Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

2010 Ohmi Users Group And Ogrip

483 views

Published on

A presentation of the Ohio Department of Transportation, District 2 Video Asset Collection platform. Given to the Souther Michigan, North Western Ohio Users Group and OGRIP.

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

2010 Ohmi Users Group And Ogrip

  1. 1. ODOT District 2’s Video Asset Application A Presentation for OGRIP
  2. 2. Ohio Department of Transportation District Two John Puente District 1 GIS Coordinator Planning Administrator ODOT District 1 and 2, GIS
  3. 3. Ohio Department of Transportation District Two <ul><li>What Quantity? </li></ul><ul><li>Where Is It? </li></ul><ul><li>How Old Is It? </li></ul><ul><li>How Many Times Have We Performed Maintenance To It? </li></ul><ul><li>What Is Its Life Expectancy? </li></ul>Asset Problem
  4. 4. Ohio Department of Transportation District Two <ul><li>Multiple Data Formats </li></ul><ul><li>No Standardizations Localized Standards </li></ul><ul><li>Log Point As Primary Spatial Reference </li></ul><ul><ul><li>1 mi = 5280 ft Most Locations Carried To .01 = At +/- 52.8’ </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Average Error In Log Point +/- 300 ft. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Mile Marker Signs Would Be Placed Wrong </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Mile Marker Signs Would Not Be Recorded Correctly </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Locations Recorded By Multiple Methods </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Landmark, County Log Point, State Log Point And Intersection </li></ul></ul></ul>Asset Collection - Data
  5. 5. Ohio Department of Transportation District Two <ul><li>Typically assets were collected via paper and pencil. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Sometimes entered into the computer. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Most of the time referenced to mile markers and landmarks. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>2 nd Most common location referencing method is by GPS. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Requires Specialized Equipment And Software </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Requires Logistical Planning </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Compounding Deadhead Times For Complete Coverage </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Requires Specialized Training </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Subject To Weather Conditions </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Increased Safety Risk To Field Crews And Public </li></ul></ul>Asset Collection - Devices
  6. 6. Ohio Department of Transportation District Two <ul><li>Satellite Imagery </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Some Free </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Good Stuff Costs Big $$$ </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Most does not meet our resolution needs. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Limited By Weather </li></ul></ul><ul><li>LIDAR </li></ul><ul><ul><li>OSIP LIDAR Very Accurate </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>1 Meter spacing did not meet our resolution needs. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Freely Available </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Oblique Aerial Imagery </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Most does not meet our resolution needs. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Expensive </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Orthorectified Aerial Imagery </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Most does not meet our resolution needs. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Frequency of coverage is dependant of source. </li></ul></ul>Remote Sensing Methods
  7. 7. Ohio Department of Transportation District Two <ul><li>Video Log as a remote sensing method for asset inventories. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Good Update Frequency </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Established Internal Business Process </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Cheap To Implement </li></ul></ul><ul><li>ODOT Video Log </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Occurs Every 3-6 Years </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Process Is In Place </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Possible to project coordinates into image. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The van has a GPS. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>We did not have software to accomplish our needs. </li></ul></ul>Remote Sensing Methods ODOT Video Log
  8. 8. Ohio Department of Transportation District Two <ul><li>Some were not user friendly. </li></ul><ul><li>Some had poor locational accuracy. </li></ul><ul><li>Some did not even know their own camera configuration. </li></ul><ul><li>All were too expensive for the district. </li></ul>Video Log Vendor Evaluation
  9. 9. Ohio Department of Transportation District Two Example - Video Vehicles
  10. 10. Ohio Department of Transportation District Two <ul><li>Central Office pilot of pathway services with advanced video features. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>District 2 Acted In A Support Roll </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Routes Were Driven In July And August </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Asset Capture Program Was Evaluated </li></ul></ul>Video Log Vendor Evaluation
  11. 11. Ohio Department of Transportation District Two <ul><li>District 2 Evaluated the Asset Capture Portion </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Software was not user friendly. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Built mostly on third party applications. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Software required us to ask the vendor every time we wanted to add or change assets. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Not scalable enough for the district needs. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Does not display assets after capture. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Pathways is currently working with Central Office to update their software platform. </li></ul>Video Log Vendor Evaluation
  12. 12. Ohio Department of Transportation District Two Solution – Build Our Own Asset Capture Software
  13. 13. Ohio Department of Transportation District Two <ul><li>Web Based For Scalability </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Throughout District Office 1 And 2, And County Garages </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Partnership with District 1 </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Flexible </li></ul><ul><ul><li>We can add delete or change any asset any time. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Independent From Any Vendor </li></ul><ul><ul><li>We will be able to use this with any video vendors’ image. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>User Friendly </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Asset collection is accomplished by a few clicks. </li></ul></ul>Software Requirements
  14. 14. Ohio Department of Transportation District Two Overall GIS Management Model for Asset Management
  15. 15. Ohio Department of Transportation District Two GPS GUI Video Log GUI Web Mapping GUI (Proposed) ARCServer Standard Interface
  16. 16. Ohio Department of Transportation District Two Asset Management Application
  17. 17. Ohio Department of Transportation District Two Mobile Video Asset Capturing Application
  18. 18. Ohio Department of Transportation District Two Mobile Video Asset Capturing Application
  19. 19. Ohio Department of Transportation District Two <ul><li>Issue </li></ul><ul><ul><li>We were not sure of the camera configurations for the different video cycles. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>We attempted to measure everything our selves and found that we could not be accurate enough. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Solution </li></ul><ul><ul><li>By manipulating Tao’s equations and coming up with a few of our own we were able to develop methods to develop a configuration for each video cycle. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Uses the imagery with known points and measurements to calibrate. </li></ul></ul>Image Calibrations
  20. 20. Ohio Department of Transportation District Two Image Calibrations
  21. 21. Ohio Department of Transportation District Two <ul><li>We not only achieved our goals but exceeded them. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Uses the latest in web technologies – Microsoft Silverlight. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>No install, Available To Everyone In ODOT </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Same programming as our proposed web mapping application being built on ARCServer and Silverlight. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Easy interface, 5 clicks to store a asset. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Data instantly stored in the District’s spatial databases. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Vendor Independent </li></ul></ul>Summary
  22. 22. Ohio Department of Transportation District Two <ul><li>Automated Reporting </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Add a image to any asset report. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Knowing the image’s GPS and projecting the lat and lon into the image. </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Optional Vertical Offset </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Specify Length and Width </li></ul></ul></ul>Future
  23. 23. Ohio Department of Transportation District Two <ul><li>Modified Navigational GPS Units </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Using the video log as a car Navigational GPS unit. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Assets would be displayed as the vehicle approaches them. </li></ul></ul>Future
  24. 24. Ohio Department of Transportation District Two <ul><li>Augmented Reality </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Using the video camera as a backdrop we can project the assets into the video using the same equations. </li></ul></ul>Future

×