Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Online information 2010_european_theater_final


Published on

Online information London ADBS 2010

Published in: Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Online information 2010_european_theater_final

  1. 1. Life Science 2.0: Market & Medias <ul><li>MEDIAS </li></ul><ul><li>Scientists are ” Leaders of the Web 2.0 pack ” </li></ul><ul><li>Social applications will have a major influence on the future of research </li></ul><ul><li>33% of scientists are now using blogs </li></ul>
  2. 2. Science 2.0: a success, really? <ul><li>Facts: Basis=10 millions of Scientists WW </li></ul><ul><ul><li>SN: BioMedExperts : 300,000 (less than 1% of FaceBook) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Blogs: only 20,000 are « Science » (0.01% of blogs WW) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Twitter: estimation of 600 Scientwists (6 millions) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>What Scientists say: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>when you (…) speak with the majority of scientists , you find out that they don’t have much interest in using many of these new technologies  » D. Crotty </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Noone actually reads the scientific content on a blog </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The vast majority of scientists are not yet hooked up on these networks </li></ul></ul>
  3. 3. Why Science 2.O is failing? <ul><li>A confused market </li></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Too much tools for a same purpose: where is the killer application? </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>Are not appropriate to the Science Culture </li></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Peer-reviewed journals and Congress are still the models </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>Scientists do not need web 2.0 </li></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>90% are satisfied with their information workflow </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>They have more information than they can absorb and keep up with </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Web 2.0 does not bring qualitative information </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>As a result, very low adoption </li></ul>
  4. 4. What about Science Librarians?! <ul><li>Which attitude? </li></ul><ul><ul><li>« the challenge for libraries is to find ways to embrace social networks sites and technologies without killing their potential » D. Stuart, Research Information, 2010 </li></ul></ul><ul><li>New role of the Info Scientist: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>The Info consultant </li></ul></ul>
  5. 5. Choose the right train (where your users are) Students Confirmed scientists USA Europe Public institutions Companies Junior scientists