What is Knowledge Management 2.0? | Enterprise 2.0 Blogs Page 1 of 2
about communities faqs aiim.org contact us
Enterprise 2.0 community Welcome: Rich Blank Logout
ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT ENTERPRISE COLLABORATION
What is Knowledge Management 2.0?
By Rich Blank (/users/sharepointpmp) at Sun, 07/18/2010 - 18:24
Managing Consultant for NouvEON Consulting www.nouveon.com
Knowledge Management seems to be making a come back. Like
E2.0 or Web 2.0, KM 2.0 seems to be more about aggregating
unstructured information with structured data (perhaps in a
community, portal, team space, etc…).
Perhaps the explosion of applications like SharePoint have once
again made organizations think about how to manage knowledge
more effectively and invest time and money into related
Subscribe to RSS (/e20/users/305/blogs.xml)
projects. While there is a promise that platforms like
SharePoint will “do it all”, organizations have to move beyond Follow me on Twitter (http://www.twitter.com/@sharepointpmp)
simple document sharing and leverage these all-inclusive
technology platforms as a collaboration system before it can be considered a system of knowledge. Users need to
make the application part of their day-to-day as much as they live in their email inbox. And administrators and
managers of Knowledge/Information Management systems must ensure they provide the right balance of
governance, tweaking/development, care/feeding, and obtain the right consulting guidance to optimize the ROI and
ensure users view the technology as a productivity tool that enables them to get their jobs done better, faster, and
cheaper….. Then complete eco-systems (e.g. from IBM, Oracle, or Microsoft) can work very very well for
communications, collaboration, community, and knowledge in large organization (both inside and outside the
firewall). However, for traditional ECM/RM or larger knowledge management efforts like digital libraries or e-
Commerce driven websites, these all-in-one platforms just may not be the best fit (esp. in larger organizations).
The challenges most organizations face with Knowledge Management are the cost of ownership, too many
repositories, different taxonomies, and too many places to search. What we see today is really not any different than
back in the 80s/early 90s with companies having 3,4, or 5 different email systems….and they realized they needed to
standardize on 1 email system (novell, exchange, or notes generally).
While it seems most organizations finally have a solid handle on email systems some 10-15 years later, they need to
now focus on information & knowledge management. These systems are not well governed and users inside the
organization expect a Google-like experience in spite of all these challenges. Organizations have simply created an
“information mess” in a rush to the web over the last decade. As a result, collaboration remains difficult and KM
becomes even more challenging. No doubt KM 2.0 initiatives will fail today just like in KM 1.0 unless these same
organizations think more holistically in their approach.
There is a tremendous economic benefit attempting to cleanup and consolidate different ECM systems into a single
vendor platform (for the 80%) with a consistent and enterprise information architecture that organizes collaboration,
information, and knowledge. While I don’t think 1 system will do everything required by the business, 80% is pretty
good … while the remaining 20% might require a more unique/tailored technology solution (be it open source or a
more pricey ECM solution).
What is Knowledge Management 2.0? | Enterprise 2.0 Blogs Page 2 of 2
• Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
• Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
More information about formatting options (/e20/filter/tips)
This post and comment(s) reflect the personal perspectives of community members, and not necessarily those of
their employers or of AIIM International