1. Ministry of Power Bureau of Energy
Efficiency
National Energy Conservation Awards 2009
2. BEE coordinates this voluntary
activity on behalf of Ministry of
Power
Due to consistent efforts put in
by BEE, scheme has become
very popular among industries,
as is evident from increasing
participation level
National Energy Conservation AwardsNational Energy Conservation Awards
4. 1. Excellence Award - The industrial unit eligible
for Top Rank Award for 3rd year in a row would
be given the highest prize, namely "Excellence
Award" (instead of Top Rank Award) in
recognition of its consistent performance.
2. Top Rank Award - An industrial unit
getting the First Position for the third year in
a row will be eligible for a "Top Rank
Award" for that year.
5. 3. First Prize - First prizes is
proposed to be given in each
sub-sector in the form of a gold
plated trophy, bearing plaque
with appropriate citation on such
awards
4. Second Prize - Second prizes
is proposed to be given in each
sub-sector in the form of a silver
plated trophy, bearing plaque
with appropriate citation on such
awards
5. Certificate of Merit - The third
prize will be in the form of
“Certificate of Merit”
6. The Union Power Minister, Shri Sushilkumar Shinde addressing at the
National Energy Conservation Day function, in
New Delhi on December 14, 2008
NECA 2008
7. The President, Smt. Pratibha Devisingh Patil presenting the National Energy
Conservation Awards-2007 to the General Manager, Western Railway,
Shri A.K. Jhingron at the National Energy Conservation Day function,
in New Delhi on December 14, 2007
NECA 2007
8. The Union Power Minister Shri Sushil Kumar Shinde gave away the awards on
the occasion of National Energy Conservation Day, in
New Delhi on December 14, 2006
NECA 2006
9. NECA 2005
On the occasion of NATIONAL ENERGY CONSERVATION DAY Chief Guest
Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam His Excellency President of India presented National
Energy Conservation Awards 2005 at Vigyan Bhawan,
New Delhi on 14th
December 2005
10. NECA 2004
The Prime Minister, Dr. Manmohan Singh giving away "National Energy
Conservation Awards, 2004" to one of the awardee on the occasion of
"National Energy Conservation Day", in
New Delhi on December 14, 2004
11.
12.
13.
14.
15. Evaluation & Weightage Criteria – IndustriesEvaluation & Weightage Criteria – Industries
NATIONAL ENERGY CONSERVATION AWARD - 2009
Evaluation and weightage criteria - LARGE/MEDIUM/SMALL Scale Industries
S. No. ITEM Max 50 marks
1 ENERGY SAVINGS - Electrical and Thermal
i Electrical Energy (EE) savings in 2008-09
% savings in EE over the previous year (2007-08)
(10 marks)
ii Thermal energy savings in 2008-09
% savings in Thermal Energy over the previous year ( 2007-08)
(10 marks)
2 SPECIFIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION REDUCTION
% SEC reduction during 2008-09 over 2007-08
(20 marks)
3 Specific Energy Consumption Comparisons with the best
reported values among the participating units (10 marks)
NOTE: 1. The above evaluation and weightage criteria is common for all the participating units. However for
some sectors, the application of the above criteria may not be feasible due to certain peculiar
characteristics of the concerned sectors. Therefore, Award Committee reserves the right to modify
the criteria for a particular sector, which shall be uniformly applied to all the participating units of
that sector.
2.The distribution of weightage between specific electrical and thermal energy consumption for a
particular sector would be decided by the Award Committee
3.For those particular sector, where it is not feasible to compare SEC with best reported value, 50%
of the weightage may be merged with S.No.-2 and the balance 50% with S.No.-1
16. Evaluation & Weightage Criteria – Office BuildingsEvaluation & Weightage Criteria – Office Buildings
NECA - 2009 - Evaluation & Weightage criteria - Office
Buildings
Sr. No. ITEM Max 50 marks
1 ENERGY SAVINGS - Electrical and Thermal
Electrical Energy savings in 2008-09
% Saving in EE over the previous year 2007-08 (20 marks)
2 SPECIFIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION REDUCTION
% reduction in Electric energy consumption/Total built-up
area during 2008-09 over 2007-08
(20 marks)
3
% reduction in Total energy/ Total built-up area
comparison with the best reported values among the
participating units
(10 marks)
Note: The above evaluation and weightage criteria is common for all the Office
Buildings. If due to some peculiar characteristics of the participating sectors,
the application of the above criteria may not be feasible.Therefore, Award
Committee reserves the right to modify the criteria, which shall be uniformly
applied to all the participating Office Buildings.
17. Evaluation & Weightage Criteria – Hotels & Hospitals BuildingEvaluation & Weightage Criteria – Hotels & Hospitals Building
NECA - 2009 - Evaluation & Weightage criteria - Hotels and Hospital Buildings
S. No. ITEM Max 50 marks
1 ENERGY SAVINGS - Electrical and Thermal (10 marks)
i Electrical Energy (EE) savings in 2008-09
% Saving in EE over the previous year 2007-08
ii Thermal energy savings in 2008-09 (10 marks)
% Saving in Thermal Energy over the previous year 2007-08
2 SPECIFIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION REDUCTION
i % reduction in Electric energy consumption/Total built-up area during
2008-09 over 2007-08
(10 marks)
ii % reduction in Thermal energy consumption/Total built-up area during
2008-09 over 2007-08
(10 marks)
3 % reduction in Total energy/built-up area comparison with the best
reported values among the participating units
(10 marks)
NOTE: 1. The above evaluation and weightage criteria is common for all the Hotels and Hospitals buildings. If due
to some peculiar characteristics of the participating sectors, the application of the above criteria may not
be feasible.Therefore, Award Committee reserves the right to modify the criteria, which shall be
uniformly applied to all the participating buildings in that particular sector.
2.The distribution of weightage between specific electrical and thermal energy consumption for a
particular sector would be decided by the Award Committee
3.For those particular sector, where it is not feasible to compare SEC with best reported value, 50% of the
weightage may be merged with S.No.-2 and the balance 50% with S.No.-1
18. Evaluation & Weightage Criteria – Shopping MallEvaluation & Weightage Criteria – Shopping Mall
NECA - 2009 - Evaluation & Weightage criteria - Shopping Mall
Buildings
Sr. No. ITEM Max 50 marks
1 ENERGY SAVINGS - Electrical and Thermal
Electrical Energy savings in lakh kWh for 2008-09
% Saving in EE over the previous year 2007-08 (20 marks)
2 SPECIFIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION REDUCTION
% reduction in Electric energy consumption/Total built-up area during
2008-09 over 2007-08
(20 marks)
3
% reduction in Total energy/Total built-up area comparison with the best
reported values among the participating units
(10 marks)
Note:
The above evaluation and weightage criteria is common for all the Shooping Malls. If due to
some peculiar characteristics of the participating sectors, the application of the above criteria
may not be feasible.Therefore, Award Committee reserves the right to modify the criteria,
which shall be uniformly applied to all the participating shopping malls.
19. Evaluation & Weightage Criteria – MunicipalityEvaluation & Weightage Criteria – Municipality
Evaluation criteria -MUNICIPALITY
S. No. ITEM Max 50 marks
1 ENERGY SAVINGS
i Electrical Energy savings in lakh kWh for 2008-09
% savings in EE over the previous year (2007-08)
(10 marks)
2 SPECIFIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION REDUCTION
i
Specific Electrical Energy Consumption in street lighting (kWh/km street
lighted)
% SEC reduction during 2008-09 over 2007-08
(10 marks)
ii
Specific Electrical Energy Consumption in drinking water pumping
(kWh/million m3
/ km)
% SEC reduction during 2008-09 over 2007-08
(10 marks)
iii
Specific Electrical Energy Consumption in sewage pumping
(kWh/million m3
/ km)
% SEC reduction during 2008-09 over 2007-08
(10 marks)
3 Specific Energy Consumption Comparisons with the best reported
values among the participating units (10 marks)
NOTE: The above evaluation and weightage criteria is common for all the municipalities. If due to some peculiar
characteristics of the participating sectors, the application of the above criteria may not be
feasible.Therefore, Award Committee reserves the right to modify the criteria, which shall be uniformly
applied to all the municipalities.