Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Paul Marshall   PD Lead Consultant        Region 5paul.marshall@dpi.nc.gov       EVAAS PD Region 5 September 19th  Region ...
SBE Policy on Standard 6• The Department of Public Instruction will  complete the sixth and eighth standard  ratings after...
What We Have                   Some AssessmentsEvaluation Tools                        From the MET…                   to ...
Observation + Other Measures • Standard 6 and 8What do we need?  We need a state-adopted growth model  and a fair 6 & 8 ra...
Standards 6 & 8 – The BasicsTeachers       1 2 3 4 5 6Demonstrate   Establish Leadership Environment                      ...
Growth ModelTeachers      6   Contribute   Standard 6 and 8 to Academic     Success     are measures ofPrincipals         ...
Proficiency vs Growth           Scenario                Proficient   Growth5th grader begins the yearreading at a 1st grad...
Growth ModelTeachers                           We will use      6   Contribute to Academic     Success                Educ...
Growth ModelTeachers                How do Value-Added models work?      6   Contribute to Academic     Success           ...
RatingsTeachers      6   Contribute to Academic     Success                How will the ratings onPrincipals      Standard...
Principal Rating CategoriesPrincipals   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Strategic Instructional CulturalLeadership Leadership Leadership    ...
Teacher Ratings CategoriesTeachers     1 2 3 4 5                                                       6Demonstrate     Es...
RatingsTeachers     1 2 3 4 5                                                         6Demonstrate     Establish       Kno...
Teacher Ratings in 2011-12Rationale - MET Research - Standard 6 & 8 - Status - Support                                  ▲ ...
Teacher Ratings in 2011-12                      6 Yearly Rating              Teacher-level EVAAS reports available on •Doe...
Teacher Ratings in 2012-132012 – 2013 is the first year of data for all teachers andschool administrators who have their o...
Principal Ratings• Standards 8 rating will be determined using  school-wide EVAAS growth                                  ...
Ratings     Teachers           1 2 3 4 5 6                   Demonstrate                    Leadership                    ...
Effectiveness Status                       Using multiple                       measures to gauge                       ov...
Status     What is the difference     between Ratings and     Status?                              09/23/12 • page 20
Status         Ratings                         Status•   Teachers                     • A single overall status that    6 ...
Status and Standard 6 & 8  • An educator receives an    effectiveness status only once they    have 3 years of data on    ...
3-Year Rolling AverageRating from    Rating from   Rating from2012 - 2013    2013 - 2014   2014 - 2015                    ...
Three Years of DataAny three years of data attributable to a teacher orprincipal will be combined and used:         •Any g...
Status   So once a educator has a   three-year average rating   for Standard 6 or 8, how   is status determined?          ...
Status• The Three Status Categories are     1. In Need of Improvement     2. Effective     3. Highly Effective            ...
Teacher Status                                                                 In Need of                    Highly       ...
Principal Status                                                                                                       In ...
What Will Teachers See? • Ratings on Standards 1 – 5 of the Educator   Evaluation System (as recorded in online tool) • St...
Detail onthe SixthStandardRating
Jody Cleven jody.cleven@dpi.nc.gov      Paul Marshallpaul.marshall@dpi.nc.gov         Region 5   PD Lead Consultants
What questionsdo you have??
Standard 6 & 8
Standard 6 & 8
Standard 6 & 8
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Standard 6 & 8

963 views

Published on

Published in: Business, Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Standard 6 & 8

  1. 1. Paul Marshall PD Lead Consultant Region 5paul.marshall@dpi.nc.gov EVAAS PD Region 5 September 19th Region 7 October 10th
  2. 2. SBE Policy on Standard 6• The Department of Public Instruction will complete the sixth and eighth standard ratings after the results of the 2011 – 2012 testing program have been finalized and approved by the State Board of Education, and the EVAAS value-added scores have been calculated. This population should take place in late September 2012.
  3. 3. What We Have Some AssessmentsEvaluation Tools From the MET… to Measure Growth End of Grade End of Course Observation  VoCATs Tools Standards 1-7 Standard 8 Assessments to  Measure End of Grade Growth End of Course VoCATs  Student Survey Standards 1-5 Standard 6 Exploring Pilot in 47 LEAs in 2011-12
  4. 4. Observation + Other Measures • Standard 6 and 8What do we need? We need a state-adopted growth model and a fair 6 & 8 rating strategy • Status We need an overall method to determine educator effectiveness status • Measures of Student Learning (MSLs) For those grades and subjects that are currently non- tested, we need ways to measure growth 09/23/12 • page 4
  5. 5. Standards 6 & 8 – The BasicsTeachers 1 2 3 4 5 6Demonstrate Establish Leadership Environment Know Content Facilitate Learning Reflect on Contribute Practice to Academic SuccessPrincipals (and other Administrators) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Strategic Instructional Cultural Human Managerial External Micro- Academic Leadership Leadership Leadership Resource Leadership Development political Achievement Leadership Leadership Leadership Leadership 09/23/12 • page 5
  6. 6. Growth ModelTeachers 6 Contribute Standard 6 and 8 to Academic Success are measures ofPrincipals Growth 8 Academic Academic Achievement Achievement Leadership Leadership 09/23/12 • page 6
  7. 7. Proficiency vs Growth Scenario Proficient Growth5th grader begins the yearreading at a 1st grade level. NO YESEnds the year reading at a 4thgrade level.5th grader begins the yearreading at a 7th grade level.Ends the year reading at the 7th YES NOgrade level.
  8. 8. Growth ModelTeachers We will use 6 Contribute to Academic Success Educator Value-AddedPrincipals Assessment System EVAAS 8 Academic Academic Achievement Achievement Leadership for standards 6 & 8 when possible Leadership 09/23/12 • page 8
  9. 9. Growth ModelTeachers How do Value-Added models work? 6 Contribute to Academic Success •They measure growth by predicting how well a student will do on an assessment. How do they predict how wellPrincipals the student will do? •They look at previous test scores and estimate how well 8 Academic Academic Achievement the student should do at the end of the year. Achievement Leadership Every student must grow based on where they start. Leadership 09/23/12 • page 9
  10. 10. RatingsTeachers 6 Contribute to Academic Success How will the ratings onPrincipals Standards 6 & 8 work? 8 Academic Academic Achievement Achievement Leadership Leadership 09/23/12 • page 10
  11. 11. Principal Rating CategoriesPrincipals 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Strategic Instructional CulturalLeadership Leadership Leadership Human Resource Leadership Managerial External Leadership Development Micro- political Leadership Leadership 8 Academic Achievement Leadership 5 Rating Categories 3 Rating Categories Not Demonstrated Does Not Meet Expected Growth Developing Meets Expected Growth Proficient Exceeds Expected Growth Accomplished Distinguished 09/23/12 • page 11
  12. 12. Teacher Ratings CategoriesTeachers 1 2 3 4 5 6Demonstrate Establish Know Facilitate Reflect on Contribute Leadership Environment Content Learning Practice to Academic Success 5 Rating Categories 3 Rating Categories Not Demonstrated Does Not Meet Expected Growth Developing Meets Expected Growth Proficient Exceeds Expected Growth Accomplished Distinguished 09/23/12 • page 12
  13. 13. RatingsTeachers 1 2 3 4 5 6Demonstrate Establish Know Facilitate Reflect on Contribute Leadership Environment Content Learning Practice to Academic Success 5 Rating Categories 3 Ratings Categories Why the difference? Identifying only three rating categories on standard 6 & 8 improves certainty of categorization.
  14. 14. Teacher Ratings in 2011-12Rationale - MET Research - Standard 6 & 8 - Status - Support ▲ 6 School- Yearly Rating Teacher •Does not Meet EVAAS Growth wide Expected Growth EVAAS Growth •Meets Expected Growth 70% 30% •Exceeds Expected Growth Weighted Average Why is school-wide EVAAS growth included? • To encourage collaboration and collective ownership of overall outcomes. Note: In 2011-12, teachers without individual EVAAS growth will have school-wide growth for Standard 6.
  15. 15. Teacher Ratings in 2011-12 6 Yearly Rating Teacher-level EVAAS reports available on •Does not Meet September 11 (estimated) Expected Growth •Meets Expected Growth Teacher sixth standard ratings available •Exceeds Expected Growth at end of SeptemberSixth standard ratings available in two locations:1.Rating only will be back-populated into the McRELtool and available to see on the 2011 – 2012 summaryrating forms2.Rating and component data available in EVAAS
  16. 16. Teacher Ratings in 2012-132012 – 2013 is the first year of data for all teachers andschool administrators who have their own data Possible additional 6 element Yearly Rating School- Student Teacher •Does not EVAAS wide Surveys Expected Growth Growth EVAAS •Meets Expected Growth (?) Growth •Exceeds Expected Growth Weighted Average 09/23/12 • page 16
  17. 17. Principal Ratings• Standards 8 rating will be determined using school-wide EVAAS growth 8 Yearly Rating School-wide •Does not Meet EVAAS Expectations Growth •Meets Expected Growth •Exceeds Expected Growth 09/23/12 • page 17
  18. 18. Ratings Teachers 1 2 3 4 5 6 Demonstrate Leadership Establish Environment Know Content Facilitate Learning Reflect on Practice Contribute to Academic Success Principals 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Strategic Instructional Cultural Human Managerial External Micro- Academic Leadership Leadership Leadership Resource Leadership Development political Achievement Leadership Leadership Leadership LeadershipKey Note on Ratings•Every educator is evaluated every year•Each standard and rating stands on its own(1 out of 6, not 1/6)•Ratings are used to create professional development plans each year•Ratings are used to determine status
  19. 19. Effectiveness Status Using multiple measures to gauge overall effectiveness of educators
  20. 20. Status What is the difference between Ratings and Status? 09/23/12 • page 20
  21. 21. Status Ratings Status• Teachers • A single overall status that 6 separate ratings to help is determined once a teachers grow each year principal or teacher has three years of growth• Principals data to populate 6 or 8 8 separate ratings to help principals grow each year • Categories for Status 1. In Need of Improvement 2. Effective 3. Highly Effective 09/23/12 • page 21
  22. 22. Status and Standard 6 & 8 • An educator receives an effectiveness status only once they have 3 years of data on Standard 6 or 8 • A 3-year rolling average of growth data from standard 6 or 8 is used as part of determining overall status 09/23/12 • page 22
  23. 23. 3-Year Rolling AverageRating from Rating from Rating from2012 - 2013 2013 - 2014 2014 - 2015 1.9 + -2.5 + 1.2Standard Standard Standard 6 6 6 3 Contribute to Academic Success = .21.9 -2.5 1.2 Met Expected GrowthMet Did not Met 3- year average rating onExpected meet Expected standard 6 forGrowth Expected Growth determining statusNote: A similar methodology applies to principals as well. GrowthNote: The values above represent values from the MRM model in EVAAS. 09/23/12 • page 23
  24. 24. Three Years of DataAny three years of data attributable to a teacher orprincipal will be combined and used: •Any grades •Any subjects •Any schools •Any districtsThe three years of data do not start until they arespecific to that teacher and his or her students 09/23/12 • page 24
  25. 25. Status So once a educator has a three-year average rating for Standard 6 or 8, how is status determined? 09/23/12 • page 25
  26. 26. Status• The Three Status Categories are 1. In Need of Improvement 2. Effective 3. Highly Effective 09/23/12 • page 26
  27. 27. Teacher Status In Need of Highly Effective Improvement Effective Standards 1-5 Any rating Proficient Accomplis In the year lower than or Higher hed on Standards 1 2 3 4 5Demonstrate Establish Leadership Environment Know Content Facilitate Learning Reflect on Practice proficient 1-5 or Higher on And/Or And Standards And 1-5 Standard 6 Does Not Meets or Exceeds Three-year rolling average Meet Exceeds Expected Expected Expected Growth )/ 3 ) 6 2 years ago 6 + 1 ago + year 6 This Growth Growth year
  28. 28. Principal Status In Need of Highly Effective Improvement Effective Standards 1-7 Any rating Proficient Accomplis In the year lower than or Higher hed on Standards 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 StrategicLeadership Instructional Leadership Cultural Leadership Human Resource Leadership Managerial Leadership External Development Leadership Micro- political Leadership proficient 1-7 or Higher on And/Or And Standards And 1-7 Standard 8 Does Not Meets or ExceedsThree-year rolling average Meet Exceeds Expected /3 Expected Expected Growth ) 8) year This 8 + 1 ago + year 8 ago 2 years Growth Growth
  29. 29. What Will Teachers See? • Ratings on Standards 1 – 5 of the Educator Evaluation System (as recorded in online tool) • Standard 6 rating (current year and 2 prior years) • Three-year rolling average of student growth values and accompanying Standard 6 rating (for Status determination) • Overall Effectiveness Status 09/23/12 • page 29
  30. 30. Detail onthe SixthStandardRating
  31. 31. Jody Cleven jody.cleven@dpi.nc.gov Paul Marshallpaul.marshall@dpi.nc.gov Region 5 PD Lead Consultants
  32. 32. What questionsdo you have??

×