Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Library Committee Meeting


Published on

Published in: Education, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Library Committee Meeting

  2. 2. Agenda Book checkout system  Book Ordering  Digitization  Digital Library  Library Arrangement 
  3. 3. Little Things The water library no longer carries Lake Line  as of mid-2007. Do we want to begin to hold that periodical?
  4. 4. Book Checkout System There are 3273 books in the checkout system.  About 330 have been checked out in the last 3  years. No weeding decisions will need to be made for  several years The highest value of the system is for locating  books once they are checked out. So we are barcoding theses to help locate them when necessary.
  5. 5. Book Checkout System Most items have been checked out only 1  time. The most popular items are (exploded pieces in the graph):  Limnology: inland water ecosystems  Fishes of Wisconsin  Stream ecology: structure and function of running waters  Limnology: lake and river ecosystems  Louis Agassiz: a life in science  Number of Times Ecology and classification of North American freshwater invertebrates Checked out  An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America 10  8 Through the looking glass: a field guide to aquatic plants  7 Fisheries techniques  5 4 3 2 1
  6. 6. Center usage of checkout system There has been a drop off in the system  usage. This is likely due to the fact that some CFL members are not added to the system. 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
  7. 7. Checkout System: Thoughts? Anything that can be improved. Is there any  other information you’d like.
  8. 8. Book Purchasing Current proposed books add up to $757  We have been allotted $1000  We have an extra $243. Plus we should have  a back up or two in case one cannot ship in time.
  9. 9. Digitization We’ve finished digitizing the first round of  archives A-L Currently 25% of our reprint collection is  digitized. 75% of our faculty-authored reprints are  digitized Aim is for 100% of CFL related publications to  be digitized.  Problem: No comprehensive list of all individuals (including LTER and students) who might have published.
  10. 10. Digital Library: Why Our digitized collection is difficult to access  and pretty confusing Our collection does not allow us to share  publications with those outside the CFL, or even those associated with the CFL, but off the network We lack the ability to share with other people  and institutions CFL publications and research
  11. 11. Digital Library: Why Freely available  science correlates to higher citation impact (and hence more readers) in Increase in citation of free journals poorer countries From Science 2/20/09 “Open Access  and Global Participation in Science” James A. Evans1* and Jacob Reimer2”
  12. 12. Digital Library: Key components Access: CFL members should be able to  access everything Authentication: Those outside CFL should be  able to access some items, but only what we allow them to access Usability: Navigation and search should be  powerful and intuitive or else it will not be used Adaptability: Should be able to be updated and  modified easily
  13. 13. Digital Library Two test libraries have been set up using  content management systems These systems, Drupal and Joomla, are both  free and open source and supported by a broad community of users
  14. 14. Digital Library: Joomla http://joomlalib.uwcfl  .org/ (then click library) Nice looking, easy  to maintain This would best be  served by categorizing by author
  15. 15. Digital Library: Joomla Weak search  interface Best for browsing or  searching for specific title
  16. 16. Digital Library: Joomla Metadata is  weak, just pasted in Items such as date  are altered
  17. 17. Digital Library: Drupal  up/ Bibliographic  software like we have now This is a much  stronger but much more complex system Interface not as nice  Much more  extensible (to a
  18. 18. Digital Library: Drupal Search interface is  more powerful Still not as good as  Endnote Biblio has “filters”  but these can be overwhelmed by number of authors
  19. 19. Digital Library: Drupal The display page  contains much more information Transferring  information is easy
  20. 20. Digital Library: Drupal Drupal lists all  publications Other users can see  a hyperlink (if allowed) or can request a copy of the article Authenticated users  are given a download link
  21. 21. Digital Library: Thoughts What’s necessary, what’s not, what would we  like in the future (photos, gov. docs, etc.)
  22. 22. Library Floor Plan At last year’s library seminar there was an  interest in adding furniture to the library A grant for furniture will be submitted to UW  friends of the library if we decide to go this route.
  23. 23. Library Floor Plan: Proposed Revisions