Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Enhancing Community Resilience in Bugesera, GWP Eastern Africa


Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Enhancing Community Resilience in Bugesera, GWP Eastern Africa

  1. 1. Enhancing community resilience in Lake Cyohoha Catchment, Bugesera Region (Burundi/Rwanda) Prepared for presentation during the WACDEP Global Technical Coordination Workshop-Tuesday 24 June 2014 by Patrick SAFARI , Regional Coordinator, GWP Eastern Africa
  2. 2. Outline 1. Background 2. The process 3. Learning points 4. Summary
  3. 3. WP1: Kagera Basin- LVBC/EAC Burundi and Rwanda WP2: National Plans WP3: Investment strategies WP4: Investment projects WP5: Bugesera region: L. Cyohoha catchment-demo. WP6&7: K and CB (community management, local adaptation, participatory processes) WP8: Partnership Building /water governance (CWPs, Catchment, community) 1. Background: Water, Climate and Development Program (WACDEP) in EnA Region
  4. 4. 2.1.The Process: Identifying challenges: Why interventions? Water pollution Encroaching lake shore/ wetlands Poor agricultural practices, over grazing Poor access to water supply Water scarcity Shortage of fuel wood Deforestation / soil erosion Poverty High Population growth Poor community structures Poor access to social services and infrastructure Seasonal Drought, floods
  5. 5. Burundi Rwanda 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Kilometers µ Legend Country Boundary Lake Cyohoha CatchmentLegend Cyohoha catchment Countries 0 3 6 9 121.5 Kilometers · Burundi Rwanda 508 km2 369 km2 in Bu 139 km2in Rw lake is like a river of 27 km long and 0.5 to 2 km wide. It branches up to 9 km long The lake Cyohoha is separated from the river Akanyaru by a broadband swamps. 2.2.The Process: Detail Situational Analysis-a Defining hydrological boundary as a unit of analysis, planning and management: L. Cyohoha catchment:
  6. 6. Hydrologist/Hydrogeologist, Environmentalist/ watershed management expert/ forester/ wetland ecologist, Agriculture expert, Socio-economist, Gender Expert, GIS Expert Multi-disciplinary and multi-sectoral approach Bu-Rw Team for Situational Analysis in L. Cyohoha catchment 2.2.The Process: Detail Situational Analysis-b Technical Analysis by Joint (Bu-Rw) Team of Experts
  7. 7. Hydro-climatic and environmental data – Climate –temperature, rainfall – Hydrology: surface water, groundwater?, water uses (abstraction for drinking, irrigation), – Topography-slope classes – Land use/land cover – Soils Socio-economic data – Population, human settlement, Gender – Social services-health, water supply, education, market, energy use – Infrastructre-road, telephone, electricity, communication, bank – Economic activities, Employment-agri – Institutions-farmers’ organizations 2.2.The Process: Detail Situational Analysis-b Technical Analysis by Joint (Bu-Rw) Team of Experts
  8. 8. Participatory process during situational analysis • history of drought/flood hazards, changes in rainfall seasons, • local knowledge systems, local coping mechanisms, community structures • Source of household energy, accessing it and challenges 2.2.The Process: Detail Situational Analysis-c Awareness raising, sensitization, participatory analysis
  9. 9. Frequent drought/flood hazards, changes in rainfall seasons,
  10. 10. A. Environmental degradation: Differences in enforcing policies/laws affecting shared systems, Weak community structures/capacities 2.2.The Process: Detail Situational Analysis-d Analyzing problems/challenges and hot spots • Drought and flood prone areas • conflicts over use of resources • water scarcity • Lack of fuel wood • degraded catchments • Erosion, deforestation degraded wetlands Pollution
  11. 11. 3. Poor access to safe drinking water 2.2.The Process: Detail Situational Analysis-d Analyzing problems/challenges and hot spots 2. Traditional cookers and lack of fuelwood
  12. 12. 2.3.The Process: prioritizing interventions/–based on the situational analysis, joint review and consultations with stakeholders
  13. 13. Lesson 1: Participatory process: understanding the community needs The approach should be integrated, participatory and owned by communities:  Integrated within a hydrological boundary  Integrated to satisfy communities’ multiple needs-water as entry point  Integrated to the local government development plans  Participation and ownership by communities & other stakeholders ….sustainability 3. Learning Points
  14. 14. Lesson 2: establish/ strengthen partnership for implementation frameworks
  15. 15. Summary of priority interventions-1 Priority Interventions Mechanism for implementation Water: Extending water supply systems to communities Work with partners-Utility, local government Private suppliers/contactors Energy: Introduce improved cooker stoves, biogas Work with partners-CONCERN Community groups/associations (Women groups) Private suppliers/contractors Food security: new agronomic practices Work with partners-Local Govt. office Community groups/associations Environment: Lake Cyohoha buffer zone protection, Upper catchment protection Work with partners-RENGOF, Community Associations, Youth Group
  16. 16. Priority Interventions Mechanism for implementation Strengthen/establish Community structures for managing/producing: • water points • improved cook stoves • seedlings, • Parts of the catchment: buffer zone, sub-catchment • L.Cyohoha catchment • Stakeholders’ platforms Work with partners-Local Govt., NGOs, Community Groups/Associations, Private suppliers/contractors Awareness raising, CB, training on: • Challenges: environmental degradation, climate change, water scarcity, energy security • Water and other NR management: importance, ownership and participation • Community structures • New approaches, methods, technologies, management Work with partners-Local Govt., NGOs, Community Groups/Associations, Private suppliers/contractors Summary of priority interventions-2
  17. 17. Priority Interventions Mechanism for implementation Strengthen information systems • Baseline and updated state of the environment/NRs • Community M&E systems • Local early warning systems • Community exchange programs- community-to-community learning Work with partners-Local Govt., NGOs, Community Groups/Associations, Private suppliers/contractors Developing L. Cyohoha catchment integrated management plan Summary of priority interventions-3
  18. 18. KAMPEKA TUNDA BURENGE BIHARAGU NYAKAYAGA Kiri Rugasa Kigoma Gitwe Kiyonza Nyamabuye Rubuga Kigina Nyakarama Gaturanda Nyabikenke 30°10'0"E30°5'0"E30°0'0"E 2°20'0"S 2°20'0"S 2°25'0"S 2°25'0"S 2°30'0"S 2°30'0"S 2°35'0"S 2°35'0"S · 0 2.5 5 7.5 101.25 Kilometers Legend Lake Cyohoha Cyohoha Catchment Prioritized Intervention Area (Burundi) Prioritized Intervention Area (Rwanda) Country Boundary Rwanda Burundi Lake Cyohoha Lake Cyohoha catchment-priority areas and interventions • Watershed management • Rainwater harvesting • Buffer zone management • Biogas • Improved cook- stoves • Water supply Biogas Water supply Buffer zone management
  19. 19. Interventions at community level should: • Consider the local context, challenges and priorities (communities and ecosystems). • Use both modern (hydro-climatic) information and local knowledge • linked and contribute to socio- economic needs of communities • Contribute to strengthening Community structures and building their capacities Lesson 3: Participatory process: addressing the the community needs
  20. 20. Lesson 4: engaging local media for raising community Training and informing media to inform the public
  21. 21. Lesson 5: Linking policy with practices Differences in enforcement of national environmental laws resulted in differences in the level of degradation of the same system-L.Cyohoha Catchment
  22. 22. Lesson 6 : Political support and buy-in
  23. 23. Political support for WACDEP during WACDEP Coordination meeting in Kigali
  24. 24. Buy-in and appreciation of WACDEP by Nile TAC-COM Meeting in Kharthoum on 19-20 June 2014
  25. 25. Summary of major challenges N challenges Actions taken 1 Managing expectations: • Policy/practices • National/local level • High expectations by communities and local government for quick investments on the ground  Using demonstrations to influence both policy & practices 2 Differences in national policies and their enforcements  Facilitate experience sharing to influence law enforcement 3 Unilateral thinking vs. trans boundary nature of the systems  More stakeholders' consultation, awareness raising 4 Engaging stakeholders in WACDEP activities (key sectors), including political buy-in  workshops, bilateral meetings and providing WACDEP awareness packages  designating focal points for WACDEP in respective key sectors
  26. 26. • Investing in WRM (at community level) is an important adaptation strategy • WACDEP is supporting demonstration of interventions for water security and climate resilience at community level, and the on-going processes are providing some lessons • There is a need to develop bigger investment projects based on demonstrations for scaling-up beyond the target communities • Future programs may consider the lessons from on-going processes and experiences 3. Summary/Conclusion
  27. 27. WRM approach : recommended as a tool for building resilience to climate change in Lake Cyohoha Catchment Stakeholders participation Water Allocation Pollution Control Information Management systems Financial MechanismFlood & Drought Management systems Basin Planning Monitoring mechanism INTEGRATED WATER and NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN LAKE CYOHOHA CATCHMENT
  28. 28. THANK YOU!