Industrial defined problem ro treatment


Published on

This is problem faced by desalination plant in india by big company "ION EXCHANGE" the ro (reverse Osmosis) process rejected water contains salts which can be removed and used by VMD ..

Published in: Education
1 Comment
  • Dear Sir/Madam,.
    Please send us the details of recovery systems available for RO REJECT recovery.
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Industrial defined problem ro treatment

  2. 2. INTRODUCTION The given IDP Problem is Typically the TDS of RO- Reject water is about 5-6% comprises the salt of sodium chloride, sodium sulphate (5%), and salts of calcium and magnesium are 0.1%. It is very much difficult to discharge in environment for zero liquid discharge systems. Currently available methods like thermal evaporation are highly cost intensive. Similarly, solar evaporation ponds are also not feasible due to their huge area requirement.
  3. 3. INTRODUCTION SUGGESTED SOLUTION : Vacuum Membrane Distillation (VMD) Membrane Distillation is a emerging technology for desalination . It differs from other technologies because the driving force is the difference in the vapor pressure of water across the membrane rather than the total pressure. Optimization of desalination can be done effectively by VMD PROCESS
  4. 4. INTRODUCTION In VMD, the feed solution is directly in the contact of membrane surface and is kept at lower pressure than the minimum entry pressure LEP- Lower Entry Pressure at the other side of the membrane, the permeate pressure is often mentioned below the equilibrium vapor pressure by a vacuum pump. The vapors permeated is taken out by Vacuum and is condensed in an external condenser The total pressure difference between the two sides of membrane causes convective mass flow through the pores that contribute to the total mass transfer of VMD
  5. 5. INTRODUCTION There is only diffusive flux of volatile component within the membrane pore therefore mass flux of VMD generally larger than that of other membrane distillation configuration. Another advantage of VMD comes from the negligible heat conduction through membrane. studies the sensitivity of the mass flux to the process operating parameters including downstream pressure, feed temperature, feed flow rate, and membrane permeability.
  6. 6. INTRODUCTION Salts can b recovered from this process to maximum extent and this process can lead to ZERO DICHARGE which is need for this decade.
  8. 8. AFFECTING FACTORS IN VMD Rejection rate: Rejection rate was separation performance parameter of nonvolatile solute water solutions. Due to hydrophobicity of distillation membrane, its rejection rate was higher than that of other membrane separation. Its affecting factors are mainly two as follows: one is pore size, and 0.2-1.0μm pore size is usually considered to be proper, and 0.2- 0.4μm is used much. Two is that pressure difference of membrane two sides could not exceed the pressure when liquids entered into membrane pore. Furthermore, rejection rate was related to solute concentration in the feeding system, feed flow rate and so on.
  9. 9. AFFECTING FACTORS IN VMD Temperature: temperature was the main factor affecting permeation flux. For DCMD, enhancing the temperature of solutions in hot procedure side or temperature difference between two sides, could result in significant increment of water flux, but not in a linear relationship. Vapour pressure deficit: permeation flux increased with the increasing of vapour pressure deficit between both membrane sides, and a linear relationship was obtained. Feed concentration: with the increasing of feed concentration, flux of nonvolatile solute water solutions decreased, while that of volatile increased.
  10. 10. AFFECTING FACTORS IN VMD Feed flow rate: Increasing feed flow or cooling water flow could result in flux increment. Distillation time: due to the process of distillation, membrane pore infiltration resulted in the reflux from the permeation side stream to feed, and membrane pollution caused the reduction of flux. Therefore, with the increasing of distillation time, flux reduction occurred. Membrane material and structure: hydrophobic microporous membrane was used in MD, and structure parameters affecting water flux were mainly as follows: pore size, porosity and membrane thickness.
  11. 11. THERMAL EFFICIENCY MD accompanied phase transition with heat energy consumption, and thermal efficiency affected directly its practical application. Thermal efficiency was an important factor which determined whether MD was competitive. Currently, thermal efficiency of MD was rather low(30% or so), which was one of the key problems hindering its large scale industrial application. If pore size and porosity was larger, diffusion coefficient of steam in membrane pore was higher, and membrane thermal conductivity was lower. Variation of membrane thickness would affect the temperature of membrane surface, and thus have an indirect impact on evaporation efficiency. Taken together, thermal efficiency was close associated with membrane parameters, and therefore, it could be enhanced by ameliorating membrane parameters.
  12. 12. APPROACHES TO ENHANCE VMD PERFORMANCE Add salt to feed solutions:For recovering volatile solutes in VMD process, salts could be added to feed solutions to reduce water vapour pressure and thus enhance the permeation flux of volatile components. Select proper operation conditions: Cold procedure side pressure played an critical role in membrane separation performance. With the decreasing of vacuum in cold procedure side, cold procedure side pressure augmented, and membrane flux and rejection rate all decreased. Consequently, when such pressure was larger than vapour critical pressure in membrane surface, decreasing such pressure would be beneficial to enhance membrane rejection rate and flux. Enhancing temperature could lower viscosity of fluid, reduce liquid membrane drag and thus increase mass transfer coefficient
  13. 13. APPROACHES TO ENHANCE VMD PERFORMANCE For nonvolatile components, with the increment of feed concentration, membrane flux lowered, because with the increasing of feed concentration, water saturated vapour pressure decreased, and separation process impetus lowered,which was not good for separation Operation . It has been investigated that total heat and mass transfer coefficient in two operation manners in the experiment of desalination by water solutions, namely inside out and outside in, and speculated that outside in manner was of more industrial production values.
  14. 14. APPROACHES TO ENHANCE VMD PERFORMANCE Ameliorate membrane performance: Hydrophobicity is primary for membrane materials and microporous membrane during VMD process. Materials are more hydrophobic, performance of materials used for VMD is better; Membrane pore is another cardinal factor affecting flux and rejection rate during MD process. Increasing pore size and porosity would be beneficial to the increment of flux. Polyethylene membrane with larger micropore diameter and higher porosity had quite high permeation flux under the same operation condition.
  15. 15. APPROACHES TO ENHANCE VMD PERFORMANCEMembrane loading density also affected VMDperformance ; It has found that pressure differencebetween both membrane sides was large whenmembrane loading density was quite low, and thussuch difference re.sulted in large permeation flux.
  16. 16. RESEARCH PROSPECTS FOR VMD Compared to other MD processes, operation temperature of VMD process could be lower, and at the same temperature, its flux would be larger. VMD could be convenient to utilize cheap heat sources such as solar energy, geothermal energy, waste heat and so on. Therefore, in combination with such cheap energy, VMD would have greater advantage in water treatment. For MD was a process of phase tansition, utilization of heat energy could reduce due to latent heat of vaporization..
  17. 17. RESEARCH PROSPECTS FOR VMDTo design proper energy recovery facilities would be ofgreat practical values in energy saving. VMD is a newmembrane separation technology, and its correspondingapplication research have obtained excellent achievements,which showed its promising application prospects. Webelieved that VMD would attain better application in watertreatment and bring greater impetus for substantialdevelopment along with the development of membranematerial and deep amelioration of process mechanism.
  18. 18. RESEARCH PROSPECTS FOR VMD ECONOMIC PROSPECT need to be checked and optimize according to the quantity of water to be treated , membrane selection, condenser design , control system and vacuum producing equipments.
  19. 19. REFERENCES Parametric Sensitivity Analysis of Vacuum Membrane Distillation for Desalination Process BY Sushant Upadhyaya*, Kailash Singh, S.P. Chaurasia, Madhu Agarwal, Rajeev Kumar Dohare Application of Vacuum Membrane Distillation in Water Treatment Yajing Li & Kunpeng Tian School of science, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin 300160, China. Coulson and Richardson’s CHEMICAL ENGINEERING VOLUME 2 FIFTH EDITION.
  20. 20. THANK YOU!!!!
  21. 21. QUESTIONS????