Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Glyn Moody TAFTA/TTIP talk at re:publica 14

1,991 views

Published on

This short talk presents a brief background to the Transatlantic Trade & Investment Partnership (TTIP), also known as TAFTA, and explains why the predicted benefits are far smaller than are generally believed. It also explores an important but neglected aspect: the likely costs.

Published in: Technology, Business
  • Be the first to comment

Glyn Moody TAFTA/TTIP talk at re:publica 14

  1. 1.    transatlantic trade & investment partnership glyn moody
  2. 2.    transatlantic trade  EU+US  one half world's GDP  one third of world trade flows  EU<->US trade €500bn (2012)  trade agreement to reduce costs  tariffs  under 3%  TTIP is not a traditional trade agreement (except in its lack of transparency)
  3. 3.    non-tariff barriers (NTBs)  different regulations in EU, US  health, safety, environment, labour, financial  EU bans on GMOs, chlorine washing for chickens, hormones in beef; greater data protection  for citizens  welfare enhancing  cultural expressions  for TTIP: "trade irritants"
  4. 4.    tackling NTBs  levelling down - EU says no  levelling up - US says no  mutual recognition  chemicals in cosmetics  1300 ingredients banned in EU  11 ingredients banned in US  1289 chemicals banned in EU could be used in US products sold here  (future) convergence
  5. 5.    regulatory council  "living agreement" - De Gucht  "Horizontal Chapter on Regulatory Coherence"  "impact assessment/cost benefit analysis on proposed regulatory measures covered by this Chapter, should assess impacts on international and in particular transatlantic trade"  dilute/block legislation at a very early stage
  6. 6.    investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS)  basic idea is to protect investors from arbitrary government actions or weak court systems in developing countries  achieved by allowing companies to take action directly against governments  using specialist external tribunals  3 lawyers, meeting in secret
  7. 7.    ISDS (1)  over 500 cases (since 1987)  Ecuador - oil contract ($1.77bn)  Germany - phasing out nuclear power (€3.7bn; Energy Charter)  Canada – fracking ban ($250m)  Canada - Eli Lilly patents ($500m)  Australia, Uruguay – adding warnings to cigarette packs ($2bn)  2013 saw 57 more; Czech Rep. (7), Spain (6), Croatia (2), Hungary (2), Slovakia (2), Greece (1)
  8. 8.    ISDS (2)  EU - fracking, GMOs, pesticide bans; labour laws; software patents etc  14,400 US companies with 50,800 European subsidiaries  ISDS a ticking trade time-bomb  even European Commission trying to "improve" ISDS  chilling effect on future policy  Canada's experience under NAFTA
  9. 9.    do we need ISDS?  "US investment in the EU is 3 times higher than in all of Asia"  "EU investment in US is around 8 times the amount of EU investment in India and China together."  US invested €1.3 trillion in EU  EU invested €1.4 trillion in US  no problem to solve; no need  insurance (World Bank)  ISDS = socialisation of risk
  10. 10.    TTIP benefits (1)  Bertelsmann Stiftung (June 2013)  "The leveling of the barriers with the USA thus leads to a decline in trade that came about as a result of preferential treatment of intra-European trade flow"  intra-EU exports fall by 25%-41%  drop by €650bn/year  TTIP would hollow out the EU economically
  11. 11.    TTIP benefits (2)  Centre for Economic Policy Research (March 2013)  for European Commission  tariffs only: extra EU GDP of €24bn - 0.1% of GDP  ambitious comprehensive:  50% of "actionable" NTB removed  extra EU GDP of €119bn - 0.48%  extra €90bn for US GDP, extra €100bn for rest of world
  12. 12.    TTIP benefits (3)  "ambitious comprehensive" forecast gives extra 0.48%  in *2027* - 0.48% is cumulative GDP boost over 10 years  GDP growth is measured year-on- year - how much GDP goes up *in a year* (UK 2013: 1.7%)  on average, extra GDP growth per year resulting from TTIP will be O.05%
  13. 13.    TTIP costs  OFSE report (31 March 2014)  for GUE/NGL (Group of the European United Left/Nordic Green Left)  forgone tariffs - €30bn  labour adjustment costs - €10bn  forgone tax income and social security contributions - €7bn  ISDS - billions of Euros  social costs of regulatory change  health costs, ecosystem costs, amenity loss, cultural loss
  14. 14.    is it worth it? glyn.moody@gmail.com @glynmoody on Twitter/identi.ca +glynmoody on Google+ opendotdotdot.blogspot.com

×