GONE MISSING...…             HAPPEN, SIR?
A puzzling equation
In 1928 a young physicist named Paul Dirac created an equation to
describe the behaviour of an electro...
The missing antimatter                                           Capturing antiparticles
    To help unravel the mystery o...
Is antimatter useful?                                                              Could antimatter power vehicles in the
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5

Cern brochure-2009-001-eng


Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Cern brochure-2009-001-eng

  1. 1. ANTIMATTER’S WHEN DID THIS GONE MISSING...… HAPPEN, SIR? ABOUT 15 BILLION YEARS AGO...… LOST-PROPERTY OFFICE rettam fo egami rorrim A Antimatter From the beginning of the Universe, it seems there was a subtle favouritism for the matter that makes up the world we live in today. Without it we would not exist - there would be no stars, no planets and no people – just energy. It all started in the intense heat of the Big Bang, where particles of matter were forged out of pure energy. But for every particle of matter created, a ‘twin’ was also born - an ‘antiparticle’ identical in mass but with oppo- site electric charge. For the first few instants of its existence the Universe was balanced, with matter and antimatter created in equal abundance. Then just one second after the Big Bang, the antimatter had all but disappeared, together with almost all the matter, leaving a minute amount of matter alone to form everything that we see around us – from the stars and galaxies, to the Earth and all life that it sup- ports. So what happened to all the antimatter? This is one of the great puzzles of particle physics and one that physi- cists at CERN are working to try and solve.
  2. 2. A puzzling equation In 1928 a young physicist named Paul Dirac created an equation to describe the behaviour of an electron. But there was something odd – he found it could have two solutions, one for the electron and one for an almost identical particle, with opposite electric charge. Four years later Dirac’s extraordinary theory was proved right, when the The LHCb experiment first anti-electron (called a positron, because of its positive charge) was discovered among the tracks of cosmic rays. i m  Through the looking glass In fact, all matter particles have an antiparticle. Like a mirror version of normal matter, these antiparticles can come together to form antimatter. Dirac even suggested that there could be whole regions of the Universe composed entirely of antimatter: complete anti- galaxies with anti-stars and anti-planets. But we could never live in such antimatter worlds. If you ever set foot on an antimatter planet you would disappear. Complete annihilation When matter and antimatter come into contact they completely annihilate. This explosive relationship raises some intriguing questions. If matter and antimatter were created in equal quantities during the Big Bang, why do we find ourselves living in a Universe that seems to be made only of matter? Could some unknown mechanism have stepped in to prevent matter and antimatter from completely annihilating each other? Or could vast clusters of antimatter still exist in some far-flung corner of the Universe, as Dirac thought? A natural favouritism Today there is still no evidence for large-scale clumps of antimatter If you ever met an anti-you, in the blink of an eye in the Universe, but experiments performed over the past 40 years you would both vanish, destroying one another have shown a small difference in behaviour between some particles and leaving behind a flash of energy. and their antiparticles. This slight asymmetry (known as CP violation) has a subtle ‘favouritism’ for normal matter, but it is not enough to explain why antimatter has disappeared from the Universe.
  3. 3. The missing antimatter Capturing antiparticles To help unravel the mystery of the missing antimatter we The Antiproton Decelerator (AD) looks a lot like CERN’s other first need to create antiparticles. These can be created particle accelerators, but in fact it slows particles down! in particle accelerators that simulate the high-energy High-energy antiprotons made during collisions of ordinary conditions that existed at the beginning of the Universe, matter are collected and slowed to almost a standstill, but it is still far from easy to make antimatter. Only in 1995 before being trapped inside magnetic cages. Using this did an experiment at CERN make the first few atoms of method in 2002 the ATHENA and ATRAP experiments at antihydrogen. CERN combined ‘trapped’ antiprotons with anti-electrons (positrons) to make thousands of antihydrogen atoms. Now ATRAP together with new experiments, ALPHA and Broken symmetry AEGIS, will study antihydrogen to see whether it behaves Inside the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) exotic antiparticles just like hydrogen. will be created as particles collide head-on at nearly the speed of light. All of the four large LHC experiments will be on the look out for antimatter, but LHCb in particular Into the unknown is devoted to this task. The experiment is studying ‘CP Under assembly at CERN, the AMS experiment will be violation’ through a slight difference in decay between sent up to the International Space Station to hunt for the beauty quark and its antiparticle. Elsewhere at CERN antiparticles coming from space, in the hope of finding the NA62 experiment will also be looking for decay evidence of huge ‘clumps’ of antimatter out in the cosmos, differences between unstable particles called kaons and such as entire anti-galaxies. their antiparticles. These differences show that matter and t antimatter aren’t perfect opposites: there is a ‘violation’ of the symmetry between them. Studying this asymmetry between particles and antiparticles might help to reveal why antimatter has disappeared. The ATRAP experiment The AMS experiment
  4. 4. Is antimatter useful? Could antimatter power vehicles in the At CERN antimatter is mainly used to study the laws of future, like the Starship Enterprise? nature, but this research can lead to new applications. Anti- There is no possibility to use antimatter as an electrons (positrons) are already used in Positron-Emission energy ‘source’. Unlike solar energy, coal or oil, Tomography (PET) scanners for medical imaging in hospi- antimatter does not occur in nature; we first have tals. One day it might even be possible to use antiprotons to make every single antiparticle, and we have to for tumour irradiation, the first stages of which are being invest much more energy studied at the Antimatter Cell Experiment (ACE) at CERN. It than we get back during has already found that anti- annihilation. protons are four times more efficient at destroying can- cerous cells than protons. 3 3 200 180 2 2 Can we make 160 Could antimat- a n t i m a t t e r 140 1 1 bombs as in the ter be stolen 120 story ‘Angels and from CERN? 0 0 Demons’? 100 Impossible! It is very At the current rate of production it would 80 difficult to contain -1 take over 2 billion years to produce enough -1 antiparticles, because antimatter (about one gram) for a bomb 60 as soon as they touch with the same destructiveness as a ‘typical’ 40 normal matter they will -2 -2 nuclear bomb. In fact if we could assemble all the immediately annihilate. So 20 antimatter ever made at CERN and annihilate it with to steal antimatter you would -3 matter, we would only have enough energy to light 0 -3 also need to take the storage -1 -3 -2 0 1 2 3 a single electric light bulb for a few1minutes. 3 -3 -2 -1 0 2 machines. These ‘magnetic traps’ need a superconducting magnet and cryogenic equipment weighing several tonnes, Figure 3 and even this can only store less than a trillionth of a gram a, Colour contour plot of the distribution, obtained by b, The same plot as above, but for hot mixing. of antimatter. projecting into the plane perpendicular to the These data are normalized to represent the magnetic field, the vertex positions of reconstructed same number of mixing cycles (165) as those in events during cold mixing. All reconstructed part a. CERN antiproton annihilation vertices from the mixing region European Organization for Nuclear are plotted – no crystal cuts are applied. The trap Research inner radius is 1.25 cm. The annihilations are CH-1211 Geneva 23 centered on a slightly smaller radius, in agreement with our Monte Carlo simulations. (Some events the European Organization for Nuclear Research, was founded in CERN, Communication Group, February 2009 appear to be outside of the trap radius due to vertex It has become a prime example of international collaboration, with 1954. CERN-Brochure-2009-001-Eng reconstruction errors.) currently 20 Member States. It sits astride the Franco-Swiss border near Geneva and is the biggest particle physics laboratory in the world. Images: CERN Photo Service, NASA, André-Pierre Olivier. Cartoons: Fiami