Planitulsa Additional Indicators 50909v2

597 views

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
597
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
382
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Planitulsa Additional Indicators 50909v2

  1. 1. Additional Scenario Indicators May, 2009
  2. 2. Scenario Indicators This presentation includes additional indicators from the four PLANiTulsa scenarios presented at Cain’s Ballroom on May 12, 2009 These are intended to provide additional detail for residents interested in delving deeper into the scenarios. Please, take some time to review them, and then complete the survey!
  3. 3. People Scenarios C and D have the most population growth, Scenario A the least. New Population Growth in the City 600,000 102,333 100,966 72,919 500,000 28,628 400,000 Total Population Added 300,000 2000 Population 200,000 100,000 0 A B C D
  4. 4. People Scenarios C and D also have the greatest new job growth. New Job Growth in the City 23,859 32,620 41,700 42,183 400,000 350,000 300,000 250,000 Total Jobs Added 200,000 2000 Jobs 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 A B C D
  5. 5. People Scenarios B and D would place the greatest number of new homes on underutilized parcels New Infill Housing Units (and % of total) 56% 25,000 20,000 49% Infill Housing 15,000 Units 10,000 14% 5,000 4% 0 A B C D
  6. 6. People Each scenario provides a range of new homes on different sized lots. Variety of Single Family Home Types 14,000 12,000 10,000 Single Family Rural Single Family Estate 8,000 Single Family 8-15K lot 6,000 Single Family 5-8K lot Cottage Home 4,000 2,000 0 A B C D
  7. 7. People Scenarios C and D have most new homes in mixed-use areas, with shops nearby. Proportion of Housing Units In A Mixed-Use Environment 100% 74% 75% Percent of 49% 50% Units 27% 25% 8% 0% A B C D
  8. 8. Economy The types of jobs added were similar across all four scenarios. Job Profile 100% 14% 15% 15% 90% 21% 80% 70% 60% Retail 61% 60% 60% 58% 50% Office Industrial 40% 30% 20% 25% 25% 25% 21% 10% 0% A B C D
  9. 9. Economy Scenario C would result in the greatest total value of new homes and employment space. Value of Total New Construction $14,000,000,000 $12,000,000,000 $10,000,000,000 Value Added $8,000,000,000 from All Construction $6,000,000,000 $4,000,000,000 $2,000,000,000 $0 A B C D
  10. 10. Economy The estimated increase in annual sales tax revenue for the city is similar across B, C, and D Added City Sales Tax Revenue $50,000,000 $40,000,000 $30,000,000 $20,000,000 $10,000,000 $0 A B C D
  11. 11. Transportation Scenario A would result in more total lane miles than the others. New Lane-Miles of Road Constructed 2,500 2,000 Added Lane- 604 504 454 434 Miles 1,500 Existing Lane- 1,000 Miles 1,526 1,526 1,526 1,526 500 0 A B C D
  12. 12. Transportation On per-capita basis, Scenario A would require more new roads for fewer new residents. Lane Miles of New Road Per 1,000 New Residents 25 21.1 20 Lane Miles 15 Added per 1,000 New Residents 10 6.9 4.5 4.2 5 0 A B C D
  13. 13. Transportation Scenarios B, C, and D would result in Tulsans driving fewer miles than Scenario A. Per Capita Vehicle Miles Traveled (City) 40 40 33 31 30 30 VMT per capita (miles) 20 10 0 A B C D
  14. 14. Transportation The amount of time Tulsans will spend in the car drops dramatically in Scenarios B, C and D. Per Capita Vehicle Hours Traveled (City) 60 56 46 50 45 41 40 VHT per capita 30 (Min) 20 10 0 A B C D
  15. 15. Transportation Scenarios B and D would result in the least amount of fuel wasted due to traffic congestion Gallons of Fuel Wasted Annually Due to Congestion 10,730,000 9,420,000 10,290,000 10,000,000 8,760,000 7,500,000 Gallons of Fuel Wasted Annually 5,000,000 2,500,000 0 A B C D
  16. 16. Transportation Scenarios B and D would result in the least amount of lost time due to traffic congestion. Citywide Value of Time Lost Due to Congestion (Annually, in millions) $400 $346 $332 $304 $283 $300 Value of Time $200 Lost (per year) $100 $0 A B C D
  17. 17. Community & Environment Scenario C would consume the greatest amount of land, overall. Acres of Land Consumed (% that is on underutilized parcels) 8% 10,000 8,000 Underutilized 3% land 6,000 26% 35% Vacant Acres 4,000 2,000 0 A B C D
  18. 18. Community & Environment The number of new residents living near parks, the river, and open space is different for each scenario. New Housing Units within ½ Mile of Open Space
  19. 19. Community & Environment Scenario C produced the greatest amount of new impervious surface such as parking lots and rooftops. Acres of Impervious Surface Added 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 A B C D

×