Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

Environmental and Social Impacts of Hydro-Electric Dams in Chamba District of Himachal Pradesh

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Loading in …3
×

Check these out next

1 of 22 Ad

Environmental and Social Impacts of Hydro-Electric Dams in Chamba District of Himachal Pradesh

Having 4300 large dams already constructed and many more in pipeline, India is one of world's most prolific dam-builders. Large dams in India are estimated to have submerged about 37500 km2 land area and displaced tens of millions of people. Himachal Pradesh is proceeding towards power-surplus state and there are as many as 401 projects of different magnitude in different stages of installation on 5 river basins of the state i.e. Satluj, Beas, Ravi, Chenab and Yamuna. State has identified its hydropower generation potential at 23,000 MW. The ecological devastation caused by various projects at lower altitudes of Himachal Pradesh has been alarming; while the prospect of what will happen to the fragile alpine ecosystem is frightening. These projects will change the microclimate that will result in accelerated melting of the snow and glaciers at high altitudes. Like other river basins of the state, hydro-electric power generation in Chamba district was started in 1980s, with 117 mini & micro power projects in different stages of execution at present. Having the special focus on Hul projects the present paper explores the impacts of various dams on environment and local people in Chamba district of Himachal Pradesh. About 6000 local people are being affected by Hul-I project only. The consequences to nature and wildlife will also prove disastrous. As of now, the wildlife such as deer, bear, goat, tiger and peacock do not enter the fields of farmers. Deforestation and soil erosion are even more devastating. Making the situation even more absurd is that the benefits of these power plants do not go to the community suffering the consequences. Gujjar and Gaddi tribes in the state of Himachal Pradesh have been agitating against 4.5 MW hydropower plant from diverting the entire flow of the Hul stream, on which their lives depend. These communities have for more than two decades protected and preserved the forests from which Hul stream originates. The project’s pipeline is said to destroy about 2000 of slow-growing oak trees. Livelihood and social impacts of poorly planned mini-hydel projects can be thus devastating, as exemplified in this case.

Having 4300 large dams already constructed and many more in pipeline, India is one of world's most prolific dam-builders. Large dams in India are estimated to have submerged about 37500 km2 land area and displaced tens of millions of people. Himachal Pradesh is proceeding towards power-surplus state and there are as many as 401 projects of different magnitude in different stages of installation on 5 river basins of the state i.e. Satluj, Beas, Ravi, Chenab and Yamuna. State has identified its hydropower generation potential at 23,000 MW. The ecological devastation caused by various projects at lower altitudes of Himachal Pradesh has been alarming; while the prospect of what will happen to the fragile alpine ecosystem is frightening. These projects will change the microclimate that will result in accelerated melting of the snow and glaciers at high altitudes. Like other river basins of the state, hydro-electric power generation in Chamba district was started in 1980s, with 117 mini & micro power projects in different stages of execution at present. Having the special focus on Hul projects the present paper explores the impacts of various dams on environment and local people in Chamba district of Himachal Pradesh. About 6000 local people are being affected by Hul-I project only. The consequences to nature and wildlife will also prove disastrous. As of now, the wildlife such as deer, bear, goat, tiger and peacock do not enter the fields of farmers. Deforestation and soil erosion are even more devastating. Making the situation even more absurd is that the benefits of these power plants do not go to the community suffering the consequences. Gujjar and Gaddi tribes in the state of Himachal Pradesh have been agitating against 4.5 MW hydropower plant from diverting the entire flow of the Hul stream, on which their lives depend. These communities have for more than two decades protected and preserved the forests from which Hul stream originates. The project’s pipeline is said to destroy about 2000 of slow-growing oak trees. Livelihood and social impacts of poorly planned mini-hydel projects can be thus devastating, as exemplified in this case.

Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Slideshows for you (20)

Viewers also liked (20)

Advertisement

Similar to Environmental and Social Impacts of Hydro-Electric Dams in Chamba District of Himachal Pradesh (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Advertisement

Environmental and Social Impacts of Hydro-Electric Dams in Chamba District of Himachal Pradesh

  1. 1. National Conference on Geography of Change Environmental and Social Impacts of Hydro-Electric Dams in Chamba District of Himachal Pradesh By: Banjar – 175123 District Kullu Himachal Pradesh (India) Hasrat Arjjumend Tel: 01903-200202, 200201, Senior Fellow 09418133427, 09910188948 Fax: +91-01903-222257 E-mail: info@grassrootsinstitute.in Website: www.grassrootsinstitute.in 1
  2. 2. Big Dams of India: Tehri Dam on Bhagirathi River, Tehri in Uttarakhand Environmental and Social Impacts of Hydro-Electric Dams | By H. Arjjumend | Grassroots Institute
  3. 3. Big Dams of India: Bhakra Dam on Sutlej River, Punjab/Himachal Pradesh Environmental and Social Impacts of Hydro-Electric Dams | By H. Arjjumend | Grassroots Institute
  4. 4. Big Dams of India: Idukki Dam on Periyar River, Kerala Environmental and Social Impacts of Hydro-Electric Dams | By H. Arjjumend | Grassroots Institute
  5. 5. Introduction:  In 1947, there were 300 dams  In 2000, figure roses to 4000  Today, there are 4300 dams  After 1980s, the controversies erupted on issues of large dams  Large dams in India are estimated to have submerged about 37500 km2 land area  About 10 million people displaced or affected  Adverse impacts of dams have spawned resistance movements Environmental and Social Impacts of Hydro-Electric Dams | By H. Arjjumend | Grassroots Institute
  6. 6. Methodology:  Study Area:  Chamba district, bordered by Pathankot, Ladakh (J&K), Lahaul & Bara Banghal, Kangra (HP), and Gurdaspur (Punjab)  Average elevation - 1,006 m (3,301 ft)  Longitude - 76°12’06” E to 76°14’52” E  Latitude - 32°44’14” N to 32°45’43” N  Chamba district lies among 55 most backward districts of India  Paper based on exploratory study Environmental and Social Impacts of Hydro-Electric Dams | By H. Arjjumend | Grassroots Institute
  7. 7. Methodology:  Research Methods:  Participant Observation  Questionnaire to collect data and record the perception of the affected local people  Jadera and Sillagraht Panchyat of Chamba were sampled for interviewing 35 respondents from each gram panchayat.  Interviews of some key respondents belonging to resistance movement  Review of several recent publications Environmental and Social Impacts of Hydro-Electric Dams | By H. Arjjumend | Grassroots Institute
  8. 8. Dams in Himachal Pradesh:  Himachal Pradesh - 3 main mountain ranges: 1. Dhauladhar, 2. Pir Panjal, 3. Great Himalayan  Hydropower generation potential - 23,000 MW (present 7000 )  401 projects are in different stages of installation on 5 river basins i.e. Satluj, Beas, Ravi, Chenab & Yamuna  Rivers and streams are being diverted from one valley into another, with serious impacts. E.g. 800 MW Parbati-II Project (Kullu), Kashang projects at 3,000 m (10,000 feet) Projects close to China border  From origin of Satluj river (Lake Rakshastal in China) to Kinnaur district (7 km stretch), water runs from one tunnel to another tunnel (run-of-river projects) Environmental and Social Impacts of Hydro-Electric Dams | By H. Arjjumend | Grassroots Institute
  9. 9. Dams in Chamba District:  NHPC dam was first project in 1980  3 major power projects: Chimera-1, Chimera-2, Chimera-3, Chimera-3 in Ravi basin  117 mini/micro project: MOU for 22 signed; IA for 42 signed  Hul-I is micro-hydroelectric project to produce 3.8 MW on Hul Nala, a tributary of Ravi river in Saal Valley. But actually is of 5 MW, which created debates on micro- classification.  Contractor: M/s Hul Hydro Power, subsidiary of Astha Projects (India) Ltd., Hyderbad Environmental and Social Impacts of Hydro-Electric Dams | By H. Arjjumend | Grassroots Institute
  10. 10. Environmental Impacts of Hul-I Project:  On 28 km length of Saal River 7 mini & micro hydel projects are proposed  Dams are said to adversely impact the ecology, geology, socio- economics and culture  Hul-I will disturb approx. 5 km or ¼th of catchment of stream  Oak forest managed by agro-pastoralist Gujjars & Gaddis  Livestock based local economy of pastoralists will be affected severely  As against official figure of 243, about 2000 trees will be cut down Environmental and Social Impacts of Hydro-Electric Dams | By H. Arjjumend | Grassroots Institute
  11. 11. Environmental Impacts of Hul-I Project:  Once the construction commences, the resulting disturbance will influence the wild animals to venture into crop fields causing damages  Most damaging effect is the diversion of water, impacting seriously the livelihoods of upstream villages  People of Saal Valley are dependent on Hul Nala for drinking water, irrigation, fishery & water mills (gharats)  Drinking & irrigation water schemes serving 10 gram panchayats will be affected Environmental and Social Impacts of Hydro-Electric Dams | By H. Arjjumend | Grassroots Institute
  12. 12. Environmental Impacts of Hul-I Project:  Discharge of sources of drinking water supply schemes to villages of Sillagharat, Jadera, Paluhien, Sungal and Kaila Panchayats has already been reduced  Lift Irrigation and Pipeline Scheme to serve from Silla Khud to Koni-ki-Behi gram panchayats will become redundant  With changing climates, water sources are fast drying up. Saal River is only regular water source for villages of 8 gram panchyats and Chamba town.  Hul-I project can kill Hul stream and put present & future uses of water in jeopardy. Environmental and Social Impacts of Hydro-Electric Dams | By H. Arjjumend | Grassroots Institute
  13. 13. Socio-Economic Impacts of Hul-I Project:  6000 people to be affected by Hul-I  1000 people of Jadera and Sillagraht panchyats only  Gujjar and Gaddi nomadic pastoralists are main inhabitants  Livelihood and social impacts would be devastating  50 families have fishing licence on Hul stream; about same number fish with no license  Around 41 water mills will be forced to close down; 1 water mill supports livelihood of 5 families  500 households will pay double for grinding of flour Environmental and Social Impacts of Hydro-Electric Dams | By H. Arjjumend | Grassroots Institute
  14. 14. Socio-Economic Impacts of Hul-I Project:  Benefits of these power plants will not be going to the community suffering the consequences Power will be sold to private companies and distributed all over India for an incredible profit  Project proponents are paying a small amount as one time compensation, but which is no answer to sustained regular income over the years Environmental and Social Impacts of Hydro-Electric Dams | By H. Arjjumend | Grassroots Institute
  15. 15. People’s Resistance against Hul-I Project:  Saal Ghaati Bachao Sangharsh Morcha & Himalaya Niti Abhiyan opposing the Hul-I & II projects since 2003  Opposition is due to adverse impacts on forests, irrigation, local livelihoods, drinking water supply schemes and environment.  Jadera Gram Panhcayat has set forth 4 resolutions to the Central Government denying continuation of Hul-I & II projects. Environmental and Social Impacts of Hydro-Electric Dams | By H. Arjjumend | Grassroots Institute
  16. 16. People’s Resistance against Hul-I Project:  Gujjar and Gaddi tribes agitating against Hul-I from diverting the entire flow of Hul stream on which their lives depend.  Series of activities demonstrating people’s resistance and struggle against the dam construction are illustrated chronologically in Annexure-C of paper [16.11.1996 to 04.10.2012]. Environmental and Social Impacts of Hydro-Electric Dams | By H. Arjjumend | Grassroots Institute
  17. 17. Conclusion:  Large-scale negative impacts of dams and inequitable distribution of risks have caused the mobilization and resistance of affected people in the country especially after 1980  Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) of Central Government appears not to minimize the environmental & livelihood impacts of even mini & micro hydel projects in fragile mountain ecosystems. Environmental and Social Impacts of Hydro-Electric Dams | By H. Arjjumend | Grassroots Institute
  18. 18. Conclusion:  Micro hydel projects do not seem de facto micro because of their adverse effects on ecosystems and local inhabitants  Despite perpetual resistance of nomadic pastoralists led by Saal Ghati Bachao Sangharsh Morcha and Himalaya Niti Abhiyan the state government is adamant to continue the Hul-I Project in Chamba district. Environmental and Social Impacts of Hydro-Electric Dams | By H. Arjjumend | Grassroots Institute
  19. 19. Conclusion:  People’s rights to water use must be recognized and respected on priority basis.  State should also review Micro-Hydro-Project Policy giving impetus to the impacts on people’s livelihoods, environment, rangelands, irrigation, drinking water and other local/traditional uses of water. Environmental and Social Impacts of Hydro-Electric Dams | By H. Arjjumend | Grassroots Institute
  20. 20. Thank you very much We appeal for collaborations Environmental and Social Impacts of Hydro-Electric Dams | By H. Arjjumend | Grassroots Institute
  21. 21. 21
  22. 22. info@grassrootsinstitute.in director@grassrootsinstitute.in www.grassrootsinstitute.in www.grassroots.org.in 22

×