American Student Loans

G
Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion
American Student Loans
Paolo Guasoni1,2
Yu-Jui Huang3
Dublin City University1
Università di Bologna2
University of Colorado at Boulder3
SIAM Conference on Financial Mathematics and Engineering
June 6th
, 2023
Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion
Outline
• Student Loans’ Features.
• Income-Driven Repayments and Forgiveness.
• Optimal Repayment and Valuation.
• Modeling Non-capitalized interest.
Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion
Largest Debt Type after Mortgages ($ Trillions)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Student Loans Car Loans Credit Cards
Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion
Federal Student Loans
• Borrow for tuition and living expenses while in college.
• Six months after graduation, repayments begin.
• By default, 10-year loans with fixed interest rate.
• Loans taken in different years may have different rates.
• Rates decided by Federal Government annually.
• Three types with different annual rates and borrowing limits.
Undergraduate 4.99% $57,500
Graduate or Professional 6.54% $138,500
PLUS 7.54% +∞
• Early repayments can be made without penalty, as for US mortgages.
• Pandemic pause with 0% rate.
Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion
Income-Driven Repayment and Forgiveness
• Enrolling in an income-driven repayment schemes triggers several
features.
• Monthly payments capped at 10% of disposable income above 150% of
poverty level. (No payments if income is lower.)
• Loans are forgiven after 20-25 years...
• ...but forgiven amount is taxable. Forgiven only in part.
(Forgiveness tax-free through 2025, but very few loans are affected.)
(Exception: PSLF forgives loans after 10 years, and no tax is due.)
• To enroll or not to enroll? When to enroll?
• High stakes in some sectors.
Median student loan balance for dental school graduates: $292,000
Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion
The Tradeoff
• Income-Driven Repayment means lower payments today.
• And delaying long enough may trigger forgiveness.
• But it also means more interest accruing to the loan.
• Without forgiveness, it would be cheapest to pay as soon as possible.
• Forgiveness creates a tension with accrued interest.
• How to minimize costs?
Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion
Literature
• Very little work in comparison to market size.
• Especially as student loans are so close to academia.
• More student loans:
(i) reduce home ownership (Mezza et al., 2019)
(ii) inhibit propensity to entrepreneurship (Krishnan and Wang, 2019)...
(iii) ... and public sector employment (Rothstein and Rouse, 2011)
(iv) delay marriage (Gicheva, 2016)
(v) postpone parenthood (Shao, 2015)...
(vi) ...enrollment in graduate degrees (Malcom and Dowd, 2012; Zhang, 2013)
(vii) increase parental cohabitation (Bleemer et al., 2014; Dettling and Hsu, 2018)
• Defaults counterintuitive:
(i) perhaps due to borrowers’ insufficient information (Delisle et al., 2018)
(ii) “majority of distressed student borrowers have their loans in disadvantageous
repayment plans even when eligible for more advantageous options”
(Cornaggia and Xia, 2020)
(iii) delinquency rate decreases as loan balances increase.
(iv) over 30% of loans less than $5,000 in default (Looney and Yannelis, 2019)
• $1 increase in maximum loan linked to increase of 60c in tuition price.
(Lucca et al., 2018). The “Bennett” hypothesis.
Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion
Model
• Borrower must repay balance x > 0.
• Discounts cash flows at rate r > 0.
• Borrowers’ opportunity cost, non necessarily risk-free rate.
• If borrower has a mortgage, mortgage rate is a useful benchmark for r.
• Loan carries higher interest rate r + β, β > 0.
Otherwise problem trivial: pay as late as you can.
• Balance evolution:
dbα
t = (r + β)bα
t dt − αt dt, b0 = x > 0
• αt : chosen repayment rate.
• Deterministic model. Goal is minimizing cost.
• Optimal solution already reduces risk through income-driven repayment.
Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion
Constraints and Forgiveness
• Repayment rate:
m(t) ≤ αt ≤ M(t)
• m(t): minimum payment required by repayment plan.
• M(t): maximum payment affordable to borrower.
• At time T > 0 the remaining balance bα
T is forgiven.
• Forgiven amount taxed at rate ω ∈ (0, 1).
• Total cost of loan:
J(x, α) :=
Z τ
0
e−rt
αt dt + e−rτ
ωbτ ,
• τ := inf{t ≥ 0 : bt = 0} ∧ T: time loan is paid off or forgiven.
Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion
The Critical Horizon
tc :=

T +
log ω
β
+
• Before this time, prepaying an extra dollar saves more than one dollar in
future payments.
• If forgiveness is near, there is no incentive to prepay.
• Critical horizon depends on time to forgiveness, on the interest spread,
and on the tax rate.
• It is zero if the spread is high or the tax rate is low.
• If there were no payment constraints m, M, it would be optimal to prepay
before this time and not prepay after.
• But there are constraints.
Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion
Optimal Repayment
Theorem
For any x  0, the strategy α∗
∈ A defined as
α∗
t :=
(
M(t)1[0,tc ](t) + m(t)1(tc ,T](t) t ∈ [0, T], if x  x∗
, (max-min)
M(t) t ∈ [0, T], if x ≤ x∗
, (max)
attains the minimum loan value. Also, v(x) = v1(x) for x  x∗
and
v(x) = v2(x) for x ≤ x∗
, where
v1(x) :=
tc
Z
0
e−rs
Msds +
T
Z
tc
e−rs
msds+ ωeβT

x−
tc
Z
0
e−(r+β)s
Msds−
T
Z
tc
e−(r+β)s
msds

 ,
v2(x) :=
tM
Z
0
e−rs
Msds, where tM  0 satisfies x =
Z tM
0
e−(r+β)s
Msds.
• What is x∗
?
Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion
The Critical Balance
• If the balance is low (x  x∗
), max strategy. (Pay as soon as possible.)
• If the balance is high (x  x∗
), max-min strategy.
Pay maximum before critical horizon, then minimum.
• If critical horizon is zero, always pay minimum.
• Critical balance is the balance for which two strategies are equivalent.
x∗
:=
Z t∗
0
e−(r+β)s
M(s)ds  0,
• t∗
∈ (tc, T) is the unique solution to
Z t∗
tc
e−rs
M(s)(1 − ωeβ(T−s)
)ds =
Z T
tc
e−rs
m(s)(1 − ωeβ(T−s)
)ds.
Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion
Critical Balance
100000
125000
150000
175000
200000
225000
250000
275000
300000
325000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
0
2
4
6
8
10
• Horizontal: loan spread β. Vertical: discount rate r.
• Forgiveness horizon T = 25, annual growth of income and poverty level
g = 4%, tax rate ω = 40%, minimum and maximum payments are 10%
and 30% of income above subsistence of $32,000.
Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion
Critical Balance
• Highly nonlinear in model parameters.
• Higher with a lower spread.
• Higher for very high or very low discount rate.
• It suffices to compare the cost of the two candidate strategies.
Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion
To Enroll or not to Enroll? And When?
0 100000 200000 300000 400000
10
15
20
25
30
0 100000 200000 300000 400000
10
15
20
25
30
0 100000 200000 300000 400000
10
15
20
25
30
• Horizontal: loan balance. Vertical: forgiveness horizon.
• Vertical lines: maximum borrowing
• Light: immediate enrollment in income-driven repayment.
• Dark: later enrollment.
Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion
Loan Valuation
0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
• Cost-to-balance ratio (vertical) against loan balance (horizontal) for PLUS
loans (7.54% rate), with discount rate of 3% (solid) and 6% (dashed).
Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion
Loan Valuation
• Unit cost increases for small balances.
• Decreases for large balances.
• Forgiveness benefits only borrowers with big loans.
• For very large loans, the cost of an extra dollar is just ωeβT
.
Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion
Simple Interest
• Previous analysis omits a peculiar feature.
• For many income-driven schemes, interest is not capitalized.
• If the monthly payment does not cover interest,
the balance increases only by the interest accrued on the principal, not on
outstanding interest.
• But any payment is applied towards interest before the principal.
• Mathematically, what does it mean?
• The loans splits in two.
• The principal, carrying the original rate.
• Unpaid interest, carrying zero rate.
• But you cannot repay the principal while outstanding interest is zero.
• Simple interest is rather complicated.
• Two-dimensional problem?
Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion
Modeling Simple Interest
• The budget equation is replaced by
dbα
t = ((r + β)pα
t − αt )dt, b0 = x  0;
pα
t = inf
0≤s≤t
bα
s .
• Only the remaining principal generates interest.
• The remaining principal is the running minimum of the total balance,
because accrued interest must be repaid first.
• Define the first time of principal repayment:
θ(α) := inf {t ∈ [0, T] : pα
t  x}
Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion
Improving Repayments
Lemma
For any x  0,
(i) if θ(α) = T, then J(x, m) ≤ J(x, α).
(ii) if θ(α)  T, then there exists a unique t0 ∈ [0, θ(α)] that satisfies
Z θ(α)
0
αsds =
Z t0
0
m(s)ds +
Z θ(α)
t0
M(s)ds.
Moreover, α defined by
αt := m(t)1[0,t0](t) + M(t)1(t0,θ(α)] + αt 1(θ(α),T](t), ∀0 ≤ t ≤ T,
satisfies θ(α) = θ(α) and J(x, α) ≤ J(x, α).
• Minimum: cheapest strategy among those that never repay the principal.
• Otherwise can improve a strategy by starting with a min-max segment.
Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion
Max-Min in Positive Amortization
Lemma
Fix any x  0 and α ∈ A with θ(α)  T. Suppose that there exist
a, c ∈ [θ(α), T] with a  c such that t 7→ pα
t is strictly decreasing on [a, c]. If
α ∈ A does not belong to the collection
B[a,c] := {α ∈ A : ∃s0 ∈ [a, c] s.t. αt = M(t)1[a,s0]+m(t)1(s0,c](t) for a.e. t ∈ [a, c]},
then there exists u ∈ (a, c) such that α(u) ∈ A defined by
(α(u))t := αt 1[0,a](t) + M(t)1(a,u](t) + m(t)1(u,c](t) + αt 1(c,T](t) ∀t ∈ [0, T] (1)
satisfies J(x, α(u))  J(x, α).
• When amortization positive, first max then min.
• Constant payment rates strategies cannot be optimal.
• But constant payments are the default! Inaction is costly.
Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion
Optimal Strategy with Simple Interest
• For a large enough balance, minimum payments are optimal.
• For a small enough balance, maximum payments are optimal.
• For large balances, simple interest makes huge difference.
• Marginal cost of extra dollar for large loan:
• With compound interest ωe−rT
e(r+β)T
= ωeβT
(insensitive to discount rate r).
• With simple interest ωe−rT
(1 + (r + β)T) (depends on r).
• From $1.09 to $0.52 with r = 3%, β = 4%, ω = 40%, T = 25.
• A priori, we cannot rule out optimality of min-max-min.
• But we have not found any concrete setting where this happens.
• General result?
Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion
The Road Ahead
• Student Loans are very peculiar debt contracts.
• Features seem to have accumulated partly by design, partly by inertia.
• About quarter of loans in delinquency.
• Friedman (1955):
Such an investment necessarily involves much risk. [...] The result is
that if fixed money loans were made, and were secured only by ex-
pected future earnings, a considerable fraction would never be repaid.
• Financing college involves three parties: student, college, lender.
• With federal student loans, the lender is the government.
• Risk is shared between the student and the government.
• The university has no risk.
• Optimal arrangement?
Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion
Other Contracts
• Student loans are not the only types of contracts to finance college.
• Income-share agreements:
debt whose principal is contingent on the borrower’s income.
• Similarities and differences with income-driven repayment?
• How should risk be shared among students, lenders, and colleges?
• Colleges have more information on income-potential of various degrees.
• Which contracts are optimal for financing education?
Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion
Conclusion
• Model of federal student loans.
• Three features: income-driven repayment, forgiveness, simple interest.
• Complete solution for first two features.
• Partial results including simple interest.
• Minimum payments for large balances, maximum for small.
• Intermediate cases more complex.
• What are optimal contracts for education financing?
Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion
Thank You!
Questions?
https://epubs.siam.org/doi/10.1137/22M1505840
https://epubs.siam.org/doi/10.1137/21M1392267
1 of 26

Recommended

Loans (1) by
Loans (1)Loans (1)
Loans (1)Chhavi Verma
1K views37 slides
Assg 02 ClassesCOSC 2336 Data StructuresObjectives • Crea.docx by
Assg 02 ClassesCOSC 2336 Data StructuresObjectives • Crea.docxAssg 02 ClassesCOSC 2336 Data StructuresObjectives • Crea.docx
Assg 02 ClassesCOSC 2336 Data StructuresObjectives • Crea.docxjane3dyson92312
7 views8 slides
Chapter 8: Capital Financing for Health Care Providers by
Chapter 8: Capital Financing for Health Care ProvidersChapter 8: Capital Financing for Health Care Providers
Chapter 8: Capital Financing for Health Care ProvidersNada G.Youssef
3.8K views39 slides
GESTS410I.pdf by
GESTS410I.pdfGESTS410I.pdf
GESTS410I.pdfDaniYaramishyan
3 views28 slides
emNAFI2007 by
emNAFI2007emNAFI2007
emNAFI2007Elmar Mertens
418 views54 slides
05_Life Cycle Costing.pptx by
05_Life Cycle Costing.pptx05_Life Cycle Costing.pptx
05_Life Cycle Costing.pptxItxhamza
3 views30 slides

More Related Content

Similar to American Student Loans

Stanford CS 007-06 (2021): Personal Finance for Engineers / Debt by
Stanford CS 007-06 (2021): Personal Finance for Engineers / DebtStanford CS 007-06 (2021): Personal Finance for Engineers / Debt
Stanford CS 007-06 (2021): Personal Finance for Engineers / DebtAdam Nash
73.1K views30 slides
Introduction and Mathematical Foundations.ppt by
Introduction and Mathematical Foundations.pptIntroduction and Mathematical Foundations.ppt
Introduction and Mathematical Foundations.pptIbrahimKhatatbeh5
49 views59 slides
Stanford CS 007-06 (2019): Personal Finance for Engineers / Debt by
Stanford CS 007-06 (2019): Personal Finance for Engineers / DebtStanford CS 007-06 (2019): Personal Finance for Engineers / Debt
Stanford CS 007-06 (2019): Personal Finance for Engineers / DebtAdam Nash
119.6K views30 slides
Mid Term Paper by
Mid Term PaperMid Term Paper
Mid Term PaperSerena Brown
3 views59 slides
Stanford CS 007-06 (2018): Personal Finance for Engineers / Debt by
Stanford CS 007-06 (2018): Personal Finance for Engineers / DebtStanford CS 007-06 (2018): Personal Finance for Engineers / Debt
Stanford CS 007-06 (2018): Personal Finance for Engineers / DebtAdam Nash
2K views30 slides
Stanford CS 007-06: Personal Finance for Engineers / All About Debt by
Stanford CS 007-06: Personal Finance for Engineers / All About DebtStanford CS 007-06: Personal Finance for Engineers / All About Debt
Stanford CS 007-06: Personal Finance for Engineers / All About DebtAdam Nash
273.8K views30 slides

Similar to American Student Loans(20)

Stanford CS 007-06 (2021): Personal Finance for Engineers / Debt by Adam Nash
Stanford CS 007-06 (2021): Personal Finance for Engineers / DebtStanford CS 007-06 (2021): Personal Finance for Engineers / Debt
Stanford CS 007-06 (2021): Personal Finance for Engineers / Debt
Adam Nash73.1K views
Introduction and Mathematical Foundations.ppt by IbrahimKhatatbeh5
Introduction and Mathematical Foundations.pptIntroduction and Mathematical Foundations.ppt
Introduction and Mathematical Foundations.ppt
Stanford CS 007-06 (2019): Personal Finance for Engineers / Debt by Adam Nash
Stanford CS 007-06 (2019): Personal Finance for Engineers / DebtStanford CS 007-06 (2019): Personal Finance for Engineers / Debt
Stanford CS 007-06 (2019): Personal Finance for Engineers / Debt
Adam Nash119.6K views
Stanford CS 007-06 (2018): Personal Finance for Engineers / Debt by Adam Nash
Stanford CS 007-06 (2018): Personal Finance for Engineers / DebtStanford CS 007-06 (2018): Personal Finance for Engineers / Debt
Stanford CS 007-06 (2018): Personal Finance for Engineers / Debt
Adam Nash2K views
Stanford CS 007-06: Personal Finance for Engineers / All About Debt by Adam Nash
Stanford CS 007-06: Personal Finance for Engineers / All About DebtStanford CS 007-06: Personal Finance for Engineers / All About Debt
Stanford CS 007-06: Personal Finance for Engineers / All About Debt
Adam Nash273.8K views
Uk by bhara33
UkUk
Uk
bhara33214 views
Narrow banking with modern depository institutions: Is there a reason to pani... by ADEMU_Project
Narrow banking with modern depository institutions: Is there a reason to pani...Narrow banking with modern depository institutions: Is there a reason to pani...
Narrow banking with modern depository institutions: Is there a reason to pani...
ADEMU_Project477 views
Stanford CS 007-06 (2020): Personal Finance for Engineers / Debt by Adam Nash
Stanford CS 007-06 (2020): Personal Finance for Engineers / DebtStanford CS 007-06 (2020): Personal Finance for Engineers / Debt
Stanford CS 007-06 (2020): Personal Finance for Engineers / Debt
Adam Nash92K views
Chapter 6: The Time Value of Money by Nada G.Youssef
Chapter 6: The Time Value of MoneyChapter 6: The Time Value of Money
Chapter 6: The Time Value of Money
Nada G.Youssef14.9K views
Deposit Money Creation of commercial banks and its Determinants by Mahmoud Touny
Deposit Money Creation of commercial banks and its DeterminantsDeposit Money Creation of commercial banks and its Determinants
Deposit Money Creation of commercial banks and its Determinants
Mahmoud Touny24 views
Week1_Lecture2.ppt by Phanny ITH
Week1_Lecture2.pptWeek1_Lecture2.ppt
Week1_Lecture2.ppt
Phanny ITH6 views

More from guasoni

Rogue Traders by
Rogue TradersRogue Traders
Rogue Tradersguasoni
12 views23 slides
Incomplete-Market Equilibrium with Unhedgeable Fundamentals and Heterogeneous... by
Incomplete-Market Equilibrium with Unhedgeable Fundamentals and Heterogeneous...Incomplete-Market Equilibrium with Unhedgeable Fundamentals and Heterogeneous...
Incomplete-Market Equilibrium with Unhedgeable Fundamentals and Heterogeneous...guasoni
116 views31 slides
Lightning Network Economics: Channels by
Lightning Network Economics: ChannelsLightning Network Economics: Channels
Lightning Network Economics: Channelsguasoni
105 views118 slides
Reference Dependence: Endogenous Anchors and Life-Cycle Investing by
Reference Dependence: Endogenous Anchors and Life-Cycle InvestingReference Dependence: Endogenous Anchors and Life-Cycle Investing
Reference Dependence: Endogenous Anchors and Life-Cycle Investingguasoni
64 views44 slides
Sharing Profits in the Sharing Economy by
Sharing Profits in the Sharing EconomySharing Profits in the Sharing Economy
Sharing Profits in the Sharing Economyguasoni
48 views109 slides
Should Commodity Investors Follow Commodities' Prices? by
Should Commodity Investors Follow Commodities' Prices?Should Commodity Investors Follow Commodities' Prices?
Should Commodity Investors Follow Commodities' Prices?guasoni
291 views25 slides

More from guasoni(20)

Rogue Traders by guasoni
Rogue TradersRogue Traders
Rogue Traders
guasoni12 views
Incomplete-Market Equilibrium with Unhedgeable Fundamentals and Heterogeneous... by guasoni
Incomplete-Market Equilibrium with Unhedgeable Fundamentals and Heterogeneous...Incomplete-Market Equilibrium with Unhedgeable Fundamentals and Heterogeneous...
Incomplete-Market Equilibrium with Unhedgeable Fundamentals and Heterogeneous...
guasoni116 views
Lightning Network Economics: Channels by guasoni
Lightning Network Economics: ChannelsLightning Network Economics: Channels
Lightning Network Economics: Channels
guasoni105 views
Reference Dependence: Endogenous Anchors and Life-Cycle Investing by guasoni
Reference Dependence: Endogenous Anchors and Life-Cycle InvestingReference Dependence: Endogenous Anchors and Life-Cycle Investing
Reference Dependence: Endogenous Anchors and Life-Cycle Investing
guasoni64 views
Sharing Profits in the Sharing Economy by guasoni
Sharing Profits in the Sharing EconomySharing Profits in the Sharing Economy
Sharing Profits in the Sharing Economy
guasoni48 views
Should Commodity Investors Follow Commodities' Prices? by guasoni
Should Commodity Investors Follow Commodities' Prices?Should Commodity Investors Follow Commodities' Prices?
Should Commodity Investors Follow Commodities' Prices?
guasoni291 views
Asset Prices in Segmented and Integrated Markets by guasoni
Asset Prices in Segmented and Integrated MarketsAsset Prices in Segmented and Integrated Markets
Asset Prices in Segmented and Integrated Markets
guasoni306 views
Options Portfolio Selection by guasoni
Options Portfolio SelectionOptions Portfolio Selection
Options Portfolio Selection
guasoni560 views
Healthcare and Consumption with Aging by guasoni
Healthcare and Consumption with AgingHealthcare and Consumption with Aging
Healthcare and Consumption with Aging
guasoni683 views
Leveraged ETFs Performance Evaluation by guasoni
Leveraged ETFs Performance EvaluationLeveraged ETFs Performance Evaluation
Leveraged ETFs Performance Evaluation
guasoni1.3K views
Who Should Sell Stocks? by guasoni
Who Should Sell Stocks?Who Should Sell Stocks?
Who Should Sell Stocks?
guasoni826 views
Nonlinear Price Impact and Portfolio Choice by guasoni
Nonlinear Price Impact and Portfolio ChoiceNonlinear Price Impact and Portfolio Choice
Nonlinear Price Impact and Portfolio Choice
guasoni1.2K views
Hedging, Arbitrage, and Optimality with Superlinear Frictions by guasoni
Hedging, Arbitrage, and Optimality with Superlinear FrictionsHedging, Arbitrage, and Optimality with Superlinear Frictions
Hedging, Arbitrage, and Optimality with Superlinear Frictions
guasoni1K views
Shortfall Aversion by guasoni
Shortfall AversionShortfall Aversion
Shortfall Aversion
guasoni1.4K views
The Limits of Leverage by guasoni
The Limits of LeverageThe Limits of Leverage
The Limits of Leverage
guasoni1.2K views
Spending and Investment for Shortfall-Averse Endowments by guasoni
Spending and Investment for Shortfall-Averse EndowmentsSpending and Investment for Shortfall-Averse Endowments
Spending and Investment for Shortfall-Averse Endowments
guasoni622 views
UT Austin - Portugal Lectures on Portfolio Choice by guasoni
UT Austin - Portugal Lectures on Portfolio ChoiceUT Austin - Portugal Lectures on Portfolio Choice
UT Austin - Portugal Lectures on Portfolio Choice
guasoni904 views
Dynamic Trading Volume by guasoni
Dynamic Trading VolumeDynamic Trading Volume
Dynamic Trading Volume
guasoni1.8K views
Transaction Costs Made Tractable by guasoni
Transaction Costs Made TractableTransaction Costs Made Tractable
Transaction Costs Made Tractable
guasoni1.1K views
Abstract, Classic, and Explicit Turnpikes by guasoni
Abstract, Classic, and Explicit TurnpikesAbstract, Classic, and Explicit Turnpikes
Abstract, Classic, and Explicit Turnpikes
guasoni1.5K views

Recently uploaded

score 10000.pdf by
score 10000.pdfscore 10000.pdf
score 10000.pdfsadimd007
8 views1 slide
TriStar Gold- Corporate Presentation - December 2023 by
TriStar Gold- Corporate Presentation - December 2023TriStar Gold- Corporate Presentation - December 2023
TriStar Gold- Corporate Presentation - December 2023Adnet Communications
38 views14 slides
Debt Watch | ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund by
Debt Watch | ICICI Prudential Mutual FundDebt Watch | ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund
Debt Watch | ICICI Prudential Mutual Fundiciciprumf
6 views2 slides
OAT_RI_Ep14 WeighingTheRisks_Nov23_GeopoliticalConcerns.pptx by
OAT_RI_Ep14 WeighingTheRisks_Nov23_GeopoliticalConcerns.pptxOAT_RI_Ep14 WeighingTheRisks_Nov23_GeopoliticalConcerns.pptx
OAT_RI_Ep14 WeighingTheRisks_Nov23_GeopoliticalConcerns.pptxhiddenlevers
15 views4 slides
Macro Economics- Group Presentation for Germany by
Macro Economics- Group Presentation for Germany Macro Economics- Group Presentation for Germany
Macro Economics- Group Presentation for Germany BethanyAline
38 views24 slides
01-SamcoMF DAAF_IDBIBank_page-0001.pdf by
01-SamcoMF DAAF_IDBIBank_page-0001.pdf01-SamcoMF DAAF_IDBIBank_page-0001.pdf
01-SamcoMF DAAF_IDBIBank_page-0001.pdfmultigainfinancial
7 views2 slides

Recently uploaded(20)

score 10000.pdf by sadimd007
score 10000.pdfscore 10000.pdf
score 10000.pdf
sadimd0078 views
Debt Watch | ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund by iciciprumf
Debt Watch | ICICI Prudential Mutual FundDebt Watch | ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund
Debt Watch | ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund
iciciprumf6 views
OAT_RI_Ep14 WeighingTheRisks_Nov23_GeopoliticalConcerns.pptx by hiddenlevers
OAT_RI_Ep14 WeighingTheRisks_Nov23_GeopoliticalConcerns.pptxOAT_RI_Ep14 WeighingTheRisks_Nov23_GeopoliticalConcerns.pptx
OAT_RI_Ep14 WeighingTheRisks_Nov23_GeopoliticalConcerns.pptx
hiddenlevers15 views
Macro Economics- Group Presentation for Germany by BethanyAline
Macro Economics- Group Presentation for Germany Macro Economics- Group Presentation for Germany
Macro Economics- Group Presentation for Germany
BethanyAline38 views
GroupPresentation_MicroEconomics by BethanyAline
GroupPresentation_MicroEconomicsGroupPresentation_MicroEconomics
GroupPresentation_MicroEconomics
BethanyAline33 views
The breath of the investment grade and the unpredictability of inflation - Eu... by Antonis Zairis
The breath of the investment grade and the unpredictability of inflation - Eu...The breath of the investment grade and the unpredictability of inflation - Eu...
The breath of the investment grade and the unpredictability of inflation - Eu...
Antonis Zairis7 views
Teaching Third Generation Islamic Economics by Asad Zaman
Teaching Third Generation Islamic EconomicsTeaching Third Generation Islamic Economics
Teaching Third Generation Islamic Economics
Asad Zaman52 views
Development Economics.pptx by Nithin Kumar
Development Economics.pptxDevelopment Economics.pptx
Development Economics.pptx
Nithin Kumar9 views
What is Credit Default Swaps by MksSkyView
What is Credit Default SwapsWhat is Credit Default Swaps
What is Credit Default Swaps
MksSkyView8 views
Topic 37 copy.pptx by saleh176
Topic 37 copy.pptxTopic 37 copy.pptx
Topic 37 copy.pptx
saleh1765 views
QNBFS Daily Market Report November 29, 2023 by QNB Group
QNBFS Daily Market Report November 29, 2023QNBFS Daily Market Report November 29, 2023
QNBFS Daily Market Report November 29, 2023
QNB Group9 views
Jeremy Hunt's letter to Nausicaa Delfas by Henry Tapper
Jeremy Hunt's letter to Nausicaa DelfasJeremy Hunt's letter to Nausicaa Delfas
Jeremy Hunt's letter to Nausicaa Delfas
Henry Tapper516 views
Pandit No2 Black Magic Specialist In Lahore Black magic In Pakistan Kala Ilam... by Amil baba
Pandit No2 Black Magic Specialist In Lahore Black magic In Pakistan Kala Ilam...Pandit No2 Black Magic Specialist In Lahore Black magic In Pakistan Kala Ilam...
Pandit No2 Black Magic Specialist In Lahore Black magic In Pakistan Kala Ilam...
Amil baba6 views

American Student Loans

  • 1. Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion American Student Loans Paolo Guasoni1,2 Yu-Jui Huang3 Dublin City University1 Università di Bologna2 University of Colorado at Boulder3 SIAM Conference on Financial Mathematics and Engineering June 6th , 2023
  • 2. Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion Outline • Student Loans’ Features. • Income-Driven Repayments and Forgiveness. • Optimal Repayment and Valuation. • Modeling Non-capitalized interest.
  • 3. Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion Largest Debt Type after Mortgages ($ Trillions) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Student Loans Car Loans Credit Cards
  • 4. Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion Federal Student Loans • Borrow for tuition and living expenses while in college. • Six months after graduation, repayments begin. • By default, 10-year loans with fixed interest rate. • Loans taken in different years may have different rates. • Rates decided by Federal Government annually. • Three types with different annual rates and borrowing limits. Undergraduate 4.99% $57,500 Graduate or Professional 6.54% $138,500 PLUS 7.54% +∞ • Early repayments can be made without penalty, as for US mortgages. • Pandemic pause with 0% rate.
  • 5. Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion Income-Driven Repayment and Forgiveness • Enrolling in an income-driven repayment schemes triggers several features. • Monthly payments capped at 10% of disposable income above 150% of poverty level. (No payments if income is lower.) • Loans are forgiven after 20-25 years... • ...but forgiven amount is taxable. Forgiven only in part. (Forgiveness tax-free through 2025, but very few loans are affected.) (Exception: PSLF forgives loans after 10 years, and no tax is due.) • To enroll or not to enroll? When to enroll? • High stakes in some sectors. Median student loan balance for dental school graduates: $292,000
  • 6. Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion The Tradeoff • Income-Driven Repayment means lower payments today. • And delaying long enough may trigger forgiveness. • But it also means more interest accruing to the loan. • Without forgiveness, it would be cheapest to pay as soon as possible. • Forgiveness creates a tension with accrued interest. • How to minimize costs?
  • 7. Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion Literature • Very little work in comparison to market size. • Especially as student loans are so close to academia. • More student loans: (i) reduce home ownership (Mezza et al., 2019) (ii) inhibit propensity to entrepreneurship (Krishnan and Wang, 2019)... (iii) ... and public sector employment (Rothstein and Rouse, 2011) (iv) delay marriage (Gicheva, 2016) (v) postpone parenthood (Shao, 2015)... (vi) ...enrollment in graduate degrees (Malcom and Dowd, 2012; Zhang, 2013) (vii) increase parental cohabitation (Bleemer et al., 2014; Dettling and Hsu, 2018) • Defaults counterintuitive: (i) perhaps due to borrowers’ insufficient information (Delisle et al., 2018) (ii) “majority of distressed student borrowers have their loans in disadvantageous repayment plans even when eligible for more advantageous options” (Cornaggia and Xia, 2020) (iii) delinquency rate decreases as loan balances increase. (iv) over 30% of loans less than $5,000 in default (Looney and Yannelis, 2019) • $1 increase in maximum loan linked to increase of 60c in tuition price. (Lucca et al., 2018). The “Bennett” hypothesis.
  • 8. Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion Model • Borrower must repay balance x > 0. • Discounts cash flows at rate r > 0. • Borrowers’ opportunity cost, non necessarily risk-free rate. • If borrower has a mortgage, mortgage rate is a useful benchmark for r. • Loan carries higher interest rate r + β, β > 0. Otherwise problem trivial: pay as late as you can. • Balance evolution: dbα t = (r + β)bα t dt − αt dt, b0 = x > 0 • αt : chosen repayment rate. • Deterministic model. Goal is minimizing cost. • Optimal solution already reduces risk through income-driven repayment.
  • 9. Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion Constraints and Forgiveness • Repayment rate: m(t) ≤ αt ≤ M(t) • m(t): minimum payment required by repayment plan. • M(t): maximum payment affordable to borrower. • At time T > 0 the remaining balance bα T is forgiven. • Forgiven amount taxed at rate ω ∈ (0, 1). • Total cost of loan: J(x, α) := Z τ 0 e−rt αt dt + e−rτ ωbτ , • τ := inf{t ≥ 0 : bt = 0} ∧ T: time loan is paid off or forgiven.
  • 10. Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion The Critical Horizon tc := T + log ω β + • Before this time, prepaying an extra dollar saves more than one dollar in future payments. • If forgiveness is near, there is no incentive to prepay. • Critical horizon depends on time to forgiveness, on the interest spread, and on the tax rate. • It is zero if the spread is high or the tax rate is low. • If there were no payment constraints m, M, it would be optimal to prepay before this time and not prepay after. • But there are constraints.
  • 11. Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion Optimal Repayment Theorem For any x 0, the strategy α∗ ∈ A defined as α∗ t := ( M(t)1[0,tc ](t) + m(t)1(tc ,T](t) t ∈ [0, T], if x x∗ , (max-min) M(t) t ∈ [0, T], if x ≤ x∗ , (max) attains the minimum loan value. Also, v(x) = v1(x) for x x∗ and v(x) = v2(x) for x ≤ x∗ , where v1(x) := tc Z 0 e−rs Msds + T Z tc e−rs msds+ ωeβT  x− tc Z 0 e−(r+β)s Msds− T Z tc e−(r+β)s msds   , v2(x) := tM Z 0 e−rs Msds, where tM 0 satisfies x = Z tM 0 e−(r+β)s Msds. • What is x∗ ?
  • 12. Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion The Critical Balance • If the balance is low (x x∗ ), max strategy. (Pay as soon as possible.) • If the balance is high (x x∗ ), max-min strategy. Pay maximum before critical horizon, then minimum. • If critical horizon is zero, always pay minimum. • Critical balance is the balance for which two strategies are equivalent. x∗ := Z t∗ 0 e−(r+β)s M(s)ds 0, • t∗ ∈ (tc, T) is the unique solution to Z t∗ tc e−rs M(s)(1 − ωeβ(T−s) )ds = Z T tc e−rs m(s)(1 − ωeβ(T−s) )ds.
  • 13. Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion Critical Balance 100000 125000 150000 175000 200000 225000 250000 275000 300000 325000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 2 4 6 8 10 • Horizontal: loan spread β. Vertical: discount rate r. • Forgiveness horizon T = 25, annual growth of income and poverty level g = 4%, tax rate ω = 40%, minimum and maximum payments are 10% and 30% of income above subsistence of $32,000.
  • 14. Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion Critical Balance • Highly nonlinear in model parameters. • Higher with a lower spread. • Higher for very high or very low discount rate. • It suffices to compare the cost of the two candidate strategies.
  • 15. Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion To Enroll or not to Enroll? And When? 0 100000 200000 300000 400000 10 15 20 25 30 0 100000 200000 300000 400000 10 15 20 25 30 0 100000 200000 300000 400000 10 15 20 25 30 • Horizontal: loan balance. Vertical: forgiveness horizon. • Vertical lines: maximum borrowing • Light: immediate enrollment in income-driven repayment. • Dark: later enrollment.
  • 16. Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion Loan Valuation 0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 • Cost-to-balance ratio (vertical) against loan balance (horizontal) for PLUS loans (7.54% rate), with discount rate of 3% (solid) and 6% (dashed).
  • 17. Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion Loan Valuation • Unit cost increases for small balances. • Decreases for large balances. • Forgiveness benefits only borrowers with big loans. • For very large loans, the cost of an extra dollar is just ωeβT .
  • 18. Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion Simple Interest • Previous analysis omits a peculiar feature. • For many income-driven schemes, interest is not capitalized. • If the monthly payment does not cover interest, the balance increases only by the interest accrued on the principal, not on outstanding interest. • But any payment is applied towards interest before the principal. • Mathematically, what does it mean? • The loans splits in two. • The principal, carrying the original rate. • Unpaid interest, carrying zero rate. • But you cannot repay the principal while outstanding interest is zero. • Simple interest is rather complicated. • Two-dimensional problem?
  • 19. Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion Modeling Simple Interest • The budget equation is replaced by dbα t = ((r + β)pα t − αt )dt, b0 = x 0; pα t = inf 0≤s≤t bα s . • Only the remaining principal generates interest. • The remaining principal is the running minimum of the total balance, because accrued interest must be repaid first. • Define the first time of principal repayment: θ(α) := inf {t ∈ [0, T] : pα t x}
  • 20. Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion Improving Repayments Lemma For any x 0, (i) if θ(α) = T, then J(x, m) ≤ J(x, α). (ii) if θ(α) T, then there exists a unique t0 ∈ [0, θ(α)] that satisfies Z θ(α) 0 αsds = Z t0 0 m(s)ds + Z θ(α) t0 M(s)ds. Moreover, α defined by αt := m(t)1[0,t0](t) + M(t)1(t0,θ(α)] + αt 1(θ(α),T](t), ∀0 ≤ t ≤ T, satisfies θ(α) = θ(α) and J(x, α) ≤ J(x, α). • Minimum: cheapest strategy among those that never repay the principal. • Otherwise can improve a strategy by starting with a min-max segment.
  • 21. Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion Max-Min in Positive Amortization Lemma Fix any x 0 and α ∈ A with θ(α) T. Suppose that there exist a, c ∈ [θ(α), T] with a c such that t 7→ pα t is strictly decreasing on [a, c]. If α ∈ A does not belong to the collection B[a,c] := {α ∈ A : ∃s0 ∈ [a, c] s.t. αt = M(t)1[a,s0]+m(t)1(s0,c](t) for a.e. t ∈ [a, c]}, then there exists u ∈ (a, c) such that α(u) ∈ A defined by (α(u))t := αt 1[0,a](t) + M(t)1(a,u](t) + m(t)1(u,c](t) + αt 1(c,T](t) ∀t ∈ [0, T] (1) satisfies J(x, α(u)) J(x, α). • When amortization positive, first max then min. • Constant payment rates strategies cannot be optimal. • But constant payments are the default! Inaction is costly.
  • 22. Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion Optimal Strategy with Simple Interest • For a large enough balance, minimum payments are optimal. • For a small enough balance, maximum payments are optimal. • For large balances, simple interest makes huge difference. • Marginal cost of extra dollar for large loan: • With compound interest ωe−rT e(r+β)T = ωeβT (insensitive to discount rate r). • With simple interest ωe−rT (1 + (r + β)T) (depends on r). • From $1.09 to $0.52 with r = 3%, β = 4%, ω = 40%, T = 25. • A priori, we cannot rule out optimality of min-max-min. • But we have not found any concrete setting where this happens. • General result?
  • 23. Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion The Road Ahead • Student Loans are very peculiar debt contracts. • Features seem to have accumulated partly by design, partly by inertia. • About quarter of loans in delinquency. • Friedman (1955): Such an investment necessarily involves much risk. [...] The result is that if fixed money loans were made, and were secured only by ex- pected future earnings, a considerable fraction would never be repaid. • Financing college involves three parties: student, college, lender. • With federal student loans, the lender is the government. • Risk is shared between the student and the government. • The university has no risk. • Optimal arrangement?
  • 24. Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion Other Contracts • Student loans are not the only types of contracts to finance college. • Income-share agreements: debt whose principal is contingent on the borrower’s income. • Similarities and differences with income-driven repayment? • How should risk be shared among students, lenders, and colleges? • Colleges have more information on income-potential of various degrees. • Which contracts are optimal for financing education?
  • 25. Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion Conclusion • Model of federal student loans. • Three features: income-driven repayment, forgiveness, simple interest. • Complete solution for first two features. • Partial results including simple interest. • Minimum payments for large balances, maximum for small. • Intermediate cases more complex. • What are optimal contracts for education financing?
  • 26. Student Loans Modeling Student Loans Conclusion Thank You! Questions? https://epubs.siam.org/doi/10.1137/22M1505840 https://epubs.siam.org/doi/10.1137/21M1392267