Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Super Insulated Buildings Enclosures in the Pacific Northwest


Published on

Presentation from 2013 SEABEC Conference on Super Insulated Building Enclosures - Balancing Energy, Durability and Economics in the Pacific Northwest

Published in: Technology, Business
  • There are over 16,000 woodworking plans that comes with step-by-step instructions and detailed photos, Click here to take a look ■■■
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • The #1 Woodworking Resource With Over 16,000 Plans, Download 50 FREE Plans... ➤➤
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • The #1 Woodworking Resource With Over 16,000 Plans, Download 50 FREE Plans... ◆◆◆
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • The #1 Woodworking Resource With Over 16,000 Plans, Download 50 FREE Plans... ▲▲▲
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here

Super Insulated Buildings Enclosures in the Pacific Northwest

  1. 1. May 21, 2013 – SEABEC - Zen and the Art of Building Enclosure Design Super Insulated Building Enclosures – Balancing Energy, Durability, and Economics in the Pacific Northwest Graham Finch, MASc, P.Eng RDH Building Sciences Inc. Vancouver, BC/Seattle, WA
  2. 2. Presentation Outline What are “Super-Insulated” buildings and what are the drivers? Thermal bridging – problems and solutions Designing of highly insulated walls – insulation placement & durability considerations Super-Insulated wood- frame building enclosure design guide
  3. 3. Energy codes outline minimum thermal performance criteria based on climate zone ASHRAE 90.1, IECC – US WSEC 2012, SEC 2012– Washington State & City of Seattle OEESC 2010 – Oregon State Energy codes in Pacific Northwest are some of most stringent but are also the best implemented in North America Building enclosure (R-value/U-values) very important part of compliance Effective R-values considered From Energy Codes to Super Insulation
  4. 4. Most Energy Codes now consider effective R-values Nominal R-values = Rated R-values of insulation which do not include impacts of how they are installed For example R-20 batt insulation or R-10 foam insulation Effective R-values include impacts of insulation installation and thermal bridges For example nominal R-20 batts within steel studs becoming ~R-9 effective, or in wood studs ~R-15 effective Effective R-values
  5. 5. In Pacific Northwest - minimum energy code R-value targets generally in range of: R-15 to R-25 effective for walls R-25 to R-50 effective for roofs R-2 to R-4 for windows Green or more energy efficient building programs including Passive House - R-value targets in range of: R-30 to R-50+ effective for walls R-40 to R-60+ effective for roofs R-6+ for windows Other drivers – comfort, passive design, mold-free What does Super Insulation mean? From Energy Codes to Super-Insulation
  6. 6. Super Insulated? 12” EPS insulation boards (blocks?) R-54
  7. 7. Super Insulated? 8” XPS insulation below grade R-40 6” mineral fiber (stainless brick ties) over insulated 2x6 wood frame ~R-38
  8. 8. Good to have super insulated walls and roofs – but what about thermal bridges and poorly insulated windows? Super Insulated?
  9. 9. Thermal bridging occurs when a more conductive material (e.g. metal, concrete, wood etc.) bypasses a less conductive material (insulation) Minimizing thermal bridging is key to energy code compliance and an energy efficient building Balance of good window performance and appropriate window to wall ratio Use of exterior continuous insulation with thermally improved cladding attachments Minimizing the big thermal bridges Energy codes have historically focused on assembly R-values – however recently more attention is being placed on R-values of interfaces and details Also impacts comfort, condensation, and mold Energy Codes and Thermal Bridging – A Balancing Act
  10. 10. Whole building airtightness testing requirements in Seattle and Washington State building codes are driving improvements in energy efficiency Various solutions to achieve higher degrees of airtightness Target of 0.40 cfm/ft2 at 75 Pa is frequently being met – range of 0.10 to 0.20 cfm/ft2 possible with some solutions Building and Energy Codes and Airtightness
  11. 11. Windows significantly influence overall building enclosure performance Think about what R-3 windows do within an R-20 wall – where is the balance? Tend to see higher window to wall ratios in multi-family and commercial buildings 40% to 70%+ is common vs 15% to 30% in homes Optimized area and tuned SHGC, windows can have a positive impact (passive design strategies) Challenges to Energy Efficiency – Windows
  12. 12. Impact of Windows on Whole Building R-values
  13. 13. Concrete balconies, eyebrows and exposed slab edges are one of the most significant thermal bridges Essentially ~R-1 component This reduce overall effective R-value of the whole wall area by 40 to 60% (for something that is just a few % of the overall wall area) Adding insulation to surrounding walls often can’t make up for the loss associated with the detail Challenges to Energy Efficiency – Balcony & Exposed Slabs
  14. 14. Example of slab/balcony impact: Slab edge typically occupies ~8% of the gross wall area (8” slab in 8’8” high wall) Balconies may occupy 1-2% of the gross wall area Window to wall ratio affects opaque wall area Impact of Concrete Balconies and Exposed Slab Edges Exposed Slab Edge Percentage for Different WWR 100% wall: 0% windows 60% wall: 40% windows 50% wall: 50% windows 40% wall: 60% windows 20% wall: 80% windows 8” slab, 8’ floor to ceiling 7.7% 12.8% 15.4% 19.2% 38.5% Exposed Slab Edge Percentage for Different WWR 100% wall: 0% windows 60% wall: 40% windows 50% wall: 50% windows 40% wall: 60% windows 20% wall: 80% windows 8” slab, 8’ floor to ceiling 7.7% 12.8% 15.4% 19.2% 38.5%
  15. 15. Cast-in thermal breaks Standard in Europe – becoming more available in North America Pre-cast and discretely attached concrete balconies (bolt on) Solutions for Balconies
  16. 16. Exterior insulation is only as good as the cladding attachment strategy How to achieve continuous insulation performance? Flashings and other details also important Challenges to Energy Efficiency – Cladding Attachment
  17. 17. Many Possible Strategies – Wide Range of Performance Cladding Attachment through Exterior Insulation
  18. 18. Effective R-values of Various Cladding Attachments GoodBadUgly
  19. 19. Strategies: Thermally Improved Cladding Attachments
  20. 20. Strategies Wood-frame: Screws through Exterior Insulation Longer cladding Fasteners directly through rigid insulation (up to 2” for light claddings) Long screws through vertical strapping and rigid insulation creates truss (8”+) – short cladding fasteners into vertical strapping Rigid shear block type connection through insulation, cladding to vertical strapping
  21. 21. Wide range of R-values marketed with polyisocyanurate (polyiso) and closed-cell (2 pcf) sprayfoam insulation Polyiso – reports of R-5 up to R-7.5 Closed cell sprayfoam – reports of R-5 to 6.5 Both influenced by age (off-gassing of blowing gases, replaced with air makes worse with time) R-value changes with temperature Higher density equals lower R-values This isn’t new science or information Real long-term thermal resistance (LTTR) values for both products in the R-4.5 to R-5.5 range when you need them Challenges to True Energy Efficiency – R-value Claims
  22. 22. Real Insulation R-values – Old Science From: Canadian Building Digest #149, 1972 VariousN.A.PolyisoSamples &Ages-NamesRemoved Olderandhigherdensity winter summer Room Temperature
  23. 23. Wide range of aluminum foil radiant barrier products on market (paints too) Varying marketing claims – anything from R-1 all the way up to R-15+ Realistically may achieve R-1 to R-3 (very still air) if product faces a dead air cavity (ref. testing by many institutes) Be very wary of false claims & suspicious test results Why care? Often cheaper to use real insulation Challenges to True Energy Efficiency – To Good to be True!
  24. 24. Wood-framed buildings generally provide good R-values, but… Taller wood-frame buildings – higher stud framing factors Solid wood buildings – Cross Laminated Timber (CLT) Where to insulate & air-seal - what assemblies to use? New and Upcoming Challenges to Energy Efficiency?
  25. 25. Trend towards more highly insulated building enclosures due to higher energy code targets and uptake of passive design strategies Often means new enclosure assemblies (mainly walls) and construction techniques Higher R-value windows (triple glazing and less conductive window frames) Reduction of thermal bridging, more structural analysis of façade components, balconies etc. Super insulation achieved with proper balance! Long-term performance of new assemblies (particularly wood frame) can be a challenge in our wet environment Moving Towards Super Insulated Enclosures
  26. 26. Thermal insulation continuity & effectiveness – energy code driven Airflow control/airtightness – energy code and building code driven Control of condensation and vapor diffusion – building code driven Control of exterior moisture/rainwater & detailing – building code driven More insulation = less heat flow to dry out moisture Amount, type and placement of insulations matters Greater need to more robust and better detailed assemblies Potentially more sensitive to vapor, air & moisture issues Energy Efficient Building Enclosure Design Fundamentals
  27. 27. What about the Pacific Northwest
  28. 28. Continue to repair moisture damaged buildings in the Pacific Northwest Not Super Insulated.. Lower Risk But Still Failed
  29. 29. Definitely Not Super Insulated.. But Still Failed
  30. 30. “Super Insulated” Glazing Systems .. Failed Systemic Failure of proprietary triple glazing units
  31. 31. Rainwater penetration causes most problems –poor details (e.g. lack of, poorly implemented, bad materials) Air leakage condensation can cause problems Vapor diffusion contributes but doesn’t cause most problems – unless within a sensitive assembly Many windows leak and sub-sill drainage and flashings are critical, other details and interfaces also important Insulation inboard of structural elements decreases temperatures which increases risk for moisture damage Durability of building materials is very important Watch over-use of impermeable materials in wet locations Drained & ventilated rainscreen walls & details work well Unproven materials/systems can be risky What Have We Learned from Past Enclosure Failures?
  32. 32. Insulation Placement and Assembly Design Considerations Interior Insulation Exterior Insulation Split Insulation
  33. 33. Getting to Higher R-values – Placement of Insulation Baseline 2x6 w/ R-22 batts = R-16 effective Exterior Insulation – R-20 to R-40+ effective • Constraints: cladding attachment, wall thickness • Good for wood/steel/concrete Deep/Double Stud– R-20 to R-40+ effective • Constraints wall thickness • Good for wood, wasted for steel Split Insulation– R-20 to R-40+ effective • Constraints: cladding attachment • Good for wood, palatable for steel New vs Retrofit Considerations
  34. 34. Insulation outboard of structure and control layers (air/vapor/water) Thermal mass at interior where useful Cladding attachment biggest source of thermal loss/bridging Excellent performance in all climate zones – But is not the panacea, can still mess it up Exterior Insulated Walls Steel Stud Concrete Heavy Timber (CLT)
  35. 35. Key Considerations: Cladding attachment Wall thickness Heat Control: Exterior insulation (any type) Air Control: Membrane on exterior of structure Vapor Control: Membrane on exterior of structure Water Control: Rainscreen cladding, membrane on exterior of structure, surface of insulation Key Considerations - Exterior Insulation Assemblies
  36. 36. Key Considerations - Split Insulation Assemblies Key Considerations: Exterior insulation type Cladding attachment Sequencing & detailing Heat Control: Exterior and stud space Insulation (designed) Air Control: House-wrap adhered/sheet/liquid membrane on sheathing, sealants/tapes etc. Often vapor permeable Vapor Control: Poly or VB paint at interior, plywood/OSB sheathing Water Control: Rainscreen cladding, WRB membrane, surface of insulation
  37. 37. Split Insulation Assemblies – Exterior Insulation Selection Rigid exterior foam insulations (XPS, EPS, Polyiso, closed cell SPF) are vapor impermeable (in thicknesses, 2”+) Is the vapor barrier on the wrong side? Does the wall have two vapor barriers? How much insulation should be put outside of the sheathing? – More is always better, but is there room? Cost? Semi-rigid or rigid mineral or glass fiber insulations are vapor permeable and address these concerns Vapor permeance properties of sheathing membrane (WRB)/air-barrier is also important
  38. 38. Split Insulation and Moisture Risk Assessment Insulation Ratio Here is over 2/3 to the exterior of the sheathing Careful with lower ratios with foam
  39. 39. R-value design target up to R-25 for steel framed wall assembly. Energy modeling showed could trade-off a bit but no lower than R-18.2 (code) 6” steel stud frame wall structure (supported outboard of slab edge, and perimeter beams) Expectation to be cost effective, buildable and minimize wall thickness Tasked with the evaluation of a number of potential options Lack of performance from standard practices helped innovate a new solution Case Study: Bullitt Center – Split Insulation Wall Assembly
  40. 40. Bullitt Center – Exterior Wall Assembly Evaluation Baseline: R-19 batts within 2x6 steel stud with exposed slab edges = R- 6.4 effective Considered 2x8 and 2x10 studs - still less than R-8 Target R-value up to R-25 Vertical Z-Girts (16” oc) 5” (R-20) exterior insulation plus R-19 batts within 2x6 steel stud = R-11.0 effective Horiz. Z-Girts (24” oc) 5” (R-20) exterior insulation plus R-19 batts within 2x6 steel stud = R-14.1 effective Crossing Z-girts also evaluated <R-16 effective Intermittent Metal Clips 5” (R-20) exterior insulation plus R-19 batts within 2x6 steel stud = R-17.1 effective up to R-21 with some modifications
  41. 41. The Need to Go Higher – Reduce the Thermal Bridging
  42. 42. The Need to Go Higher – Reduce the Thermal Bridging Intermittent Fiberglass Spacers, 3½” to 6” (R-14 to R-24) exterior insulation = R-19.1 to R-26.3 + effective
  43. 43. Metal panel 1” horizontal metal hat tracks 3 ½” semi-rigid mineral fiber (R-14.7) between 3 ½” fiberglass clips Fluid applied vapor permeable WRB/Air barrier on gypsum sheathing 6” mineral fiber batts (R-19) between 6” steel studs Gypsum drywall Supported outboard slab edge (reduce thermal bridging) Effective R-value R-26.6 Bullitt Center – Exterior Wall Assembly
  44. 44. Double 2x4/2x6 stud, single deep 2x10, 2x12, I-Joist etc. Common wood-frame wall assembly in many passive houses (and prefabricated highly insulated walls) Often add interior service wall – greater control over airtightness Inherently at a higher risk for damage if sheathing gets wet (rainwater, air leakage, vapor diffusion) – due to more interior insulation Double/Deep Stud Insulated Walls
  45. 45. Key Considerations – Double Stud/Deep Stud Key Considerations: Air-sealing Rainwater management/detailing Heat Control: Double stud cavity fill insulation(s) – dense-pack cellulose, fiberglass, sprayfoam Air Control: House-wrap/membrane on sheathing, poly, airtight drywall on interior, OSB/plywood at interior, tapes, sealants, sprayfoam. Airtightness on both sides good Vapor Control: Poly, VB paint or OSB/plywood at interior Water Control: Rainscreen cladding, WRB at house-wrap/membrane, flashings etc.
  46. 46. Deep/Double Stud and Moisture Risk Assessment
  47. 47. Guide to the Design of Energy Efficient Building Enclosures – for Wood Multi-Unit Residential Buildings Provides design and detailing guidance for highly insulated wood-frame wall & roof assemblies Contains North American energy code guidance, building science fundamentals Insulation placement, air barrier systems, cladding attachment Available as a free download direct from FP Innovations (google the title above) Further Guidance on Highly Insulated Walls & Details
  48. 48. Deep energy retrofit of 1980s vintage concrete frame multi-unit residential building – owners decision to renew aesthetic (old concrete, leaky windows) Original overall effective R-value R-2.8 Exterior insulate and over-clad existing exposed concrete walls (R-18 eff.) Install new triple glazed fiberglass frame windows (R-6 eff.) – triple glazing incremental upgrade <5 year payback Retrofitted effective R-9.1 (super- insulated for a building of this type) 55% reduction in air leakage measured Enclosure improvements 20% overall savings (87% space-heating) Actual savings being monitored – seeing higher than predicted savings Final Thoughts – Super-Insulation Retrofit Case Study
  49. 49. Super-Insulated building enclosures require careful design and detailing to ensure durability Balancing materials, cost, and detailing considerations Cladding attachment detailing – minimize loss of R-value of exterior insulation Shifting insulation to the outside the structure improves performance and durability – balance is often cost Super-Insulated buildings require balancing thermal performance of all components & airtightness No point super-insulating walls/roofs if you have large thermal bridges or poor performing windows - address the weakest links first Opportunities for both new and existing buildings Final Thoughts – “The Art and Balance”
  50. 50. Questions Graham Finch – Highly Insulated Wood-frame Enclosure Guide – FP Innovations