Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Beyond the Scanned Image: A Needs Assessment of Faculty Users of Digital Collections


Published on

Presentation given by Harriett Green and Angela Courtney at the Digital Humanities 2013 conference.

Published in: Education, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

Beyond the Scanned Image: A Needs Assessment of Faculty Users of Digital Collections

  1. 1. Harriett Green, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign | @greenharr Angela Courtney, Indiana University – Bloomington | @englishlitlib Nicki Saylor, Library of Congress American Folklife Center Digital Humanities 2013 July 18, 2013
  2. 2. • Council of Library and Information Resources, Scholarly Work in the Humanities and the Evolving Information Environment • Log Analysis of Internet Resources in the Arts and Humanities Project (LAIRAH) • Toolkit for the Impact of Digitised Scholarly Resources (TIDSR) • Research Portals in the Arts and Humanities (REPAH) • Ithaka S+R reports • See DH2013 conference abstract for further citations
  3. 3. Partner Institutions: • Australian National University • Indiana University • Northwestern University • Tufts University • University of California, Berkeley • University of Chicago • University of Illinois, Urbana- Champaign • University of Maryland • University of Oxford • University of Wisconsin, Madison Mission: “How can we advance arts and humanities research through the development of shared technology services?”
  4. 4. • Why and how do humanities scholars use digital collections in their research? • What do scholars need in the functionalities and features of digital collections in order for them to be useful in humanities research?
  5. 5. • Indiana University • Michigan State University • Northwestern University • Penn State University • University of Chicago • University of Illinois at Chicago • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign • University of Iowa • University of Maryland • University of Minnesota • University of Nebraska at Lincoln • University of Wisconsin–Madison
  6. 6. • Survey and interviews conducted at 15 research universities from fall 2011 through spring 2012 • Web-based survey of randomly sampled English and History faculty members • 17 in-person interviews of randomly sampled fine and performing arts faculty
  7. 7. • ―Topic modeling, Dunning's comparisons, mining word-frequency correlations, assessing changes in style and thematic content over time ‖ • ―I study the mass media, so I rely on databases of old television and radio recordings.‖ • ―I am a historian and I use digitized collections of newspapers, magazines, government reports and documents, legal cases, legal manuals and handbooks, books, etc.‖ • ―High definition images of papyrus as basis for textual reconstructions.‖
  8. 8. • Use of digital materials versus physical materials ―I use the "real" objects if possible. I use digital reproductions if I don't have access to the originals. Since I don't have access to many of the original objects and images I want to study, I would guess about half and half.‖
  9. 9. • Benefits of Original • Completeness of contents • Sensory experience • Integrate print and digital ―I still must and do consult originals, but for teaching I have always had to rely on surrogates, and for my research, the availability of databases particularly for periodicals, historical dictionaries, and other online primary and secondary sources generally has been an enormous boon.‖
  10. 10. • Benefits of Digital • Portability • Wide accessibility • Preservation ―I teach contemporary literature so no one expects me to assign a given writer’s drafts of a published novel. Why should it be any different when it comes to digital images of art that may be housed in distant museums or digitized manuscripts that may be too frail to sustain the wear and tear of hundreds of freshmen’s hands?‖
  11. 11. 0 36 36 20 7 Frequency of Use of Digital Materials Never Less than half Equal for print & digital mat. More than half Always
  12. 12. 100% 93% 58% 42% 39% 4% 0% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Texts Images Maps Video Audio Others None Types of Digital Materials Used
  13. 13. • ―links to related material or bibliographic resources‖ • ―metadata must include rigorous bibliographic information and stated principles, either explicitly derived from existing modern critical editions or stated as unique to this database.‖ • ―good word search capability allows me to find all instances of the use of a particular term in a given document collection or diary, narrow dates, search for names (and alternate names) of key individuals, etc. ‖ • ―capability to be read on multiple devices (e.g., iThing, laptop, desktop).‖ • ―The ability to annotate these texts in private and public environments, where I could keep stuff for myself or share it with others.‖ • ―The ability to conduct corpus wide inquiries is still severely limited. Search tools are good for finding needles in haystacks, terrible for extracting data for subsequent manipualtions
  14. 14. • ―Images must cooperate with both Powerpoint and Word.‖ • ―Ability to export in multiple formats (i.e. jpegs and higher resolution tifs)‖ • ―information on permissions and how to request them‖ • ―ability to have a folder of images in the collection to which I can return that contains all of the copyright and original publication material associated with the image‖ • ―viewing and zooming tools, color accuracy, ability to export, reliable metadata‖
  15. 15. • ―video ability to moderate sound and size‖ • ―ability to embed in other sites (I use my own websites for drafts of work in multi-media)‖ • ―ability to export and listen/view in another session‖ • ―Annotation tools‖ • ―detailed metadata, a time counter for audio and video, downloadable‖
  16. 16. • Areas to Improve • Searchability • More content • Annotation and editing tools • Current challenges • Poor interfaces and user design • Incomplete contents • Too much data?
  17. 17. • Phase 1 Workshops held in 2008-2009 • Qualitiative data from focus groups and workshops gathered and analyzed by Quinn Dombrowski, Scholarly Practices in the Humanities: Directions, Trends and Opportunities internal report • Gathered data from workshop discussion of scholarly research practices • Comparative analysis of workshop data and survey data – How do we map expressed scholarly practices to expressed scholarly needs?
  18. 18. Searchability Gathering/Foraging Synthesizing/Filtering Tools for visualizing relationships Contextualizing Conceptualizing, Refining, Critiquing Research Documentation Tools Documenting Methods Metadata Managing Data Annotation Tools Annotating/Documenting Modeling/Visualizing Teaching/Research Interoperability Sharing/Publishing Funding Collaborating Citation/credit/peer-review
  19. 19. • ―The trick is that the digital collection has to be sufficiently large (pulling from multiple sources) for it to be useful and often it would be preferable for the collection to have the complete run of a magazine so that I can compare media from different decades.‖ • ―The ability to control your collection, set up your own library and so on and go deeper and deeper, adding tags, etc. Where it’s less of a skill and more of an expectation. ―Personalization of text that in print is crucial.‖ That’s a big gap.‖ • ―Better interfaces that allow more flexibility and manipulation of digital images, access to geographic systems and maps to spatialize knowledge in ways that cannot be done with print material.‖ • Participatory tagging and other forms of shared knowledge building.
  20. 20. • ―The challenges are (a) finding resources to make high- quality digital collections, (b) making those digital collections usable and useful, which requires (c) training humanists to be deep designers of technologies.‖ • ―I theorize models of historiographic placement, searching, and locatability; so I also consider the various functionality of digital tools.‖ • ―The easier objects are to repurpose, remix, and reuse the better.‖
  21. 21. CLIR, The Idea of Order: Transforming Research Collections for 21st Century Scholarship ―Enabling anything like seamless access to the cultural record will require developing tools to navigate among vast catalogs of born-digital and digitized materials, as well as the records of physical materials.‖—ACLS, Our Cultural Commonwealth report (2006)
  22. 22. Harriett E. Green University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign | @greenharr Angela Courtney Indiana University | @englishlitlib Nicki Saylor