SackMay 31, 2012
  2. 2. Studies● 2002 Web-log and Researcher Interviews ● ‘e-journal’ days ● Pre Google indexing of the literature ● Pre social media● 2010/2011 Researcher Interviews ● Has the workflow changed? ● 45 Stanford researchers● 2011/2012 Interviews ● How best to communicate research? ● 16 international biomed researchers & clinicians● 2012 Research-Communication Colloquium ● What should or will change in research communication? ● 19 students, editors, publishers, librarians, techsHighWire | Stanford University
  3. 3. The Researcher Workflow, 2002
  4. 4. Discovery Tools: Retrieval ● PubMed ● Web of Knowledge/Science ● Google Scholar ● Wikipedia ● Google “I use Google to vacuum around the edges of the carpet.”HighWire | Stanford University
  5. 5. Discovery Tools: Retrieval ● PubMed Central “has the look and feel of a government website” ● Amazon is a discovery tool for books ● Google Books “is really revolutionary” ● Books are used for “unfamiliar topics” ● Google… “…is like crushing rock. You lose the delight of discovery in grinding through stuff to find a few good articles.”HighWire | Stanford University
  6. 6. Keeping Current: Macro View● “Reading journals”, but…● Missing: thematic connections● RSS feeds, but … “…if the abstract is interesting, I’ll email the link to myself… and then I’ll never look at it.”HighWire | Stanford University
  7. 7. Keeping Current: Macro View“When I read a journal I get in the mail, it is leisure time. … …when I’m reading on my computer it is work.” HighWire | Stanford University
  8. 8. “I don’t read journals, I search databases.”HighWire | Stanford University
  9. 9. “I don’t read journals, I read articles.”HighWire | Stanford University
  10. 10. “I don’t read books, I work with them.”HighWire | Stanford University
  11. 11. “The new process is efficient, but I have lost discovery and serendipity. I can’t browse online. Because of keyword search, I see only what I’m working on right now.”HighWire | Stanford University
  12. 12. On Podcasts… “I have been interviewed for many podcasts, buthave never clicked on one.”HighWire | Stanford University
  13. 13. On Podcasts… “Audio abstracts?? I read faster than I listen” “I use my ears to listen to music, and my eyes to watch old Hollywood movies. Do you imagine I would watch Robert Weinberg telling me aboutHighWire metastases? I’d go crazy.” | Stanford University
  14. 14. Would you like videos? “Embedded Video? Gimicky.People do it because they can.” “A good movie doesn’t save bad research.”HighWire | Stanford University
  15. 15. On Social Media… “As an older researcher, I don’t use social media.” “People read blogs as entertainment, not to advance scholarship.”HighWire | Stanford University
  16. 16. On Interactivity… “Having an easy way for the reader to contact the author scares me a little.”HighWire | Stanford University
  17. 17. “Finding content is easy. Reading takes a lot of time.”HighWire | Stanford University
  18. 18. What the Users Tell Us● The workflow is the same● Researchers… ● Are conservative towards change ● Are mobile already, with laptops ● Read journals, but differently than before ● Search Google, Google Scholar, PubMed and ISI, even Amazon, not publisher sites ● Browse HTML; save, read, annotate PDFsHighWire | Stanford University
  19. 19. What the Users Tell Us: Scanning, Reading● What types of services will enhance article skimming and reading? ● Well-structured abstracts ● Author/expert commentary ● Play-in-place, less ‘pogo-sticking’ ● Chapter/article outline and navigation should be visible instantly (above the fold) ● Integration with workflow toolsHighWire | Stanford University
  20. 20. Article of the Future: What’s of Interest● Visual abstracts● Integrated supplemental information● Figure browserHighWire | Stanford University
  21. 21. The Researcher Workflow, 2002
  22. 22. The Researcher Workflow, 2011
  23. 23. 2012 Colloquium on Research Communication ● Premise: Basic format and structure of the research journal has changed little since 1665 ● Recent changes to information landscape ● Last 15 years: journals have transformed from print to online: potential is there for change ● Last 6 years: consumer explosion in interactive and social media, why not in scholarly books/journals? ● Now: What changes in approach are required to better facilitate research communication? ● Who: 19 students, editors, publishers, librarians, technologists and futurists HighWire | Stanford University
  24. 24. Topics● Filtering: 3 levels of reading: detailed, peripheral, of interest● Desire for more access to more data, coupled with better ability to filter, annotate, interact● Every paper a meeting; articles as conversations ● Paper as “just one node” in the research ecosystem, a chain/network of communication● Products that solve workflow problems HighWire | Stanford University
  25. 25. The Researcher Workflow, 2002
  26. 26. The Researcher Workflow, 2012
  27. 27. Workflow 2012: Expand the Conversation Workflow Classroom System Pre- Content Post-Publication Publication (Article, Chapter, Data Set, etc.) Society Meeting Journal Club Advertisement s, Jobs
  28. 28. John Sack

×