1. (except logo’s)
101 Innovations in Scholarly Communication
changing research workflows
Bianca Kramer & Jeroen Bosman
OpenCon webcast, December 11, 2015
@MsPhelps
@jeroenbosman

2. 2005
2010
Analysis
Outreach

3. What people can use

4. analysis
outreach
assessmentpublication
writingdiscovery

5. DIY: Encounter problem? Code the solution!

6. 2005
2010
Analysis
Outreach
Or: use
one of the
many
tools
already
out there

7. Database: scholarly communication tools
http://bit.ly/innoscholcomm-list

10. Example research workflows:
traditional to experimental

11. Open Science
y y y y yElsevier
Example research workflows:
company silos / open science

12. Three goals for science & scholarship (G-E-O)
• declaring competing interests
• replication & reproducibility
• meaningful assessment
• effective quality checks
• credit where it is due
• no fraud, plagiarism
• connected tools & platforms
• no publ. size restrictions
• null result publishing
• speed of publication
• (web)standards, IDs
• semantic discovery
• re-useability
• versioning
open peer review •
open (lab)notes •
plain language •
open drafting •
open access •
CC-0/BY •
good
efficient open
technical
changes &
standards
research
governance
changes
economic
& copyright
changes
researcher
funder
government
publisher
public
library

13. good
efficient open
Ongoing discussions
researcher
funder
publisher
public
government library

14. Charters, manifestos and declarations
2003: Berlin Declaration
2012: San Francisco DORA
2015: Leiden Manifesto
2015: The Hague Declaration
2003: Berlin Declaration
2012: San Francisco DORA
2009: Right2Research

15. A multi-cyclic, multi-ordered
model of the research workflow, with loops
preparation
analysis
writingpublication
outreach
assessment discovery
Rounds of grant writing
and application
Iterations of
search and reading
Drafting, receiving
comments,rewriting
Submit, peer review,
rejection, resubmitting
Rounds of experiments
and measurements

16. A multi-cyclic, multi-ordered
model of the research workflow, with loops
preparation
analysis
writingpublication
outreach
assessment discovery
Rounds of grant writing
and application
Iterations of
search and reading
Drafting, receiving
comments,rewriting
Submit, peer review,
rejection, resubmitting
Rounds of experiments
and measurements

17. What people do use

18. Survey: scholarly communication tools
http://101innovations.wordpress.com
Open until
February 10
2016
Over 7,000
responses

19. Survey: scholarly communication tools

20. Survey: demographics (first 6571 results)
What is your research role?What discipline are you working in?

21. Survey results: Researcher profiles
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
others
MyScienceWork
ResearcherID
Academia.edu
Profile page at own institution
ORCID
Google Scholar Citations
ResearchGate
PhD student / Postdoc / Faculty (n=3481)

22. Survey results: Altmetrics’ share

23. Do you support Open Access ?

24. Do you support Open Access ?
USA 86 %
Canada 90 %
Brazil 93 %
Russia 77 %
China 85 %
Japan 78 %
India 88 %
Australia 87 %
UK 95 %
Germany 95 %
France 92 %

25. Do you support Open Access ?
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Yes No I don't
know
Japan
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Yes No I don't
know
China

26. Do you support Open Access ?
USA 86 %
Canada 90 %
Brazil 93 %
Russia 77 %
China 85 %
Japan 78 %
India 88 %
Australia 87 %
UK 95 %
Germany 95 %
France 92 %

27. Do you support Open Science ?
USA 79 %
Canada 79 %
Brazil 88 %
Russia 86 %
China 87 %
Japan 73 %
India 94 %
Australia 82 %
UK 84 %
Germany 76 %
France 90 %

28. Make these data work for you
Do Asian postdocs look more to impact
factors to select a journal to publish in than
their Latin American counterparts?

29. Make these data work for you
Is sharing ‘preprints’ gaining traction beyond
the fields of astronomy, physics and math, and
if so, what platforms are used?

30. Make these data work for you
Which tools are used in multiple research
phases, and are they leading tools
in any of these phases?

31. Compare yourself to your peer group

32. Call to action – help distribute our survey
English
français
Español
Русский
简体中文
日本語
‫العربية‬

33. Custom URL - get data from your institution

34. What people should use ?

35. collaborative
online writing
using repositories
for institutional
visibility
more open and
post-publication
peer review

36. Importance of interoperability

39. 101innovations.wordpress.com