[Group 06] Imperial War Museum

1,257 views

Published on

0 Comments
3 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,257
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
412
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
3
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Copy strategic objectives from brief
  • Important to not focus on design, but incorporate research on existing data on annual data etc…
  • Important to not focus on design, but incorporate research on existing data on annual data etc…
  • Use of this new research will have tot do with work programs, combination of old and modern styles of building, and opening of new exhibition space
  • Very important for our public to understand our designs were selected based on objective features, and a quantitative model was introduced for such a process
  • My suggestion is to have a recap of the qualitative and quantitative features that we feel are essential to this project. This will show the other groups that although we have been creative and wacky, we have also been concerned with real data, constraints and clear objectives.
  • [Group 06] Imperial War Museum

    1. 1. Project Introduction IBriefIWM
    2. 2. Project Introduction IIStrategic Objectives→ AUDIENCE CENTRED→ LONG TERM IMPACT→ CONTINUOUS EVOLUTION→ HIGH PROFILE→ EFFICIENT AND EFFECTIVE
    3. 3. Site Research ICurrent use~ 40% Exhibition and Gallery space~ 30% Unusable space~ 1% Commercial space
    4. 4. Site Research IIVisitor DataMuseum occupancy for peak hour was over 1,000 people (Buro Happold)
    5. 5. Case Study ICanadian War Museum
    6. 6. Case Study IINational Army Museum
    7. 7. Case Study IIIParis Army Museum
    8. 8. Case Study IVNatural History Museum
    9. 9. Case Study VClient Suggestions→ Jewish Museum Berlin→ Newseum, Washington DC→ National Museum of Scotland
    10. 10. Initial Idea IMasterplan
    11. 11. Initial Idea IIThe GalleryExisting Structure Proposed Structure
    12. 12. Initial Idea IIICross Bridges
    13. 13. Initial Idea IVThe Light Project
    14. 14. Initial Idea VOverhang
    15. 15. Critical Session IEvaluation HeadingsValuePlanningRiskProgrammeVisualImpactOutreachStructuralFeasibilitySustainabilityUserExperienceTOTALSCOREStrength ofProject(if planning risk =0)Weighting 3 1 2 3 3 1 2 3 171Light Project 7 1 5 5 5 6 4 7 97The Gallery 8 1 3 5 5 6 5 6 95Cross Bridges 8 1 4 8 7 7 6 8 121Atrium Spiral 5 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/Atop downstructureThe Bunker 8 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A clear routeOverhang 7 1 8 9 7 8 7 5 123Side Extension 7 1 8 6 5 8 6 6 109Towers 8 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A noveltyParkDevelopment7 1 9 8 9 8 5 8 133Themed Park 9 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A high revenueBasementEntrance8 1 6 9 7 7 7 8 130CriteriaProject
    16. 16. Design Selection IThe Gallery
    17. 17. Design Selection IIThe Extended Experience
    18. 18. Objectives IShort TermProject I Team Project II Team Park Development TeamFilippo Boselli Tamara Brooks Aparna MathurManuel David Abreu Nathan Christie Guillaume VallaHaziq Ramli Jack Pearson
    19. 19. Objectives IILong term→Will – Value→ Filippo – Structural Feasibility→ Manuel – Planning Risk→ Tamara – User Experience→ Nathan – Programme→ Jack – Sustainability→ Haziq – Visual Impact→ Aparna - Outreach
    20. 20. Objectives IIIFinal ResultObjectives by 2020:→ Increase exhibition space by 50%→ Increase commercial space to 5% of overall area→ Average increase of 3% per annum in visits

    ×