Comparing rock and fossil records in the deep sea


Published on

Published in: Education, Business, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • The history of biodiversity –based on counts of fossils sampled from the rock record and for most groups biodiversity patterns have been based on the fossil record available from land-based outcrops.
  • But there is a problem – a worrisome correlation exists between sampled diversity and the rock record driven by large transgression-regression cycles. As we have heard from Shanan this could be biological as much as sampling artefact - so what we need is another system where the rock record is very different so that we can resolve how important rock sampling is. Such a record exists! – in the deep-sea.
  • For microfossils such as coccolithophorids we have access to both a deep-sea record and a land-based record which gives us two biodiversity estimates under two different rock records which allows us to explore the relationship between rock & fossil records and pinpoint how much the rock record influences biodiversity curves. Today I’m going to concentrate on the deep sea
  • Comparing rock and fossil records in the deep sea

    1. 1. Comparing rock and fossil records in the deep seaGraeme T. Lloyd, Andrew B. Smith and Jeremy R. Young
    2. 2. Fossil record is our only record of the diversification of life
    3. 3. Diversity correlates with rock record on landPeters and Foote 2001 Smith and McGowan 2007
    4. 4. An alternative record• Calcareous microfossils such as coccolithophores have land-based and deep sea records• i.e., two diversity records and two rock records• What is the relationship between these records?• How much does the rock record influence diversity patterns?
    5. 5. The database• Study groups are Coccolithophores and planktic Foraminifera• Novel compilation from North Atlantic• Compiled from 40 years ODP/DSDP data• 64,077+ occs from 20,723+ samples• High temporal resolution (biozones)
    6. 6. Deep sea species richness
    7. 7. Deep sea genus richness
    8. 8. Deep sea rock record
    9. 9. Correlation tests• First both time series were log-transformed• Long term test: – Simple correlation• Short term tests: – First differences (absolute) – Moving average differences (relative to long term trend)• Degree (rho) and significance (p) of correlations determined using Spearman rank
    10. 10. Deep sea long-term correlation
    11. 11. Deep sea short-term correlation I
    12. 12. Deep sea short-term correlation I
    13. 13. Deep sea short-term correlation II
    14. 14. Deep sea short-term correlation II
    15. 15. Modeling
    16. 16. Modeling results
    17. 17. Modeling results
    18. 18. Subsampling
    19. 19. Subsampling results
    20. 20. Conclusions• Deep sea diversity curve largely explicable by sampling• Apparent rise in nannofossil diversity to present strongly associated with rise in sampling
    21. 21. The other side of the story• What about the land-based record for the same groups?• Sampling strategy based on distribution charts from primary literature• Rock record measure is number of localities
    22. 22. Two rock records
    23. 23. Two fossil records
    24. 24. Summary• Both land and sea have measurable rock biases that follow different trajectories over geological time• Will allow a clear and explicit test of how important a role these play in shaping our fossil record