SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 4
Rough cut amendments
I made some changes to my product in light of my audience feedback as I needed to ensure my magazine looked as professional as possible in order for my target audience to find my product attractive and appealing. I didn’t make any changes to my front cover as when pitching my rough cuts to my target audience, they stated that they liked my front cover how it was. Why change my product?
My target audience claimed that they were not keen on the white border  Surrounding the contents page, so I Removed it and made my images larger So it became more appealing. They also said I should fill the white space as much as possible. Therefore, I added a subscription box I also feel that this is an advantage for my product, as subscription details can be found in the contents page of professional products. So in a sense, my changes made my contents page look more professional. Changes to my contents page
One of my main criticisms when obtaining audience feedback was that the images on my DPS looked stretched. Therefore to make my magazine remain professional and appealing I resolved this by adjusting my images. I was also told I should start my article by using drops caps, as this is common within Rock Magazines. I was also told that I should make the questions the interviewer asked in red, so that the audience could identify who was speaking in the magazine. I was also told to break up my article with a quote so that the article did not appear to be too “wordy” as my target audience claimed that they do not enjoy reading articles with too much text and it would appeal to them more if there was not as much text. Changes to my double page spread

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Evaluation Question 6.
Evaluation Question 6. Evaluation Question 6.
Evaluation Question 6. gjdsweeten
 
Optimizing columnar stores
Optimizing columnar storesOptimizing columnar stores
Optimizing columnar storesIstvan Szukacs
 
Ginintuang parihaba at maladiyosang proporsyon-M-Macutay
Ginintuang parihaba at maladiyosang proporsyon-M-MacutayGinintuang parihaba at maladiyosang proporsyon-M-Macutay
Ginintuang parihaba at maladiyosang proporsyon-M-MacutayNancy Gomez
 
RDET Format (Research Study)
RDET Format (Research Study)RDET Format (Research Study)
RDET Format (Research Study)Nancy Gomez
 
Week 5 scale_and_measurement
Week 5 scale_and_measurementWeek 5 scale_and_measurement
Week 5 scale_and_measurementSani Satjachaliao
 
Evaluation question 4 how did you use
Evaluation question 4   how did you useEvaluation question 4   how did you use
Evaluation question 4 how did you usegjdsweeten
 
มโนทัศน์ของการคำนวณปรับแก้
มโนทัศน์ของการคำนวณปรับแก้มโนทัศน์ของการคำนวณปรับแก้
มโนทัศน์ของการคำนวณปรับแก้Chokchai Puatanachokchai
 

Viewers also liked (9)

Week 9 research_design
Week 9 research_designWeek 9 research_design
Week 9 research_design
 
Evaluation Question 6.
Evaluation Question 6. Evaluation Question 6.
Evaluation Question 6.
 
Optimizing columnar stores
Optimizing columnar storesOptimizing columnar stores
Optimizing columnar stores
 
Ginintuang parihaba at maladiyosang proporsyon-M-Macutay
Ginintuang parihaba at maladiyosang proporsyon-M-MacutayGinintuang parihaba at maladiyosang proporsyon-M-Macutay
Ginintuang parihaba at maladiyosang proporsyon-M-Macutay
 
Technology
TechnologyTechnology
Technology
 
RDET Format (Research Study)
RDET Format (Research Study)RDET Format (Research Study)
RDET Format (Research Study)
 
Week 5 scale_and_measurement
Week 5 scale_and_measurementWeek 5 scale_and_measurement
Week 5 scale_and_measurement
 
Evaluation question 4 how did you use
Evaluation question 4   how did you useEvaluation question 4   how did you use
Evaluation question 4 how did you use
 
มโนทัศน์ของการคำนวณปรับแก้
มโนทัศน์ของการคำนวณปรับแก้มโนทัศน์ของการคำนวณปรับแก้
มโนทัศน์ของการคำนวณปรับแก้
 

Similar to Rough cut magazine amendments optimized

Improvements on front cover
Improvements on front coverImprovements on front cover
Improvements on front coverLunaMaker
 
Draft feeback
Draft feebackDraft feeback
Draft feebackSteph2000
 
Draft Feedback
Draft FeedbackDraft Feedback
Draft FeedbackSteph2000
 
Magazine Advert And Digipak Evaluation 3
Magazine Advert And Digipak Evaluation 3Magazine Advert And Digipak Evaluation 3
Magazine Advert And Digipak Evaluation 3Steph2000
 
Draft Feedback
Draft FeedbackDraft Feedback
Draft FeedbackSteph2000
 
Media evaluation Question 1.
Media evaluation Question 1.Media evaluation Question 1.
Media evaluation Question 1.chelseamaypashley
 
Evaluation - Question 3
Evaluation - Question 3 Evaluation - Question 3
Evaluation - Question 3 Alice Broadley
 
First Draft of Double Page Spread and Responce to Feedback
First Draft of Double Page Spread  and Responce to FeedbackFirst Draft of Double Page Spread  and Responce to Feedback
First Draft of Double Page Spread and Responce to FeedbackLara Berndes
 
Peer assessment feedback media
Peer assessment feedback mediaPeer assessment feedback media
Peer assessment feedback mediaTim McMorrow
 
Evaluation Question 3
Evaluation Question 3Evaluation Question 3
Evaluation Question 3Beth Robinson
 
Evaluation - Question 3
Evaluation - Question 3Evaluation - Question 3
Evaluation - Question 3Mjames00
 
Evaluation - Question 3
Evaluation - Question 3Evaluation - Question 3
Evaluation - Question 3Matthew James
 
How did you attract and address your audience
How did you attract  and address your audienceHow did you attract  and address your audience
How did you attract and address your audienceLareesa Warner
 
A2 Evaluation Question 3
A2 Evaluation Question 3A2 Evaluation Question 3
A2 Evaluation Question 3Owen Barnett
 
Evaluation question 5
Evaluation question 5 Evaluation question 5
Evaluation question 5 Matteo Rimini
 

Similar to Rough cut magazine amendments optimized (20)

Improvements on front cover
Improvements on front coverImprovements on front cover
Improvements on front cover
 
Draft feeback
Draft feebackDraft feeback
Draft feeback
 
Draft Feedback
Draft FeedbackDraft Feedback
Draft Feedback
 
Magazine Advert And Digipak Evaluation 3
Magazine Advert And Digipak Evaluation 3Magazine Advert And Digipak Evaluation 3
Magazine Advert And Digipak Evaluation 3
 
Draft Feedback
Draft FeedbackDraft Feedback
Draft Feedback
 
Media evaluation Q1.
Media evaluation Q1.Media evaluation Q1.
Media evaluation Q1.
 
Media evaluation q1
Media evaluation q1Media evaluation q1
Media evaluation q1
 
Media evaluation Question 1.
Media evaluation Question 1.Media evaluation Question 1.
Media evaluation Question 1.
 
Media evaluation question 1
Media evaluation question 1Media evaluation question 1
Media evaluation question 1
 
7. evaluation(3)
7. evaluation(3)7. evaluation(3)
7. evaluation(3)
 
Evaluation - Question 3
Evaluation - Question 3 Evaluation - Question 3
Evaluation - Question 3
 
First Draft of Double Page Spread and Responce to Feedback
First Draft of Double Page Spread  and Responce to FeedbackFirst Draft of Double Page Spread  and Responce to Feedback
First Draft of Double Page Spread and Responce to Feedback
 
Peer assessment feedback media
Peer assessment feedback mediaPeer assessment feedback media
Peer assessment feedback media
 
Audience feedback
Audience feedbackAudience feedback
Audience feedback
 
Evaluation Question 3
Evaluation Question 3Evaluation Question 3
Evaluation Question 3
 
Evaluation - Question 3
Evaluation - Question 3Evaluation - Question 3
Evaluation - Question 3
 
Evaluation - Question 3
Evaluation - Question 3Evaluation - Question 3
Evaluation - Question 3
 
How did you attract and address your audience
How did you attract  and address your audienceHow did you attract  and address your audience
How did you attract and address your audience
 
A2 Evaluation Question 3
A2 Evaluation Question 3A2 Evaluation Question 3
A2 Evaluation Question 3
 
Evaluation question 5
Evaluation question 5 Evaluation question 5
Evaluation question 5
 

Rough cut magazine amendments optimized

  • 2. I made some changes to my product in light of my audience feedback as I needed to ensure my magazine looked as professional as possible in order for my target audience to find my product attractive and appealing. I didn’t make any changes to my front cover as when pitching my rough cuts to my target audience, they stated that they liked my front cover how it was. Why change my product?
  • 3. My target audience claimed that they were not keen on the white border Surrounding the contents page, so I Removed it and made my images larger So it became more appealing. They also said I should fill the white space as much as possible. Therefore, I added a subscription box I also feel that this is an advantage for my product, as subscription details can be found in the contents page of professional products. So in a sense, my changes made my contents page look more professional. Changes to my contents page
  • 4. One of my main criticisms when obtaining audience feedback was that the images on my DPS looked stretched. Therefore to make my magazine remain professional and appealing I resolved this by adjusting my images. I was also told I should start my article by using drops caps, as this is common within Rock Magazines. I was also told that I should make the questions the interviewer asked in red, so that the audience could identify who was speaking in the magazine. I was also told to break up my article with a quote so that the article did not appear to be too “wordy” as my target audience claimed that they do not enjoy reading articles with too much text and it would appeal to them more if there was not as much text. Changes to my double page spread