29 junio 11
Maniobra de Hamilton                       ¿Evidencia?
Boulvain M, Stan CM, Irion O. Membrane sweeping for induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005,Issu...
Bricker L, Luckas M. Amniotomy alone for induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2000, Issue 4.Art. N...
Conclusiones de los autores   De acuerdo con los resultados de esta revisión, no es posible recomendar la introducción de ...
Howarth G, Botha DJ. Amniotomy plus intravenous oxytocin for induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Syste-matic Reviews...
Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM, Pileggi C. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.Cochrane Database ...
Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM, Pileggi C. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.Cochrane Database ...
Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM, Pileggi C. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.Cochrane Database ...
Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM, Pileggi C. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.Cochrane Database ...
Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM, Pileggi C. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.Cochrane Database ...
Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM, Pileggi C. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.Cochrane Database ...
Kavanagh J, Kelly AJ, Thomas J. Breast stimulation for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database ofSyst...
MADRID, 21 Jun.
Embriotoxicidad                               del     misoprostol                                                         ...
Evidence Report/Technology Assessment Number 176. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor.Agency for...
Evidence Report/Technology Assessment Number 176. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor.Agency for...
Evidence Report/Technology Assessment Number 176. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor.Agency for...
Evidence Report/Technology Assessment Number 176. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor.Agency for...
EAC             OR               95% CI                          P        Ingreso a la UCIN                           3   ...
Evidence Report/Technology Assessment Number 176. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor.Agency for...
Evidence Report/Technology Assessment Number 176. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor.Agency for...
.
Bahn SA, Jacobson J, Petersen F(Obstet Gynecol. ©1998 Sep;92(3):403-7)
Bahn SA, Jacobson J, Petersen F(Obstet Gynecol. ©1998 Sep;92(3):403-7)
Todos somos muy ignorantes.Lo que ocurre es que no todosignoramos las mismas cosas.
Inducción del trabajo de parto y resultados neonatales
Inducción del trabajo de parto y resultados neonatales
Inducción del trabajo de parto y resultados neonatales
Inducción del trabajo de parto y resultados neonatales
Inducción del trabajo de parto y resultados neonatales
Inducción del trabajo de parto y resultados neonatales
Inducción del trabajo de parto y resultados neonatales
Inducción del trabajo de parto y resultados neonatales
Inducción del trabajo de parto y resultados neonatales
Inducción del trabajo de parto y resultados neonatales
Inducción del trabajo de parto y resultados neonatales
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Inducción del trabajo de parto y resultados neonatales

1,742 views

Published on

Inducción del trabajo de parto y resultados neonatales
Inducing labor and neonatal outcomes

Published in: Health & Medicine, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,742
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
35
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Inducción del trabajo de parto y resultados neonatales

  1. 1. 29 junio 11
  2. 2. Maniobra de Hamilton ¿Evidencia?
  3. 3. Boulvain M, Stan CM, Irion O. Membrane sweeping for induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005,Issue 1. Art. No.: CD000451. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011 Issue 6, Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Colla-boration.
  4. 4. Bricker L, Luckas M. Amniotomy alone for induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2000, Issue 4.Art. No.: CD002862. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011 Issue 6, Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration.
  5. 5. Conclusiones de los autores De acuerdo con los resultados de esta revisión, no es posible recomendar la introducción de la amniotomía sistemática co- mo parte del tratamiento y el cuidado durante el trabajo de parto. Se recomienda que las pruebas presentadas en esta re- visión estén disponibles para las mujeres a quienes se les ofrece la amniotomía, y podrían resultar útiles como base para la discusión, y para las decisiones tomadas entre las pacientes y los cuidadores.Smyth RMD, Alldred SK, Markham C. Amniotomy for shortening spontaneous labour. Cochrane Database of Systema-tic Reviews 2007, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD006167. The Cochrane Collaboration, currently published in The Cochrane Database of Sys-tematic Reviews 2011 Issue 6, Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration.
  6. 6. Howarth G, Botha DJ. Amniotomy plus intravenous oxytocin for induction of labour. Cochrane Database of Syste-matic Reviews 2001, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD003250. The Cochrane Collaboration, currently published in The Cochrane Database ofSystematic Reviews 2011 Issue 6, Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration.
  7. 7. Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM, Pileggi C. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 10. Art. No.: CD000941. The Cochrane Database of SystematicReviews 2011 Issue 6, Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration.
  8. 8. Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM, Pileggi C. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 10. Art. No.: CD000941. The Cochrane Database of SystematicReviews 2011 Issue 6, Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration.
  9. 9. Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM, Pileggi C. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 10. Art. No.: CD000941. The Cochrane Database of SystematicReviews 2011 Issue 6, Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration.
  10. 10. Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM, Pileggi C. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 10. Art. No.: CD000941. The Cochrane Database of SystematicReviews 2011 Issue 6, Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration.
  11. 11. Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM, Pileggi C. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 10. Art. No.: CD000941. The Cochrane Database of SystematicReviews 2011 Issue 6, Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration.
  12. 12. Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM, Pileggi C. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 10. Art. No.: CD000941. The Cochrane Database of SystematicReviews 2011 Issue 6, Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration.
  13. 13. Kavanagh J, Kelly AJ, Thomas J. Breast stimulation for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database ofSystematic Reviews 2005, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD003392. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011 Issue 6, Copyright ©2011 The Cochrane Collaboration.
  14. 14. MADRID, 21 Jun.
  15. 15. Embriotoxicidad del misoprostol  Síndrome de MoebiusMisoprostol y teratogenicidad: Revisión de la evidencia. Informe de una reunión organizada por el Population Council NewYork, New York 22 de mayo de 2002. En: http://www.gynuity.org/documents/miso_terat_sp.pdf.Osorio A, y col. Embriopatías asociadas al uso de misoprostol. Casos Clínicos. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol ©2007;72(5):346-351.
  16. 16. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment Number 176. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. March 2009.
  17. 17. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment Number 176. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. March 2009.
  18. 18. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment Number 176. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. March 2009.
  19. 19. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment Number 176. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. March 2009.
  20. 20. EAC OR 95% CI P Ingreso a la UCIN 3 1.24 0.73 – 2.09 0.43 Muerte neonatal 6* – – – Sólo cuatro muertes neonatales en el grupo de conducta expectante y no hubo en el de inducción electiva.Evidence Report/Technology Assessment Number 176. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. March 2009.
  21. 21. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment Number 176. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. March 2009.
  22. 22. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment Number 176. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. March 2009.
  23. 23. .
  24. 24. Bahn SA, Jacobson J, Petersen F(Obstet Gynecol. ©1998 Sep;92(3):403-7)
  25. 25. Bahn SA, Jacobson J, Petersen F(Obstet Gynecol. ©1998 Sep;92(3):403-7)
  26. 26. Todos somos muy ignorantes.Lo que ocurre es que no todosignoramos las mismas cosas.

×