What went wrong

594 views

Published on

A government 2.0 project in Italy takes off well, but then faces trouble as bureacracy and online community collide. Presentation given at the SIX Spring School in Amsterdam in May 2011. Relates to the blog post: http://goo.gl/vp25D

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
594
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
146
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
5
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

What went wrong

  1. 1. Kublai Camp 2009 Kublai Camp 2011 administrative uncertainty starts WHAT WENT WRONG? The rise and fall of an open government project – Alberto Cottica, May 2011
  2. 2. € 115 bn
  3. 3. Impact = LOW
  4. 4. Transformative potential
  5. 5. !!!Increased project serendipity
  6. 6. Project development in a network
  7. 7. Second Life for brainstorming
  8. 8. ValuesSoftwareOutreach
  9. 9. 2500 400 users projects
  10. 10. Kublai Camp 2009 Kublai Camp 2011 administrative uncertainty starts But then...
  11. 11. So, what was the matter?•uncertain planning horizon•full transparency technically difficult•rising costs (and overheads)•sluggish, uncertain decisions•impassable barriers between paid staff and community•no budget for impact assessment
  12. 12. What would you do?
  13. 13. Legal stuffThis work is licensed under the CreativeCommons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copyof this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ or send a letter toCreative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.All photos licensed CC on Flickr.com. Authors (top to bottom):unknown author, CriticalCity, Alberto Cottica, Alberto Cottica,Massimo Faccioli Pintozzi, Ballacoicinghiali

×