Be the first to like this
There are many master programmes for project management (PM) offered for students in many schools around the world. One major problem arises for PM theorists when some young professional are there among these students. They keep interrupting the teachers during the lectures trying to tell that what happens in reality is different from the theories discussed. They know about the real organizations and you cannot tell them anything that does not match the reality. Hobbs (2007) discussed one aspect of projects that has real lack of consensus on practice, which is the idea of project management office (PMO). That makes it even more difficult for trainers to discuss, especially in the presence of professional trainees. Hobbs (2007) discussed several different names and forms of PMOs that fit different purposes and bring up different benefits and even disadvantages. That calls into question if adopting or copying PMO styles to be integrated in a project-oriented organization would really add a significant value. For further discussion, this article is dedicated to discuss how PMOs can be a good asset for project-oriented organizations.