1.
INTRODUCTION TO ETHICAL ISSUES IN PUBLIC HEALTH PRACTICE & RESEARCH <ul><li>Ghaiath M. A. Hussein </li></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>MBBS (ZAU, Sudan) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>MHSc. (Bioethics, U of T, Canada) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>MD (1st Part Comm. Med., SMSB) </li></ul></ul></ul>JPCMFM, Jan 2- 5, 2010

2.
CONTACT INFORMATION [email_address] 0567995290 Office hours by appointment Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

3.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT <ul><ul><li>Most of the slides used in this presentations are used with permission from: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Barbara Secker (JCB); and </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Lawrence M. Hinman ( http://ethics.sandiego.edu ) </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

4.
PRESENTATION OVERVIEW <ul><ul><li>Outline of the course </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>What’s (bio)ethics? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>What is an ‘ethical issue’? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>How do we take our ethical decision? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Schools of thought in Bioethics </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

5.
OVERVIEW OF TODAY’S SESSION <ul><ul><li>Introductions </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Course objectives, learning methods and overview </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Assignments </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Ethics and Bioethics: Definitions & Context </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Ethical Theories: Purposes and Approaches </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Persons and Personhood </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Facts and Values </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

6.
COURSE OBJECTIVES <ul><ul><li>To consider critically a range of conceptual and ethical issues that we (as individuals and societies) face in health care provision. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>To analyze these issues using ethical frameworks, and to assess the value of such frameworks. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>To provide an opportunity to reflect critically on, challenge, develop and refine our ethical positions on particular issues. </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

7.
LEARNING METHODS <ul><ul><li>Majority of learning done independently (readings, reflections, assignments) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Course director facilitates learning in class and by appointment </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Classes: mix of short presentations, small and large group discussions, problem/case-based learning, student seminars </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Learn from each other’s experiences, perspectives, arguments, etc. </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

8.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES: <ul><ul><li>to understand the role of ethical principles, theories and frameworks in bioethics </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>to explore the concept of personhood </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>to understand the “fact/value” distinction </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>to understand and critically assess utilitarian ethical frameworks </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>to understand the key concepts of principlism </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>to understand and critically assess Kantian ethical theory </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

9.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES: <ul><ul><li>to understand and critically assess Kantian ethical theory </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>to explore the notion of “relational autonomy” </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>to understand and critically assess social contract theory </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>to understand the key concept of justice </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>to understand how different conceptions of justice grow out of different ethical frameworks </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>to discuss some concrete problems of resource allocation and priority setting in health contexts </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

10.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES: <ul><ul><li>to understand and critically assess feminist bioethics </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>to consider the usefulness of the different ethical frameworks for health care and research </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>to consider the potential of developing a “global bioethics” </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>to consider cultural, religious and spiritual aspects of ethical decision-making </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>to understand and critically assess Islamic ethics and Christian ethics </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

11.
COURSE EVALUATION <ul><ul><li>Written ‘publishable’ paper (1500-4000 words) (60%) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>– due 20 January 2010 </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Seminar co-presentation (40%) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>– during the course of the module (inclusive) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>“ Plan B”: MCQs and short notes ( according to the JPCMFM regulations ) </li></ul></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

12.
ISSUE OF ETHICAL CONCERN IN PUBLIC HEALTH Why ethics in public health? Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

13.
LET’S GIVE IT A THOUGHT! <ul><ul><li>Within its efforts to control the spread of Pandemic Influenza A H1N1 during the Hajj season, the government was able to provide a total of 3,000,000 doses of the newly produced vaccine. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The pilgrims are estimated to be 3,500,000; the working staff who are in contact with pilgrims (entries, security & health) are about 120,000 persons </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Who should have the vaccine? </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

14.
Figure 10.1 Changes leading to altered interaction between microbes, animals, and plants Genetic changes in microbes, plants, animals and humans Social change in human populations - in material circumstances, and behavior Human interventions, discoveries and manipulations of the environment Natural environmental change Influence on individuals and families - varies by place Over time population differences host, agent or environment factors Population variations in health and disease patterns Analysis and interpretation of differences to gain insight into the evolution of these patterns, and hence the causes Demonstrate population differences in disease rates by time, place and person/population Use information to improve health The phenomena underlying population variations Epidemiology tries to understand above phenomena

15.
DIFFICULTIES FACING PUBLIC HEALTH PRACTICE <ul><ul><li>Scarcity of resources </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Access to health services </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Lack of trained personnel </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Poverty, illiteracy , legal status </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Role of local beliefs </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Role of families and communities (leaders). </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

16.
LEVELS OF MORAL RESPONSE <ul><ul><li>The expressive level (unanalyzed expressions or feeling that, by themselves, don’t provide reasons or justification) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The pre-reflective level (justification via law, religious tenets, social values, codes of ethics, etc.; accepted uncritically) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The reflective level (reasoned ethical argument/defence based on ethical principles, rules, virtues, values to which we consciously subscribe; justification provided) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Thomas J and Waluchow W, 1998 </li></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

17.
MORAL, OR MORALITY <ul><ul><li>Pertaining to or concerned with the principles or rules of right conduct or the distinction between right and wrong </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Morality is social obligation </li></ul></ul>11/6/2008 Ethical Issues In Community and Rural Health Care

18.
MORAL DILEMMA <ul><ul><li>An agent morally ought to do A, and ought to do Y, but is precluded by circumstances from doing both </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>If A is done it is desirable in some respects and not desirable in other respects </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Moral reasons are weighty on both fronts but not dominant </li></ul></ul>11/6/2008 Ethical Issues In Community and Rural Health Care

19.
ETHICS <ul><ul><li>explicit critical reflection on moral beliefs, practices and problems </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>philosophical study of morality </li></ul></ul><ul><li>This is at the reflective level… </li></ul><ul><li>(contrast with “descriptive ethics”) </li></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

20.
WHAT IS ETHICS? <ul><ul><li>A system of moral principles </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The rule of conduct recognized in respect to particular society or human actions </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Way of examining moral life </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Moral reasoning of actions </li></ul></ul>11/6/2008 Ethical Issues In Community and Rural Health Care

21.
AN ISSUE IS AN ETHICAL ISSUE WHEN… … we encounter conflicting values, beliefs, goals, or responsibilities … we are concerned that persons or their rights are not being respected … we are concerned about fairness and justice … we are unsure what we should do or why we should do it, morally speaking Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

22.
BRANCHES OF ETHICS <ul><ul><li>metaethics </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>general normative ethics </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>“ applied” or practical ethics </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>bioethics </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>legal ethics </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>business ethics </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>environmental ethics </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>organizational ethics </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>… </li></ul></ul></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

23.
BIOETHICS <ul><li>Bioethics involves critical reflection on moral problems faced in health care and research settings toward: </li></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>deciding what we should do (what decisions are morally right or acceptable); </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>explaining why we should do it (how do we justify our decision in moral terms); and </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>describing how we should do it (the method or manner of our response when we act on our decision). </li></ul></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

24.
WHAT IS BIOETHICS? <ul><ul><li>Bioethics is about the study of ethical issues arising along health care or research, and the associated decision-making process to resolve them. </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

25.
Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

26.
BIOETHICS Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010 <ul><ul><li>The study of ethical issues raised by public health interventions </li></ul></ul>

27.
WHEN DOES AN ISSUE IN PRACTICE BE AN ETHICAL ISSUE? (MODIFIED FROM BARBARA SECKER AND FRANK WAGNER) <ul><ul><li>When there is conflict of moral values , beliefs, and objectives e.g. between the health care providers and the patients. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>When there is conflict of commitments and responsibilities : e.g. saving patients' lives vs. using the available resources &quot;rationally&quot; </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>When there is the concern that our patients rights/values are not respected . </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>When the issue in focus is related to justice in allocating the available resources </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Finally, when we, as care providers feel that we are not sure what we should do . </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

28.
ETHICAL JUSTIFICATION <ul><li>In ethics, the support/reasons ultimately come from moral values, principles and theories: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>“ I think we should do X because A and B are really important values” </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>“ Y wouldn’t be appropriate because it violates principles A and B” </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>“ X would be the right thing to do because of our obligation to do A” </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010 Jonathan Breslin, 2006

29.
ETHICAL JUSTIFICATION Ethical theories and principles as lenses: “ Doing bioethics well requires appeal to the insights provided by multiple theories…the metaphor of lenses provides a more accurate and a more productive understanding of the role of theories in bioethics…” (Sherwin, The Politics of Women’s Health , 205). Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

30.
ON WHAT BASIS DO WE MAKE MORAL DECISIONS WITH OUR CLIENTS? <ul><ul><li>“ Do what the Bible tells you”-- Divine Command Theories </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>“ Follow your conscience”-- The Ethics of Conscience </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>“ Watch out for #1”-- Ethical Egoism </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>“ Do the right thing”-- The Ethics of Duty </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>“ Don't dis' me”-- The Ethics of Respect </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>“ ...all Men are created ...with certain unalienable Rights”-- The Ethics of Rights </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>“ Make the world a better place”-- Utilitarianism </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>“ Daddy, that’s not fair”-- The Ethics of Justice </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>“ Be a good person”-- Virtue Ethics </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

31.
&quot;DO WHAT THE QURAN/BIBLE TELLS YOU” DIVINE COMMAND THEORIES <ul><ul><li>Being good is equivalent to doing whatever the Bible--or the Qur’an or some other sacred text or source of revelation--tells you to do. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>“ What is right” equals “What God tells me to do.” </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

32.
“ FOLLOW YOUR CONSCIENCE” THE ETHICS OF OUR INNER VOICE <ul><ul><li>Conscience tells us what is right or wrong </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Often has a religious source </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>May be founded in a notion of human nature </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Is often negative in character, telling us what is not right </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

33.
&quot;WATCH OUT FOR #1” ETHICAL EGOISM <ul><ul><li>Says the only person to look out for is yourself </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Ayn Rand, The Ethics of Selfishness </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Well known for her novel, especially Atlas Shrugged </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

34.
&quot;DO THE RIGHT THING&quot; THE ETHICS OF DUTY <ul><ul><li>Begins with the conviction that ethics is about doing what is right, about doing your duty. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Duty may be determined by: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Reason </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Kant: Do what any rational agent should do </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Professional role </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>A physician’s duty to care for the sick </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Social role </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>A parent’s duty to care for his or her children </li></ul></ul></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

35.
DEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS (DUTY-BASED ETHICS) <ul><ul><li>Some say consequences are morally irrelevant </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Others say consequences are morally relevant but by themselves don’t determine the ethical nature of action </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Focus: rights and duties; permissible vs. mandatory actions </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Key questions: Are we treating cases similar in all morally relevant respects alike? Are we respecting persons? </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

36.
&quot;DON'T DIS' ME&quot; THE ETHICS OF RESPECT <ul><ul><li>Human interactions should be governed by rules of respect </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>What counts as respect can vary from one culture to another </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Examples: </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>spitting in the sand </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>showing the soles of one’s shoes--Richardson </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>What is it that merits respect? </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

37.
“ ... ALL MEN ARE CREATED ...WITH CERTAIN UNALIENABLE RIGHTS ” THE ETHICS OF RIGHTS <ul><ul><li>The most influential moral notion of the past two centuries </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Established minimal conditions of human decency </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

38.
“ MAKE THE WORLD A BETTER PLACE” UTILITARIANISM <ul><ul><li>Seeks to reduce suffering and increase pleasure or happiness </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Demands a high degree of self-sacrifice—we must consider the consequencs for everyone. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Utilitarians claim the purpose of morality is to make the world a better place. </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

39.
UTILITARIANISM (CONSEQUENCE-BASED ETHICS) <ul><ul><li>Actions not morally right in themselves—they become morally right if they produce certain consequences </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Focus: producing good consequences </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Utilitarianism is a popular consequence-based theory often appealed to in bioethics </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Key question : will this action produce the greatest overall amount of good (or the least overall harm) for the greatest number? </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

40.
“ DADDY, THAT’S NOT FAIR” THE ETHICS OF JUSTICE <ul><ul><li>Begins early in the family with fairness to all family members </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>What is fair for one should be fair for all. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Treating people equally may not mean treating them the same. </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

41.
&quot;BE A GOOD PERSON” VIRTUE ETHICS <ul><ul><li>Seeks to develop individual character </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Assumes good persons will make good decisions </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Developed by Plato and Aristotle </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Integral to the Jesuit tradition </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>The Spiritual Exercises </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Provides a way of integrating all the theories </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

42.
VIRTUE-BASED ETHICS <ul><ul><li>Emphasizes moral character—not just moral action </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Focus: not simply to act morally </li></ul></ul><ul><li>but to be moral </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Key questions: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>what kind of life should I live? </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>what kind of person should I be? </li></ul></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

43.
PRINCIPLISM <ul><li>Framework includes four clusters of moral principles for identifying and reflecting on moral problems: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Respect for autonomy (self-determination or self-governance) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Non-maleficence (avoiding harm) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Beneficence ( doing good) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Justice (treat people and groups fairly, including distributing resources fairly) </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

44.
FEMINIST ETHICS <ul><ul><li>oppression (of all people, in all its forms) is morally and politically unjust and must be addressed </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>social justice requires distributive justice plus fair relationships among social groups </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>the self is essentially a “self-in-relation” </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>autonomy should be a relational (rather than an individualistic) notion </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

45.
CLASSROOM APPLICATION Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

46.
FACTS & VALUES

47.
WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON: “ He killed her.” Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

48.
“ Treatment is futile.” Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

49.
FACTS, VALUES AND CENTRAL CONCEPTS Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010 <ul><ul><li>health </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>disease </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>disability </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>death </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>suffering </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>harm </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>benefit </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>best interests </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>quality of life </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>decision-making capacity </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>person </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>definition(s)? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>purely descriptive? value-laden? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>ethical significance? </li></ul></ul>

50.
THE FACT-VALUE DISTINCTION <ul><ul><li>fact: description of the way the world is; an actual state of affairs (“is”) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>value: judgment about the way things should be (“ought”) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>no “ought” can be deduced from an “is” </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

51.
THE FACT-VALUE DISTINCTION Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010 <ul><ul><li>“ Clearly we ought not perform this surgery since there is only a 1% chance of survival. This treatment would be medically futile.” </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>“ The patient scored only 10/30 on the MMSE so we should get consent from the substitute decision-maker.” </li></ul></ul>the inferential leap

52.
THE FACT-VALUE DISTINCTION Science is the century-old endeavour to bring together by means of systematic thought the perceptible phenomena of this world into as thorough-going an association as possible. To put it boldly, it is the attempt at a posteriori reconstruction of existence by the process of conceptualisation. Science can only ascertain what is, but not what should be, and outside of its domain value judgements of all kinds remain necessary. -- Albert Einstein Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

53.
PERSONS AND PERSONHOOD

54.
YOUR THOUGHTS/INTUITIONS… <ul><ul><li>What/who is a “person”? </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

55.
PERSONS AND PERSONHOOD <ul><ul><li>“ Personhood”: philosophical concept that attempts to capture the most basic properties of who persons are </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>“ Person”: one who has these most basic properties </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Ethical implications: many think persons ought to be treated better than nonpersons; many think persons have rights and nonpersons do not </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010 “ Human being” is a biological term that refers to homo sapiens…

56.
WHAT IS A PERSON? <ul><li>Some proposals: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>“ Persons” are individuals who have a sense of self, the ability to reason, possess—or are in the process of developing—a set of stable values and beliefs </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>“ Persons” are individuals who are “the subject of a life,” an on-going narrative </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

57.
PROPOSED CRITERIA FOR PERSONHOOD (FROM T.I. WHITE, 1991) Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010 <ul><ul><li>alive </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>aware </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>+ and - sensations </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>self-consciousness </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>controls own behaviour </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>recognizes other people and treats them appropriately </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>capable of analytical, conceptual thought </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>able to learn </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>can solve complicated problems with analytical thought </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>capacity for communication that suggests thought </li></ul></ul>

58.
“ HUMAN” VS. “PERSON” Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010 humans persons human persons

59.
FURRY PERSONS (?) Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010 Matti Hali Fellini

60.
WHO COUNTS AS A “PERSON”? <ul><ul><li>human embryos? fetuses? infants? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>non-human animals? (some? all?) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>humans in PVS? coma? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>humans with severe cognitive disabilities? advanced dementia? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>“ extraterrestrials”? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>other? </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

61.
“ MORAL AGENT” <ul><ul><li>“ Anyone responsible for the outcome of her or his actions in a specific situation” </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>“ Agency requires that a person be able to understand the situation and be free to act voluntarily on her or his best judgment” </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Agency “implies that the person intends for something to happen as a result of that action” </li></ul></ul><ul><li>(Ruth Purtilo) </li></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

62.
“ MORAL PATIENT” <ul><ul><li>“ Moral patients” are worthy of ethical regard because they have interests (i.e., they can be harmed or benefited) but cannot be held morally accountable for their actions (e.g., infants, human beings with severe mental disabilities, or animals) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>(Tom Regan) </li></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

63.
ETHICAL THEORIES PURPOSES AND APPROACHES

64.
ETHICAL REASONING AND JUSTIFICATION <ul><li>Requires: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>moral awareness & imagination </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>knowledge </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>critical reflection </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>practical reasoning </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010 What actions are ethically justifiable? Why? What character traits are ethically desirable? Why?

65.
CORE KNOWLEDGE <ul><ul><li>How do we help reason through an ethical issue? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>What counts as an ethical justification of a decision or action? How do we argue for and defend our ethical claims? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Are there any tools that can help guide us? </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

66.
ETHICAL REASONING <ul><li>Values and ethical principles </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Value = something a person/community has identified as important (e.g., autonomy/self-determination) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Values by themselves don't tell us what we ought to do </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Key values in bioethics have corresponding ethical principles meant to guide action (e.g., principle of respect for autonomy) </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

67.
ETHICAL REASONING Critical reflection Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010 Jonathan Breslin, 2006 To give careful consideration To question assumptions, both our own and others’ Critical reflection is important to avoid knee-jerk emotional responses and “jumping to conclusions,” as well as failing to take other perspectives into account…

68.
ETHICAL JUSTIFICATION “ Ethics focuses on the reasons why an action is considered right or wrong. It asks people to justify their positions and beliefs by rational arguments that can persuade others.” -- Bernard Lo. Resolving Ethical Dilemmas , 3rd ed. (2005) Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010 Jonathan Breslin, 2006

69.
ETHICAL JUSTIFICATION <ul><li>Practical reasoning </li></ul><ul><ul><li>The ability to reach a well-supported [i.e., well-reasoned] answer to a well-defined question ( Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy ) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The idea of the well-supported answer simply means being able to provide good reasons for the conclusion you reach or the opinion you hold. </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010 Jonathan Breslin, 2006

70.
ETHICAL JUSTIFICATION <ul><li>In ethics, the support/reasons ultimately come from moral values, principles and theories: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>“ I think we should do X because A and B are really important values” </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>“ Y wouldn’t be appropriate because it violates principles A and B” </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>“ X would be the right thing to do because of our obligation to do A” </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010 Jonathan Breslin, 2006

71.
APPROACHES TO ETHICAL REASONING <ul><ul><li>deductive approach </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>inductive approach </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>reflective equilibrium or coherence theory </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>ethical theory judgments in particular cases </li></ul></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

72.
ETHICAL JUSTIFICATION <ul><ul><li>There is no universally accepted ethical theory or top-ranked principle </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>… but that’s ok/understandable… </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Different theories and principles illuminate different concerns that can serve as points of reflection </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Frameworks—or lenses—with which to reflect and attempt to resolve problems </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010 NOW WHAT??

73.
ETHICAL JUSTIFICATION Ethical theories and principles as lenses: “ Doing bioethics well requires appeal to the insights provided by multiple theories…the metaphor of lenses provides a more accurate and a more productive understanding of the role of theories in bioethics…” (Sherwin, The Politics of Women’s Health , 205). Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

74.
ETHICAL THEORIES, PRINCIPLES AND FRAMEWORKS <ul><ul><li>help identify, explore, clarify the ethical questions/issues </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>help analyze and assess basic underlying assumptions </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

75.
ETHICAL THEORIES, PRINCIPLES AND FRAMEWORKS <ul><ul><li>help develop, justify and criticize arguments, decisions, recommendations, policies, etc. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>help identify where arguments go wrong (your own and those of others) by exposing gaps, fallacies, inconsistencies, and/or unexpected consequences </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

76.
OVERVIEW ON ETHICAL THEORIES <ul><ul><li>Utilitarianism </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Deontology </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Principlism </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Virtue Ethics </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Feminist Ethics </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Casuistry </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Religious Ethics (Islamic & Christian) </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

77.
UTILITARIANISM Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

78.
BASIC INSIGHTS OF UTILITARIANISM <ul><ul><li>The purpose of morality is to make the world a better place. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Morality is about producing good consequences, not having good intentions </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>We should do whatever will bring the most benefit (i.e., intrinsic value) to all of humanity. </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

79.
THE PURPOSE OF MORALITY <ul><ul><li>The utilitarian has a very simple answer to the question of why morality exists at all: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>The purpose of morality is to guide people’s actions in such a way as to produce a better world. </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Consequently, the emphasis in utilitarianism is on consequences , not intentions. </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

80.
FUNDAMENTAL IMPERATIVE <ul><ul><li>The fundamental imperative of utilitarianism is: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Always act in the way that will produce the greatest overall amount of good in the world. </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>The emphasis is clearly on consequences, not intentions. </li></ul></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

81.
THE EMPHASIS ON THE OVERALL GOOD <ul><ul><li>We often speak of “utilitarian” solutions in a disparaging tone, but in fact utilitarianism is a demanding moral position that often asks us to put aside self-interest for the sake of the whole. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Utilitarianism is a morally demanding position for two reasons: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>It always asks us to do the most , to maximize utility, not to do the minimum. </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>It asks us to set aside personal interest . </li></ul></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

82.
THE DREAM OF UTILITARIANISM: BRINGING SCIENTIFIC CERTAINTY TO ETHICS <ul><ul><li>Utilitarianism offers us a powerful vision of the moral life, one that promises to reduce or eliminate moral disagreement. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>If we can agree that the purpose of morality is to make the world a better place; and </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>If we can scientifically assess various possible courses of action to determine which will have the greatest positive effect on the world; then </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>We can provide a scientific answer to the question of what we ought to do. </li></ul></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

83.
INTRINSIC VALUE <ul><ul><li>Many things have instrumental value, that is, they have value as means to an end. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>However, there must be some things which are not merely instrumental, but have value in themselves. This is what we call intrinsic value. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>What has intrinsic value? Four principal candidates: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Pleasure </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Jeremy Bentham </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Happiness </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>John Stuart Mill </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Ideals </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>G. E. Moore </li></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Preferences </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Kenneth Arrow </li></ul></ul></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

84.
ACT AND RULE UTILITARIANISM <ul><ul><li>Act utilitarianism </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Looks at the consequences of each individual act and calculate utility each time the act is performed. </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Rule utilitarianism </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Looks at the consequences of having everyone follow a particular rule and calculates the overall utility of accepting or rejecting the rule. </li></ul></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

85.
AN EXAMPLE <ul><ul><li>Imagine the following scenario. A prominent and much-loved leader has been rushed to the hospital, grievously wounded by an assassin’s bullet. He needs a heart and lung transplant immediately to survive. No suitable donors are available, but there is a homeless person in the emergency room who is being kept alive on a respirator, who probably has only a few days to live, and who is a perfect donor. Without the transplant, the leader will die; the homeless person will die in a few days anyway. Security at the hospital is very well controlled. The transplant team could hasten the death of the homeless person and carry out the transplant without the public ever knowing that they killed the homeless person for his organs. What should they do? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>For rule utilitarians , this is an easy choice. No one could approve a general rule that lets hospitals kill patients for their organs when they are going to die anyway. The consequences of adopting such a general rule would be highly negative and would certainly undermine public trust in the medical establishment. </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>For act utilitarians , the situation is more complex. If secrecy were guaranteed, the overall consequences might be such that in this particular instance greater utility is produced by hastening the death of the homeless person and using his organs for the transplant. </li></ul></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

86.
CRITICISMS OF UTILITARIANISM Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010 <ul><ul><li>Responsibility </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Integrity </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Intentions </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Moral Luck </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Who does the calculating? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Who is included? </li></ul></ul>

87.
DEONTOLOGY Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

88.
THE ETHICS OF DUTY More than any other philosopher, Kant emphasized the way in which the moral life was centered on duty. Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

89.
DEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS (DUTY-BASED ETHICS) <ul><ul><li>Some say consequences are morally irrelevant </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Others say consequences are morally relevant but by themselves don’t determine the ethical nature of action </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Focus: rights and duties; permissible vs. mandatory actions </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Key questions: Are we treating cases similar in all morally relevant respects alike? Are we respecting persons? </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

90.
UNIVERSALIZABILITY AND THE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE <ul><li>Central insight: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>What is fair for one is fair for all </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

91.
LIVING BY RULES <ul><ul><li>Most of us live by rules much of the time. Some of these are what Kant called Categorical Imperatives—unconditional commands that are binding on everyone at all times. </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

92.
TYPES OF IMPERATIVES <ul><ul><li>Hypothetical Imperative: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>“ If you want to drive to Medani from Khartoum, take the Medani ‘highway’.” </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Structure: if…then… </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Categorical Imperative </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>“ Always tell the truth” </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Unconditional, applicable at all times </li></ul></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

93.
MAXIMS <ul><ul><li>Maxims, according to Kant, are subjective rules that guide action. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Relevant Act Description </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Sufficient Generality </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>All actions have maxims, such as, </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Never lie to your friends. </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Never act in a way that would make your parents ashamed of you. </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Always watch out for number one. </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>It’s ok to cheat if you need to. </li></ul></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

94.
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVES: <ul><ul><li>Universality: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>“ Always act in such a way that the maxim of your action can be willed as a universal law of humanity.” </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Respect </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>“ Always treat humanity, whether in yourself or in other people, as an end in itself and never as a mere means.” </li></ul></ul><ul><li>--Immanuel Kant </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Publicity: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Always act in such a way that you would not be embarrassed to have your actions described on the front page of The New York Times. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>--Probably not Bill Clinton </li></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

95.
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE: Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

96.
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVES: ANOTHER EXAMPLE <ul><ul><li>“ I know the questions to ask. It’s the answers I’m after. And what about learning how to live? Isn’t that philosophy too? What’s yours?” </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The reply had come easily but, she had thought, with honesty. “To get as much happiness as I can. Not to harm others. Not to whine. In that order.” </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Adam Dalgliesh, in reply to Kate Miskin’s question </li></ul><ul><li>P. D. James, A Certain Justice </li></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

97.
CLASSROOM EXERCISES <ul><ul><li>Most of us live by rules, obedience to which we take as a duty. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>What are the most important rules you live by? </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>What were the most important rules in your family? </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>What rules have you rejected as you have gotten older? </li></ul></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

98.
WHERE KANT MISSED THE MARK <ul><ul><li>The Neglect of Moral Integration </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>The person of duty can have deep and conflicting inclinations and this does not decrease moral worth—indeed, it seems to increase it in Kant’s eyes. </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The Role of Emotions </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>For Kant, the emotions are always suspect because they are fickle and causally determined and passive. </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The Place of Consequences in the Moral Life </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>In order to protect the moral life from the vicissitude of moral luck, Kant held a very strong position that refused to attach moral blame to individuals who were acting with good will, even though some indirect bad consequences could be forseen. </li></ul></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

99.
PRINCIPLISM <ul><li>Framework includes four clusters of moral principles for identifying and reflecting on moral problems: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Respect for autonomy (self-determination or self-governance) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Promote non-maleficence (avoiding harm) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Promote beneficence ( doing good) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Promote justice (treat people and groups fairly, including distributing resources fairly) </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

100.
VIRTUE-BASED ETHICS <ul><ul><li>Emphasizes moral character—not just moral action </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Focus: not simply to act morally </li></ul></ul><ul><li>but to be moral </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Key questions: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>what kind of life should I live? </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>what kind of person should I be? </li></ul></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

101.
FEMINIST ETHICS <ul><ul><li>oppression (of all people, in all its forms) is morally and politically unjust and must be addressed </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>social justice requires distributive justice plus fair relationships among social groups </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>the self is essentially a “self-in-relation” </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>autonomy should be a relational (rather than an individualistic) notion </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

102.
CASUISTRY (CASE-BASED REASONING) <ul><ul><li>“ bottom-up approach” </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>case comparison/analogy used toward ethical consensus </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>practical judgment in particular cases with appeal to precedent (“paradigm cases”) where possible </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010

103.
CASUISTRY: ASSESSMENT <ul><li>Strengths: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>contextual approach recognizes each case is unique </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Limitations: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>conflicting case analogies, judgments, interpretations </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>facts of case themselves can’t yield ethical judgments </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>appeal to precedent assumes we got it right in the past—how do we know? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>no method to prevent biased account of case or one that neglects relevant features </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>“ lacks critical distance from cultural blindness, rash analogy, and mere popular opinion” (B&C 395) </li></ul></ul>Ghaiath Ethics in Public Health (JPCMFM) Jan.2010