The Toulmin Model of Argument

4,737 views

Published on

1 Comment
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Essay writing is one of the important one. It have a proper structure and writing rules also. an essay writing provides a complete details about a topic in a proper manner. Essay origin is one of the best essay writing service that helps to know about the purpose of the essay writing. It's called DigitalEssay.net Good luck!
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
No Downloads
Views
Total views
4,737
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
126
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
70
Comments
1
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

The Toulmin Model of Argument

  1. 1. The Toulmin Model of Argument White and Billings
  2. 2. Toulmin Basics <ul><li>Toulmin’s model is systematic in its reasoning; at the same time, it demands that this reasoning be scrutinized for its ethical underpinnings. </li></ul><ul><li>http://changingminds.org/disciplines/argument/making_argument/toulmin.htm </li></ul>
  3. 3. Toulmin Model <ul><li>Claim </li></ul><ul><li>Data </li></ul><ul><li>Warrant </li></ul><ul><li>Backing </li></ul><ul><li>Qualifier </li></ul><ul><li>Rebuttal </li></ul>
  4. 4. Claim The assertion I shall try to persuade you to accept as true with or without qualifiers Data/Grounds The facts and/or logical reasons that demonstrate the truth of my claim Warrant Assurance that the data is based on solid principles, thus contributing to the validity & trustworthiness of the claim Backing Assurance that the warrant is sound
  5. 5. Claim <ul><li>Suggests a thesis or assertion is particularly open to challenge </li></ul><ul><li>Cannot dispute taste </li></ul><ul><li>Objective claim </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Assert that something actually exists and present evidence that is demonstrably factual </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Subjective Claim </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Assert that something should exist and present evidence derived from ethical, moral, or aesthetic convictions. </li></ul></ul>
  6. 6. Data (grounds) <ul><li>The supporting evidence fully validates the claim </li></ul><ul><li>Five kinds of data </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Legal </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Scientific </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Testimonial or experiential (clear demonstrations) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Scholarly or documentary </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Statistical </li></ul></ul>
  7. 7. The Warrant and its Backing <ul><li>The assurance that the evidence brought in to support the claim is completely reliable and that it rests on sound principles or values </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Logical or scientific </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Ethical or forensic-based </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Emotional or artistic based </li></ul></ul><ul><li>The backing is the assurance that the warrant is sound </li></ul><ul><li>Even if the warrant remains unstated, the writer should know what it is, in order to determine if the reader shares those values </li></ul>
  8. 8. The Qualifier <ul><li>Claim may be valid in many circumstances but not all </li></ul><ul><li>used so that all readers would understand how the writer is limiting its range </li></ul><ul><li>Rebuttal </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Similar to Refutation, except </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Aims not to invalidate the claim but to show that the claim may not be valid in certain situations </li></ul></ul>
  9. 9. Example <ul><li>Claim: Carol should be elected class president </li></ul><ul><li>Grounds: Carol is an honor student </li></ul><ul><li>Warrant: A person who is an honor student is honorable and hard-working. </li></ul>
  10. 10. Exercise 4.1 <ul><li>Question 1 </li></ul>
  11. 11. Exercise 4.2 <ul><li>Questions 1 </li></ul><ul><ul><li>1 qualifier </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Two kinds of evidence </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>1 warrant </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Counterclaim, Counterdata, and counter warrant </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>3, 4, 5 </li></ul></ul>
  12. 12. Exercise 4.3 <ul><li>Claim: </li></ul><ul><li>Data: </li></ul><ul><li>Warrant: </li></ul><ul><li>Backing: </li></ul><ul><li>Qualifier? </li></ul><ul><li>Rebuttal? </li></ul>
  13. 13. Exercise 4.3 Answers (In a nutshell) <ul><li>Claim: King George III deserves no loyalty </li></ul><ul><li>Data: King George III is a tyrannical ruler </li></ul><ul><li>Warrant: Tyrannical Rulers deserve no loyalty </li></ul><ul><li>Backing: </li></ul><ul><li>Qualifier? </li></ul><ul><li>Rebuttal? </li></ul>
  14. 14. Toulmin Essay Format <ul><li>I. Introduction: </li></ul><ul><li>a. First Example </li></ul><ul><li>b. Second Example </li></ul><ul><li>c. Claim, with allusions to underlying warrants. </li></ul><ul><li>II. Data in support of the claim </li></ul><ul><li>a. Scientific Data </li></ul><ul><li>b. Testimonial Data </li></ul><ul><li>III. Deeper Considerations (warrants & backing) behind claim </li></ul><ul><li>IV. Concluding Remarks </li></ul>

×