Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

The Use of Evidence in Electronic Portfolios: A Typology


Published on

A presentation given with Lesley Smith at Praxis, Pedagogy, People: Writing in the DC Metropolitan Area, January 9, 2009 in Washington, DC.

Published in: Education, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

The Use of Evidence in Electronic Portfolios: A Typology

  1. 1. The Use of Evidence in Electronic Portfolios: A Typology Praxis, Pedagogy, and People Washington, DC January 9, 2009
  2. 2. Our ePortfolio Team <ul><li>Juliet Blank-Godlove, Director of Leadership Education and Development </li></ul><ul><li>Darren Cambridge, Asst. Professor, New Century College </li></ul><ul><li>Kara Danner, Director, Portal Communications </li></ul><ul><li>Kimberly Eby, Assc. Provost for Faculty Development/Director, CTE </li></ul><ul><li>Heather Hare, Asst. Director, Center for Leadership and Community Engagement </li></ul><ul><li>Julie Owen, Asst. Professor, New Century College </li></ul><ul><li>Lesley Smith, Assc. Professor, New Century College </li></ul>
  3. 3. Complicating Evidence <ul><li>Link between evidence and reflection distinguishes eportfolios and other digital means for </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Supporting reflective learning </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Managing and assessing information about knowledge, skills, abilities and experiences </li></ul></ul><ul><li>“ Evidence” is the documents included in a portfolio on which the author reflects </li></ul><ul><li>Use of evidence in practice is more complex than the eportfolio literature often acknowledges </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Whitehaus (2005) makes the same argument for writing in general </li></ul></ul>
  4. 5. Evidence in Reflection <ul><li>Research at Alverno College suggests that, as students become more skilled at reflection, they </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Draw on analysis of their own experiences rather than appealing to external authorities </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Reference a wider range of activities and artifacts </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Research deals only with the content of the reflections, not the evidence itself </li></ul>
  5. 6. Types of Evidence <ul><li>Types of evidence in science portfolios (Collins, 1992): </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Artifacts </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Attestations </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Reproductions </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Focuses on context of creation rather than role in portfolio </li></ul>
  6. 7. Project Background <ul><li>Portfolio contexts: Integrative approach to learning with specific attention to classroom-based, experiential, and co-curricular learning </li></ul><ul><li>NCC and portfolio-based assessment </li></ul><ul><li>Intentional collaboration with University Life </li></ul><ul><li>Small data sets over two cohorts (spring ’07; spring ’08); additional cohort beginning in fall ’08 </li></ul><ul><li>Member of cohort 3 of the Inter/National Coalition for Electronic Portfolio Research (I/NCEPR) </li></ul><ul><li>Design research and grounded theory </li></ul>
  7. 8. An Emergent Typology of Use of Evidence in ePortfolios <ul><li>Characteristics of item used as evidence </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Agency </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Media </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Purpose of incorporating evidence </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Rhetorical Function </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Object </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Characteristics of associated learning activities </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Sponsorship </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Participation </li></ul></ul>
  8. 9. Matches and Mismatches <ul><li>Reflective description of evidence </li></ul><ul><li>Content of evidence </li></ul><ul><li>Local – site of specific evidence use </li></ul><ul><li>Global – the whole portfolio </li></ul><ul><li>Match and mismatches yield more sophisticated understanding and resources for supporting portfolio authors </li></ul>
  9. 10. An Example: Richard Zepp’s ePortfolio
  10. 17. Patterns for Further Investigation <ul><li>Media </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Match of mismatch between content of images and reflection </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Do images require more framing, or do educators need to become better readers of images? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Do images reveal more tacit / unconscious understanding than text? </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Level of participation </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Match or mismatch between level of participation in content of evidence and reflection </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Is this do to the legacy of the portfolio as a highly individualistic, print genre? </li></ul></ul>
  11. 18. We’d love to hear from you <ul><li>Darren Cambridge, Lesley Smith, </li></ul><ul><li> . (Slides from this presentation will be linked to from this site.) </li></ul><ul><li>More information about New Century College: </li></ul><ul><li>More information about University Life: </li></ul>