Mapping Institutional Requirements to ePortfolio Product Offerings

440 views

Published on

Presentation given by Gail Matthews-DeNatale and David Marble to the 2010 Northeast AAEEBL conference on authentic assessment and evidence-based learning

Published in: Education, Business, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
440
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
5
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Mapping Institutional Requirements to ePortfolio Product Offerings

  1. 1. 1<br />Mapping Institutional Requirements to ePortfolio Product Offerings<br />6/17/09<br />David Marble and Gail Mathews DeNatale<br />www.aaeebl.org<br />March 18, 2011 <br />AAEEBL Northeast Conference - JWU<br />1<br />
  2. 2. Agenda<br />Broad Strokes<br />Pedagogical Considerations<br />Gail Matthews-DeNatale<br />Drilling Down<br />Aligning Technology with Pedagogy<br />David Marble<br />
  3. 3. Truths Beget Questions<br />The institution’s software selection process can make or destroy chances of successful adoption.<br />What’s your motivation and process?<br />http://www.flickr.com/photos/ush/2453957729<br />
  4. 4. Truths Beget Questions<br />You can’t have it all. Those who focus will reap the greatest benefits.<br />What’s the primary centricity and purpose? Who is it for? How will it be used? <br />http://www.flickr.com/photos/dominik99/1403329318<br />
  5. 5. Truths Beget Questions<br />Assumptions about “teaching and learning” are embedded in software<br />What is your institution’s philosophy of education?<br />http://www.flickr.com/photos/duaneschoon/4530185934<br />
  6. 6. 3/16/2011<br />http://www.aaeebl.org<br />6<br />Expectations<br />Use Cases<br />Product<br />Developer<br /><ul><li>Actual Pedagogy
  7. 7. Acceptance
  8. 8. Resistance
  9. 9. Actual Use
  10. 10. Long term viability
  11. 11. Strengths
  12. 12. Weaknesses
  13. 13. Feature set
  14. 14. Delivery model
  15. 15. Idea of Pedagogy
  16. 16. Company heritage
  17. 17. Competitive space
  18. 18. Profitability</li></li></ul><li>3/16/2011<br />http://www.aaeebl.org<br />7<br />Technology<br />
  19. 19. Orchestration<br />3/16/2011<br />http://www.aaeebl.org<br />8<br /><ul><li>Creative Freedom
  20. 20. Audio, video
  21. 21. Intuitive
  22. 22. Sticky (My Page)
  23. 23. Templates
  24. 24. Multiple Identities
  25. 25. Social
  26. 26. Academic
  27. 27. Professional
  28. 28. Holistic?
  29. 29. Co Curricular
  30. 30. Longitudinal</li></li></ul><li>Evidence<br />3/16/2011<br />http://www.aaeebl.org<br />9<br /><ul><li>Artifacts
  31. 31. Assignments
  32. 32. Reflection
  33. 33. Tagging
  34. 34. Semantic
  35. 35. Analysis
  36. 36. Automation
  37. 37. Outcomes
  38. 38. Maps
  39. 39. Reporting
  40. 40. Templates</li></li></ul><li>Reflective Practice<br />3/16/2011<br />http://www.aaeebl.org<br />10<br /><ul><li>Interface
  41. 41. Capture
  42. 42. Tagging
  43. 43. Lexicon
  44. 44. Retrieval
  45. 45. Reports
  46. 46. Collaboration
  47. 47. Social Pedagogy</li></li></ul><li>Social Media<br />The Social Media explosion has revolutionized the communication landscape<br />How can the ePortfolio adapt and take advantage of this change?<br />How can Social Media technology be applied to the pedagogy of the classroom?<br />Is this a vehicle for the incorporation of reflection in the ePortfolio process?<br />Can conversations be tagged, categorized, captured?<br />Some companies are specializing in this space.<br />Look for pre-integrations and adaptation flexibility<br />LMS, SIS, etc…<br />3/16/2011<br />AAEEBL.org<br />
  48. 48. Assessment and Evaluation<br />3/16/2011<br />http://www.aaeebl.org<br />12<br /><ul><li>Rubrics
  49. 49. Samples
  50. 50. Custom
  51. 51. Audience
  52. 52. Student (Self)
  53. 53. Faculty
  54. 54. Administration
  55. 55. Accreditation
  56. 56. Reports
  57. 57. Automation
  58. 58. Intuitive Interface</li></li></ul><li>Adjunct tools<br />3/16/2011<br />http://www.aaeebl.org<br />13<br />
  59. 59. Questions beget questions<br />Who owns portfolio?<br />Who supports portfolio?<br />Who trains students to use?<br />How to evaluate vendor’s sustainability/business model?<br />Can more than one portfolio system on exist on campus?<br />What other tools are needed?<br />What is the implication for other pre-existing software systems?<br />Is integration required?<br />How can faculty adapt to new processes and tools?<br />Who knows enough to lead?<br />What models are out there to guide us?<br />What role does career services play?<br />What role does guidance and student services play?<br />Is there an interest in supporting life long learning of the student/alumni<br />3/16/2011<br />AAEEBL.org<br />
  60. 60. Summary<br />Software assumes pedagogy neutrality or consistency but its not.<br />Tension between flexibility and chaos<br />Understand true motivation for portfolios adoption<br />Process maximizes or minimizes success<br />Barriers to adoption map to technology requirements (i.e. UI)<br />People want everything - use models don’t follow<br />Pick your spots, especially early on<br />Understand what will be measured<br />3/16/2011<br />AAEEBL.org<br />

×