Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

WE2.TO9.2.pptx

358 views

Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

WE2.TO9.2.pptx

  1. 1. ADAPTIVE MORPHOLOGICAL FILTERING FOR DEM GENERATION<br />KyoHyouk Kim and Jie Shan<br />Geomatics Engineering<br />School of Civil Engineering<br />Purdue University <br />July 27th 2011<br />IGARSS 2011 Annual Conference<br />
  2. 2. OUTLINE<br />Introduction<br />Previous Works<br />Proposed Approach<br />Tests<br />Summary<br />2/28<br />
  3. 3. OUTLINE<br />Introduction<br />LiDAR<br />Filtering<br />Previous Works<br />Proposed Approach<br />Tests<br />Summary<br />3/28<br />
  4. 4. INTRODUCTION<br />LiDAR (Light Detect And Ranging)<br />One of remote sensing technologies providing point clouds with highly accurate collections of (X,Y,Z) at observed points.<br />Vertical accuracy : 6 to 30 cm<br />Horizontal accuracy : 10 to 46 cm<br />Used as one of primary data sources to applications:<br />DEM (Digital Elevation Model)<br />Forest mapping <br />Building footprints & 3D building reconstruction<br />4/28<br />
  5. 5. INTRODUCTION<br />Filtering<br />Separation between ground points and nonground points.<br />Ground points : Digital Elevation Model (DEM).<br />Non-ground points : Building models, forest structure, canopy mapping<br />In nearly all applications, filtering should be done first.<br />Various filtering algorithms have been proposed.<br />Slope-based filters<br />Linear prediction filters<br />Clustering (or segmentation) filters<br />Morphological filters<br />5/28<br />
  6. 6. INTRODUCTION<br />Example<br />6/28<br />
  7. 7. OUTLINE<br />Introduction<br />Previous Works<br />General rule<br />Morphological filtering algorithm<br />Known issues & weaknesses<br />Proposed Approach<br />Tests<br />Summary<br />7/28<br />
  8. 8. PREVIOUS WORKS<br />General rule<br />What is ground surface ?<br />Ground surfaces are relatively smooth & continuous<br />Locally spanned through the lowest parts.<br />EX: discontinuous ground surface and negative blunders.<br />All filtering algorithms try to<br />Identify points on the continuous and smooth ground surface<br />Remove points lying on non-ground objects<br />Measures of discontinuity<br />Abrupt slope or elevation difference<br />8/28<br />
  9. 9. PREVIOUS WORKS<br /> Morphological filtering<br />Commonly used in the image processing fields to :<br />Remove noise<br />Enhance images<br />Extract features<br />Published papers for LiDAR filtering<br />Kilian, Halla, and Englich (1996), Kilian et al. (1996), Zhang et al. (2003), Zaksek and Pfeifer (2006), Zhang and Cui (2007), Chen et al. (2007,2009). <br />9/28<br />
  10. 10. PREVIOUS WORKS<br /> Principles<br />Morphological opening operation : Erosion followed by dilation<br />Erosion : <br />Dilation :<br />Objects with different size<br />Apply different window size <br />If terrain is not flat<br />use maximum slope<br />d0<br /><br />d<br />10/28<br />
  11. 11. PREVIOUS WORKS<br />Known issues & weaknesses<br />Parameters have a great impact on the filtering result<br />Slope : allowed minimum elevation difference<br />Window size : objects with various sizes<br />Small window : Can not remove larger buildings<br />Large window : Highly possible to flatten ground surface<br />No optimal set of parameters supporting various types of terrain<br />Require a priori information about the target area.<br />Require trial-and-error process to find the best set of parameters<br />11/28<br />
  12. 12. OUTLINE<br />Introduction<br />Previous Works<br />Proposed Approach<br />Adaptive morphological filtering<br />Tests<br />Summary<br />12/28<br />
  13. 13. PROPOSED APPROACH<br />Adaptive morphological filtering<br />Use of regular grid with grid size g ( average point spacing)<br />Cell with multiple points : point with the lowest elevation<br />Empty cell : elevation of the nearest point<br />Keeps the indices of original LiDAR points<br />1D (or 2D) Morphological erosion operation (W = 3).<br />Filtering is applied only to points of discontinuity iteratively.<br />Relevant parameters are adaptively adjusted in each iteration<br />13/28<br />
  14. 14. PROPOSED APPROACH<br />Use of 2D regular grid<br />14/28<br />
  15. 15. PROPOSED APPROACH<br />Discontinuity Measure<br />Identify points lying on the edge between ground and objects<br />Use of nominal value for thresholds (No fixed thresholds)<br />Ex: 50, 75 or 90 percentile<br />Threshold is determined before each iteration<br />Residual<br />Height difference<br />Slope<br />15/28<br />
  16. 16. PROPOSED APPROACH<br />Example<br />One LiDAR profile<br />Slope<br />Residual<br />16/28<br />
  17. 17. PROPOSED APPROACH<br />Workflow<br />For i=1 to # of rows (or # of columns)<br />Determine residuals (ri) of all points<br />Ifri> N percentile of r (N=50,75,90)<br />If hi - (New hi) > Hmin<br />hi = New hi<br />Until # of filtered<br /> points = 0<br />End<br />17/28<br />
  18. 18. PROPOSED APPROACH<br />Example<br />70th row<br /> - 50 percentile<br /> - Hmin = 1.0m<br />Purdue campus<br />18/28<br />
  19. 19. PROPOSED APPROACH<br />Refinement<br />Type I (omission) error : remove ground points mistakenly<br />Caused by (1) negative blunders and (2) discontinuous ground<br />Type II (commission) error : classify objects to ground points<br />Caused by (1) nonground points with smaller elevation than Hmin<br />19/28<br />
  20. 20. PROPOSED APPROACH<br />Example ( Type I error)<br />20/28<br />
  21. 21. PROPOSED APPROACH<br />Resolve Type I error<br />Identify continuous segments of ground points<br />Distance of any non-ground points to the line (Si(n) – Si+1(1))<br />Repeated until no more ground points are restored<br />d<br />21/28<br />
  22. 22. OUTLINE<br />Introduction<br />Previous Works<br />Proposed Approach<br />Tests<br />Summary of data sets<br />Evaluations<br />Summary<br />22/28<br />
  23. 23. INITIAL RESULTS<br />Test data sets<br /><ul><li>High relief (mixed slope)
  24. 24. Small step-wise features
  25. 25. Discontinuous surface
  26. 26. Almost flat
  27. 27. Buildings mixed with trees
  28. 28. High relief (mixed slope)
  29. 29. Dense vegetation</li></ul>23/28<br />23/26<br />
  30. 30. INITIAL RESULTS<br />Filtered ground surface (1)<br /><ul><li>Hmin= 1.5m
  31. 31. Residual threshold = 50 percentile</li></ul>24/28<br />
  32. 32. INITIAL RESULTS<br />Filtered ground surface (2)<br /><ul><li>Hmin = 1.0 m
  33. 33. Residual threshold = 50 percentile</li></ul>25/28<br />
  34. 34. INITIAL RESULTS<br />Filtered ground surface (3)<br /><ul><li>Hmin = 1.5 m
  35. 35. Residual threshold = 50 percentile</li></ul>26/28<br />
  36. 36. OUTLINE<br />Introduction<br />Previous Works<br />Proposed Approach<br />Tests<br />Summary<br />27/28<br />
  37. 37. SUMMARY<br />Adaptive morphological filtering<br />Minimize the effects of parameters<br />Filtering is applied only to points on the boundary iteratively<br />Residual is used as the measure id discontinuity<br />Residual threshold is adaptively adjusted with nominal value<br />Promising results from various terrain conditions, but :<br />Type I error is often significant in case of discontinuous terrain<br />Need more robust stopping criterion<br />28/28<br />

×