Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Naval Aviation Materials and Manufacturing Workshop: Accelerating Technology Insertion

1,903 views

Published on

The purpose of the workshop was to identify the means of effecting a 30% reduction in cost and a 30% increase in throughput, by accelerating the insertion of extant and emerging Materials and Manufacturing Technologies.

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Naval Aviation Materials and Manufacturing Workshop: Accelerating Technology Insertion

  1. 1. Naval Aviation Materials and Manufacturing Workshop: Accelerating Technology Insertion Air Vehicle Engineering Department Naval Air Systems Command William E. Frazier, Ph.D 30-31 Jan 2008 Southern Maryland Higher Education Center California MD
  2. 2. Workshop Focus Effect a 30% reduction in cost and a 30% increase in throughput, by accelerating the insertion of extant and emerging Materials and Manufacturing Technologies. We tasked the workshop participants to assist us in developing a path to the answer.
  3. 3. Outline <ul><li>Overview </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Organizers, Chairpersons, and Plenary Speakers </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Concept of Operation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Participants </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Results </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Plenary: Technology Needs Summary </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Green Manufacturing </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Modeling and Simulation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Rapid Prototyping </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Repair Technologies </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Transition Hurdles </li></ul></ul>
  4. 4. Workshop Organizers <ul><li>Organizers </li></ul><ul><li>ARL Penn State </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Dr. Tom Donnellan </li></ul></ul><ul><li>NAVAIR </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Dr. William E. Frazier </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Dr. Eui Lee </li></ul></ul><ul><li>NAVMAR </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Mr. Irv Shaffer </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Dr. Jeff Waldman </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Navy Metalworking Center(NMC) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Ms. Denise Piastrelli </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Dr. Daniel Winterscheidt </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Chairpersons </li></ul><ul><li>Rapid Prototyping </li></ul><ul><ul><li>George Blasiole, Navy Metalworking Center </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Dr. Eui Lee, NAVAIR PAX Materials </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Repair Technologies </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Robert Kestler, NAVAIR CP 4.0T </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Timothy D. Bair, ARL Penn State </li></ul></ul><ul><li>  Green Manufacturing </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Jose Jimenez, Ind. Compliance Dept. FRCSW </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Michele Pok, NAVAIR PAX Materials </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Ray Paulson, FRCSW </li></ul></ul><ul><li>  Modeling and Simulation </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Dr. Tom Donnellan, ARL Penn State </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Mark Traband, ARL Penn State </li></ul></ul><ul><li>  Transition Hurdles </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Dr. Jeff Waldman, NAVMAR </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Brian Riso, VLCOE CP </li></ul></ul>
  5. 5. Plenary Speakers <ul><li>Mr. Richard Gilpin , NAVAIR AIR-4.3 Director, Air Vehicle Engineering Department </li></ul><ul><li>Mr. John Johns , Deputy Commander Fleet Readiness Centers </li></ul><ul><li>Mr. Thomas Laux , Program Executive Officer Air, ASW, Assault and Special Mission Programs </li></ul><ul><li>Mr. Todd Mellon , NAVAIR AIR-6.7 Director, Industrial & Logistics Maintenance Planning / Sustainment </li></ul><ul><li>Col. David Smith , Commanding Officer FRC East </li></ul><ul><li>Mr. Greg Kilchenstein , Senior Sustainment Technology Policy Analyst, OSD(AT&L) </li></ul><ul><li>Mr. John Carney , Director, Navy ManTech Program, Office of Naval Research </li></ul>
  6. 6. Aligned S&T Approach <ul><li>Sea Power 21 </li></ul><ul><li>NAE S&T Strategic Plan (July 2006) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Safety and Affordability Enablers (SAE) Capability Gap, STO-3 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) Capability Gap, STO-2 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Safety and Affordability Enablers (SAE) Capability Gap, STO-2 </li></ul></ul><ul><li>NAVAIR Vision </li></ul><ul><li>PEO(A) Rotorcraft Needs </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Corrosion, Erosion, and Environmental Degradation were identified as major O&S critical issues </li></ul></ul>
  7. 7. Working Group CONOPS <ul><li>Five Discussion Groups </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Green Manufacturing </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Modeling & Simulation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Rapid Prototyping </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Repair Technologies </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Transition Hurdles </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Led by Facilitator </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Selected audience (~20) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Guided the discussion </li></ul></ul>GOAL TECHNICAL OBJECTIVES TECHNICAL CHALLENGES RESEARCH APPROACHES GOTChA Process Navy Defined Navy Defined, Workshop Validated Workshop Developed <ul><li>Prioritized list of technologies </li></ul><ul><li>Viable approaches listed and prioritized for the near, mid, and far term. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>< 5yrs; 5-10 yrs; > 10 yrs </li></ul></ul>
  8. 8. Product Generation Plenary Working Groups Idea Generation & Prioritization Post Workshop Analysis & Synthesis Technical Needs, Challenges, and Approaches
  9. 9. <ul><li>Group output was consensus of experts </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Industry, Government, Academia </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Validated list of technical objectives </li></ul><ul><li>For each Objective, specific challenges were defined </li></ul><ul><li>For each challenge, potential technology approaches were proposed </li></ul>Working Group Outputs
  10. 10. Attendance <ul><li>Engaged discussion with 97 technical experts </li></ul>Government Industry Industry Academia <ul><li>Air Force </li></ul><ul><li>ARMY </li></ul><ul><li>DARPA </li></ul><ul><li>JSF </li></ul><ul><li>NIST </li></ul><ul><li>OSD </li></ul><ul><li>ONR </li></ul><ul><li>PEO(A) </li></ul><ul><li>NAVAIR </li></ul><ul><li>FRC </li></ul><ul><li>3M Aerospace </li></ul><ul><li>ALCOA Defense </li></ul><ul><li>Battelle Memorial Institute </li></ul><ul><li>Bell Helicopter </li></ul><ul><li>Boeing </li></ul><ul><li>Carpenter Technology </li></ul><ul><li>CTC </li></ul><ul><li>Dynamics Research Corp </li></ul><ul><li>GE Aviation </li></ul><ul><li>JENTEK </li></ul><ul><li>KBSI </li></ul><ul><li>Lockheed Martin </li></ul><ul><li>METBLAST </li></ul><ul><li>NanoTechLabs </li></ul><ul><li>NAVMAR </li></ul><ul><li>Navy Metalworking Center </li></ul><ul><li>Northrop Grumman </li></ul><ul><li>Spatial Integrated Systems </li></ul><ul><li>Sikorsky </li></ul><ul><li>Stratasys </li></ul><ul><li>TRI </li></ul><ul><li>Maven Group </li></ul><ul><li>Connecticut Center for Advanced Technology </li></ul><ul><li>Craven Community College </li></ul><ul><li>Georgia Institute of Technology </li></ul><ul><li>Institute for Maintenance Science & Technology , NC State Univ. </li></ul><ul><li>North Carolina State University </li></ul><ul><li>Penn State University </li></ul><ul><li>Purdue University </li></ul><ul><li>University of Virginia </li></ul>
  11. 11. Plenary Synopsis ( Technology Needs) <ul><li>Diagnostics and Testing </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Advanced NDI and automated testing </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Environmentally Sage Designs / Processes </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Replacement for cadmium and chromium plating processes </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Alternate primer coatings eliminating hexavalent chrome . </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Reverse Engineering </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Ability to establish technical data package and replacement part in the absence of technical data </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Convert legacy 2D data to 3D data for computer-aided manufacturing. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Predictive Maintenance </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Real-time infrastructure and technology to support knowledge-based maintenance decisions. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Advanced Coatings </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Resist corrosion & erosion degradation. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Knowledge-based parts location capability </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Ability to actively locate any asset at any time </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Distance Support </li></ul><ul><ul><li>High-Speed Voice Over Internet Protocol and high-resolution video. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Lightweight materials </li></ul><ul><li>Mobile forward-based maintenance </li></ul><ul><li>Aircraft Battle Damage Repair (ABDR) – Key Enabler </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Develop portable, battle damage repair and rapid manufacturing technologies. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The ability to repair battle damage with minimal external support </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>ABDR manuals </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Readiness Modeling </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Tools for reliability, sparing, and total ownership cost </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Cost Wise Readiness Integrated Improvement Program (CWRIIP ) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Evaluating Advanced Total Life-Cycle Assessment Software Tool (ATLCAST) </li></ul></ul>
  12. 12. Plenary Synopsis ( Technology Needs) <ul><li>Composite Technologies </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Improved characterization in dynamic environment </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Enhance producibility and reduce variability </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Critically examine composite qualification requirements for cost-reduction opportunities. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Articulate ROI based upon mission performance enhancements (due to weight reductions). </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Rapid Prototyping </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Blade Repair </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Repair Technologies </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Corrosion Repair </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>HVOF WCCo </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Composite Repair </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Corrosion </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Design in corrosion resistance </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Corrosion smart designs </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Manufacturing </li></ul><ul><ul><li>High Speed Machining of titanium </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Gears </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Design with repair in mind. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Common Themes </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Microstructural processing & modeling </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Modeling & Simulation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Computational methods </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Improved Structural fatigue analysis techniques </li></ul><ul><li>Maintenance repair data (Material Condition Assessment) </li></ul><ul><li>Depot Maintenance (Schedule and Cost) </li></ul>
  13. 13. Green Manufacturing <ul><li>Goal: Effect a 30% reduction in cost and 30% increase in through put, by accelerating the insertion of extant and emerging Environmentally Friendly Manufacturing Technologies </li></ul><ul><li>Objectives: </li></ul><ul><li>Increase the paint application rate 50% over the current baseline and reduce the Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) costs 30% or more. </li></ul><ul><li>Increase the rate of paint removal 25% over the existing baseline rate. Lower the solid waste (blast media) and industrial waste (chemical stripper rinse water) costs associated with Navy aircraft de-painting 50% </li></ul><ul><li>Reduce the defects 95% for metal finishing applications (e.g., hard chrome plating etc.) and reduce the Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) costs 30% or more. </li></ul>
  14. 14. Green Manufacturing <ul><li>Non-Chrome Primer (5-10 yrs) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Hexavalent chrome is toxic and carcinogenic </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Non-chrome primers have not demonstrated acceptable corrosion results </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Environmentally Friendly Chemical Stripper (5-10 yrs) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Existing environmentally friendly stripper systems (benzyl alcohol based) work too slowly. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Other strippers cause corrosion. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Rapid cure polyurethane (5-10 yrs) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Top coats can require up to 7 days to cure. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Pot life is too short. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Powder Coating & De-coating Process (1-5 yrs) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Coatings must be applied at high temperatures (350-400F) which can cause damage to the substrate. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Coatings are tenacious and are not easily removable with chemical stripper alone. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Chrome Plating Alternatives (1-5yrs) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>HVOF </li></ul></ul>
  15. 15. Green Manufacturing Needs (Less than 5 years) <ul><li>Can be done immediately </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Training – Video depicting proper painting methods </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Implementation of Non Cr Conversion Coating </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Recycle Waste Water </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Could be implemented in less that 5 Years </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Painting technology </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Plural Component Paint System </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Facility Needs: Reduce Make-up Air from 100% to 20% </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>De-painting Technologies </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Bio Blast, Barrier Coating, Powder Coat De-painting, Zirconium Blast </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Chrome Plating Technology and Alternatives </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Conforming Anodes </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Process Controller </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Insulate and Cover All Plating Rinse Tanks </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Separate Dry On-Off Air Controls for Each Tank </li></ul></ul></ul>
  16. 16. Modeling and Simulation <ul><li>Goal: Effect a 30% reduction in cost and 30% increase in through put, by accelerating the insertion of extant and emerging Modeling and Simulation Technologies </li></ul><ul><li>Objectives: </li></ul><ul><li>Reduce the time and cost associated with developing work content/profile estimates for manufacturing and repair processes by 75% while increasing the accuracy of initial estimates by 25% </li></ul><ul><li>Reduce production line work in process (WIP) by 50% and increase throughput by 25% over the baseline process. </li></ul><ul><li>Reduce the time required to plan and implement proposed changes for manufacturing, repair, overhaul, or warehousing by 50%, with increased confidence. </li></ul>
  17. 17. Modeling and Simulation <ul><li>Generation of 3D models and associated meta-data from paper & raster legacy designs. (10 yrs) </li></ul><ul><li>Automatic generation of simulation models from standard data formats (5-10 yrs.) is needed to ensure models maintain currency with changing product configurations </li></ul><ul><ul><li>No standard input format is available for discrete event simulation models. Such formats are needed to create and update models. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Develop discrete event modeling tools that can take this standard input and automatically generate functional, accurate models form the data. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Develop methods to assess the impact of platform condition & history on repair work content. (5-10 yrs.) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>The work content required for a component, system, or end item is highly dependent upon its condition upon induction. The challenge is to develop tools to better capture the operating history of an item. </li></ul></ul>
  18. 18. Modeling and Simulation <ul><li>Repair and Overhaul engineering information must be consistent and adequate in level of detail. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>As process capabilities change, semi-automatically regenerate repair instructions (5-10 yrs) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Create an interactive, collaborative environment between engineering and manufacturing / planning (5yrs) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Affordable, easy to use, maintainable tools for developing on-demand, richer work instruction content. (5 yrs) </li></ul><ul><li>Tools to analyze existing & historical usage data and lead time data and use results to improve part availability. (5 yrs) </li></ul><ul><li>Develop data mining & statistical analysis tools for creation of process models.(5 yrs) </li></ul>
  19. 19. Rapid Prototyping Technology <ul><li>Goal: Effect a 30% reduction in cost and 30% increase in through put, by accelerating the insertion of extant and emerging Rapid Prototyping </li></ul><ul><li>Objectives: </li></ul><ul><li>Cut procurement time (from need to part in inventory) by 50% with no sacrifice in geometry accuracy or properties for fatigue and non-fatigue. (Produce parts with least process steps and human intervention from &quot;art to part.&quot; Fully integrate and automate RP processes). </li></ul><ul><li>Identify 5 components for repair using material additive processing that will reduce replacement cost by 60% </li></ul><ul><li>Provide for the production of aerospace components using Rapid Prototyping processes through the development of standard/general qualification procedures for all aerospace structural and propulsion components that are candidates for manufacture by RP processes. </li></ul>
  20. 20. Rapid Prototyping Technology <ul><li>Direct Digital Manufacturing (DDM) </li></ul><ul><li>Identified as the most promising technology to achieve cost and time savings. </li></ul><ul><li>There are a variety of DDM processes including Selected Laser Sintering (SLS), Laser Engineered Net Shapes (LENS), Solid Freeform Fabrication (SFF), and Electron Beam Melting (EBM). </li></ul><ul><li>Permits components to be fabricated directly from digital media, e.g., CAD/CAM files. </li></ul><ul><li>Two DDM focus areas were identified </li></ul><ul><li>Direct Digital Manufacturing (DDM) process of Non-metallic Component Manufacture </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Low quantity non-metallic components that are non-stock, non inventory parts such as seals and gaskets or special purpose parts made of plastics or elastomers </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Direct Digital Manufacturing (DDM) process of Metallic Components </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Applications include low volume, high value parts; components that are no longer manufactured, repaired and refurbished; and new design prototypes. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Systemic Technology Needs </li></ul><ul><li>DDM modeling and simulation to relate processing to microstructure to properties. </li></ul><ul><li>Non-destructive Evaluation methods and tools, e.g., microporosity </li></ul><ul><li>A DDM Qualification and Certification Methodology which eliminates the need for component by component certification. </li></ul><ul><li>Improved equipment reliability and reproducibility </li></ul>
  21. 21. Rapid Prototyping Technology Needs <ul><li>DDM of Metallic Materials </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Gear “teeth” refurbishment (5-10 yrs) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Single crystal blade repair (5-10 yrs) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Blade and vane length recovery (0-5 yrs) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Housing repair. (0-5 yrs) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>DDM of Non-metallic components </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Gaskets and Polymeric seals (0-5 yrs) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Carbon fiber reinforced (0-5 yrs) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Standard Engineering Process Specification and Joint Qualification Standards (5-10 yrs) </li></ul><ul><li>Equipment Reliability and Repeatability (0-5 yrs) </li></ul><ul><li>NDE (0-5 yrs) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>micro-porosity, acceptance criteria </li></ul></ul>
  22. 22. Repair Technology <ul><li>Goal: Effect a 30% reduction in cost and 30% increase in throughput, by accelerating the insertion of extant and emerging Repair Technologies </li></ul><ul><li>Objectives: </li></ul><ul><li>Implement structural repair technologies that will increase throughput by 100% </li></ul><ul><li>Implement technology to improve / achieve material state awareness at an annual cost savings of 50% </li></ul><ul><li>Implement corrosion control technologies that will double the time between required maintenance intervals and reduce maintenance cost by 50% </li></ul>
  23. 23. Repair Technology <ul><li>Additive Material Restoration (10 yrs) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Use of DDM and other techniques to repair and restore structural components </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Damage assessment (10 yrs) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Smart coatings for corrosion and fatigue damage (10 yrs) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>NDI technologies for inspection through coatings and/or multiple structural layers (5-10 yrs) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>State of health determination (10 yrs) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Modeling and data interpretation / damage assessment </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Condition based maintenance (CBM) technologies </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Wide area sensing for structural health determination. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Alternative Coating Systems (5-10 yrs) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>HVOF, Cold Spray, Cladding Alternatives. </li></ul></ul>
  24. 24. Transition Hurdles <ul><li>Goal: Effect a 30% reduction in cost and a 30% increase in throughput by significant decreases in the non-technical hurdles to technology insertion </li></ul><ul><li>Objectives: </li></ul><ul><li>Improve processes that could increase technology insertion by 50%. </li></ul><ul><li>Assure that 100% of the efforts needed to insert technologies are properly resourced </li></ul><ul><li>Reduce the time associated with the qualification, certification and insertion of new technologies by 80%. </li></ul>
  25. 25. Transition Hurdles <ul><li>There is a lack of visibility into the current processes, policies, and funding mechanisms being used to develop, qualify, and implement new cost saving maintenance technologies. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Establish an NAE policy and integrated NAE process for technology insertion into the maintenance environment. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Establish and properly resource a technology transition program manager. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>The process of qualifying and certifying new technologies is unclear, cumbersome, and costly. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>A clearly defined processes are needed in which certification requirements are fully developed up-front. </li></ul></ul>
  26. 26. Transition Hurdles (Individual Working Groups Input) <ul><li>Green Manufacturing </li></ul><ul><li>Lack of funding and funding gaps related to a) funding cycle, b) color of funding and c) CIP threshold </li></ul><ul><li>Engineering Approval Process </li></ul><ul><li>Technical Manual Changes </li></ul><ul><li>Environmental and Safety Laws and Regulations </li></ul><ul><li>Public Affairs (public perception) </li></ul><ul><li>Facility Logistics (infrastructure availability)/Equipment Readiness </li></ul><ul><li>Training (knowledge, skills and abilities) </li></ul><ul><li>Modeling and Simulation </li></ul><ul><li>Lack of training, time, and funding </li></ul><ul><li>Lack of engineering talent with industrial and manufacturing experience. Engineer are too removed from the realities of depot and manufacturing environment. </li></ul><ul><li>Lack of cost-based data and metrics supporting M&S implementation </li></ul><ul><li>Long development times and extended acquisition cycle </li></ul><ul><li>DMS obsolescence </li></ul>
  27. 27. Transition Hurdles (Individual Working Groups Input) <ul><li>Rapid Prototyping </li></ul><ul><li>The lack of an effective rapid prototyping qualification process. </li></ul><ul><li>The price and availability for single part replacements related to the economics of material quantities, tooling, set up, and production scheduling. </li></ul><ul><li>The cost and time associated with multiple sourced contracting for scanning, modeling, and manufacture. </li></ul><ul><li>Availability of OEM data and the need to protect proprietary data </li></ul><ul><li>Vendor certification </li></ul><ul><li>Technical data exchange </li></ul><ul><li>Repair Technologies </li></ul><ul><li>Resources for equipment and equipment installation and facility modifications </li></ul><ul><li>Training (Fleet & Depot personnel) </li></ul><ul><li>Technical Instruction Changes </li></ul><ul><li>Intransient internal culture (We’ve been doing this for years…) </li></ul><ul><li>Logistics of implementation (Configuration Control of affected parts/systems) </li></ul><ul><li>OEM resistance and impediments </li></ul><ul><li>Performance based logistics contracts </li></ul><ul><li>Information Technology not allowing </li></ul>
  28. 28. Actions and Recommendations <ul><li>Initiate two AirSpeed Projects based on issues identified in the Non-technical Transition Hurdles Working Group </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Technology insertion project should be jointly sponsored by the CTO and FRC. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The Qualification & Certification project should be sponsored by the CTO with full participation by 4.3 and 4.4. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Focus Command resources on the high payoff technologies identified in the working groups, for example </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Direct Digital Manufacturing </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Condition Based Maintenance (CBM) and damage assessment technologies </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Non-Chrome primers, environmentally friendly strippers, and rapid cure polyurethane paints. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>3D model generation from legacy data; methods to assess work content based upon platform condition and history </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Gear tooth repair; single crystal blade repair; transmission housing repair; blade and vein repair. </li></ul></ul>
  29. 29. Path Forward <ul><li>Continue post workshop analysis </li></ul><ul><li>Brief Stakeholders </li></ul><ul><li>Write and disseminate report </li></ul><ul><li>Advocate AirSpeed Projects for Non-technical Transition Hurdles </li></ul><ul><li>Pursue sponsorship for high payoff technologies. </li></ul>

×