Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Disseminating
your research
Scientific profiles
and tools
Nicolás Robinson-García
@nrobinsongarcia
2nd IMPRESS Workshop, M...
THEORY
o Databases and scientific visibility
o Open Access and online visibility
o Digital identity and reputation
DEMOS
o...
Databases and
scientific visibility
2nd IMPRESS Workshop, March 2, 2016
o Scientific names
o Scientific profiles – ORCID &...
Sign your papers consistently
This means avoiding name variants and making it easy for
others to find you
Especially relev...
Recommendations
o Always sign in the same format
o Use your full given name, no need for initials!
o Use hyphens if you ha...
Scientific profiles
Identifying researchers uniquely is a big issue
for researchers, funding agencies, publishers
and univ...
How much does it cost others to find your
work?
Scientific visibility
How much does it cost others to find your
work?
Scientific visibility
How much does it cost others to find your
work?
Scientific visibility
Even if we hate them we should learn about
bibliometric indicators to know their meaning and
limitations as we will be ask...
H-Index
An author has an h index when h of
their papers has at least h citations
Journal Impact Factor
The Journal Impact Factor is not a good proxy of the
expected impact of papers published in such jou...
Web of Science
Citations and usage
Citations reports
Web of Science
Article level
Scopus
Scopus
Researcher profile
Google Scholar Citations
Indicators
Fields
Alerts
References
Citations
Open Access and
online visibility
2nd IMPRESS Workshop, March 2, 2016
o Main milestones of the OA movement
o The roads to ...
A few publishers control an
increasingly higher share of
‘elite’ journals
The problem
THERE IS SOMETHING WRONG WITH THE PU...
o Publishers impose their own collections
o Abusive increases on pricing, up to 20%
o Libraries acquire journals that are ...
Government funds research
Researchers publish
their results
in peer reviewed
scientific journals
Publishers edit
these pap...
1991 - Paul Ginsparg launches ARXIV
The alternative
2002 - Budapest Open Access Initiative
2002 - Doris Lessig develops th...
Government funds research
Researchers publish
their results
in peer reviewed
scientific journals
Publishers edit
these pap...
The revolution
The key to all these issues is the right of authors to achieve easily-
accessible distribution of their work. If you would...
We need to download scientific journals
and upload them to file sharing networks.
We need to fight for Guerilla Open Acces...
Robin Hoods of Science
Alexandra
Elbakyan
Recommendation on access to and
preservation of scientific information
States that “Policies on open access to scientific ...
GREEN
ROAD
GOLD
ROAD
The Roads to OA
Self-archiving Journals
The Roads to OA
The author is responsible of
ensuring open and free universal
to its work
WEBSITE REPOSITORY
A repository, deposit or archive is a centralized
place where digital information is stored and
preserved, normally databa...
The Roads to OA
Benefits of repositories
o They ensure universal and permanent access
o They use metadata to describe cont...
Peer
Review
Accepted for
publication
Published
version
PRE
PRINT
POST
PRINT
PUBLISHER
VERSION
SUBMIT
TO
JOURNAL
The Roads ...
Personal Website Repository+
The Roads to OA
My advice:
The Roads to OA
OPEN
ACCESS
HYBRID
MODEL
FULL
OPEN
ACCESS
OPEN
ACCESS
AUTHOR
PAYS
Models of Open Access journals
Author pays model
JOURNAL Euros per article Articles 2010 Benefits 2010
Genome Biology (BMC) 1.800 € 155 279.000 €
Breast ...
The Roads to OA
Who’s Afraid of Peer Review?
Bohannon, Science, 2014
Some reflections
BEWARE!
OA journals ≠ Predatory journals
The Google scholar experiment
Delgado, Robinson & Torres-Salinas, JASIST, 2014
Some reflections
BEWARE!
Things are not alw...
Digital identity
and reputation
2nd IMPRESS Workshop, March 2, 2016
o From scientific to digital reputation
o Reputation a...
Going digital
The two worlds
Going digital
The two audiences
The web as a
scholarly
communication
tool
Publishing as a
scientific
communication
tool
Th...
Going digital
Reasons for disseminating research
o Social outreach
o Influencing public opinion
o Self-presentation
HOWEVER…
One cannot have a digital scientific
reputation if they have no previous
scientific reputation
Going digital
Going digital
Digital reputation
A
Digital
Identity
B
What they
say about
us
C
Positioning
Going digital
Digital Identity What they say about us Positioning
Our on-line reputation is build upon
our off-line scientific reputation
Internet does not forget, science does not forgive...
WHO DO YOU WANT TO BE?
Building a digital identity
Type of profile
Speaker
Researcher
Innovative
Miscellaneous
Channel
Web...
WHO DO YOU WANT TO BE?
Building a digital identity
Audience
Audience – ej. journalists
Community – ej. country
Contacts – ...
Paco Herrera
Science communication
Selective audience
Facebook
Informal style
Ismael Rafols
Science communication
Internat...
Some examples…
http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2016/01/25/how-to-write-a-blogpost-from-your-journal-article/
Demos:
How-to guides
2nd IMPRESS Workshop, March 2, 2016
o Depositing a paper in a repository
o Dealing with complementary...
Depositing a paper
1) Analyze the OA policy of your journal
2) Choose a repository
3) Prepare the post-print: elements
4) ...
Depositing a paper
OA journals’ policies
Journal’s website
Sherpa/Romeo - Dulcinea
Repository
Institutional - Thematic
Pos...
1) Analyze the journal’s policy
2) What do you want to share?
data vs. material
3) Choose a repository
4) Deposit!!
Comple...
Data policy of a journal
Journal’s website
Complementary material vs. datasets
Material – Data set
Where do I deposit the ...
1) Deposit in a repository
2) Link from your website
3) Tweet, blog, spread the word
Visible research
1) Create a profile in Google Scholar
2) Add new publications
3) Manage your publications
4) Create citation alerts
Managi...
o Open-source reference manager
o Easy to import records from the website
o Nice citation options
o Powerful syncing
Manag...
o Free reference manager
o Easy and powerful reading tool
o It is also social network
o Collaborating options available
Ma...
BASIC TOOLS
1) OA policies-> Sherpa/Romeo – Dulcinea
2) Repositories -> ArXiV – Digibug
3) Data -> Figshare
4) Managing sc...
Acknowledgements
Much of the content and ideas included in this presentation are not my own, but
are borrowed from other t...
Disseminating
your research
Scientific profiles
and tools
2nd IMPRESS Workshop, March 2, 2016
elrobin@ingenio.upv.es
@nrob...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Disseminating your research: Scientific profiles and tools

942 views

Published on

Talk given in the 2nd IMPRESS Workshop celebrated in Valencia in March 2, 2016.

Published in: Economy & Finance
  • Be the first to comment

Disseminating your research: Scientific profiles and tools

  1. 1. Disseminating your research Scientific profiles and tools Nicolás Robinson-García @nrobinsongarcia 2nd IMPRESS Workshop, March 2, 2016
  2. 2. THEORY o Databases and scientific visibility o Open Access and online visibility o Digital identity and reputation DEMOS o How-to guide: tools for disseminating scientific papers (repositories, Google Scholar & reference managers) Agenda
  3. 3. Databases and scientific visibility 2nd IMPRESS Workshop, March 2, 2016 o Scientific names o Scientific profiles – ORCID & ResearcherID o Web of Science and Scopus – Indicators o Google Scholar Citations Profiles
  4. 4. Sign your papers consistently This means avoiding name variants and making it easy for others to find you Especially relevant if you have more than one surname Scientific names
  5. 5. Recommendations o Always sign in the same format o Use your full given name, no need for initials! o Use hyphens if you have two surnames o If you can choose between different scientific names, use the most uncommon one o Correct any error you may find in a database Scientific name
  6. 6. Scientific profiles Identifying researchers uniquely is a big issue for researchers, funding agencies, publishers and universities
  7. 7. How much does it cost others to find your work? Scientific visibility
  8. 8. How much does it cost others to find your work? Scientific visibility
  9. 9. How much does it cost others to find your work? Scientific visibility
  10. 10. Even if we hate them we should learn about bibliometric indicators to know their meaning and limitations as we will be asked to provide them at some point. Bibliometric indicators
  11. 11. H-Index An author has an h index when h of their papers has at least h citations
  12. 12. Journal Impact Factor The Journal Impact Factor is not a good proxy of the expected impact of papers published in such journal Total number of citations received in year X by papers published in a journal in years X-1 and X-2 Total number of paper published in a journal in years X-1 and X-2
  13. 13. Web of Science Citations and usage
  14. 14. Citations reports Web of Science
  15. 15. Article level Scopus
  16. 16. Scopus Researcher profile
  17. 17. Google Scholar Citations Indicators Fields Alerts References Citations
  18. 18. Open Access and online visibility 2nd IMPRESS Workshop, March 2, 2016 o Main milestones of the OA movement o The roads to Open Access o Some reflections on Open Access and Scholarly Communication
  19. 19. A few publishers control an increasingly higher share of ‘elite’ journals The problem THERE IS SOMETHING WRONG WITH THE PUBLISHING SYSTEM… Which they sell to academic institutions through a ‘big deal’ strategy
  20. 20. o Publishers impose their own collections o Abusive increases on pricing, up to 20% o Libraries acquire journals that are never used The problem … ALL OF THIS LEADS TO THE BEGINNING OF THE OPEN ACCESS
  21. 21. Government funds research Researchers publish their results in peer reviewed scientific journals Publishers edit these papers and sell them back to them through libraries Researchers access their papers through suscription The paradox
  22. 22. 1991 - Paul Ginsparg launches ARXIV The alternative 2002 - Budapest Open Access Initiative 2002 - Doris Lessig develops the Creative Commons licenses
  23. 23. Government funds research Researchers publish their results in peer reviewed scientific journals Publishers edit these papers and sell them back to them through libraries THIS ARE OFFERED IN OPEN ACCESS GRATIS Researchers access their papers through suscription Researchers publish their papers in journals or repositories The alternative
  24. 24. The revolution
  25. 25. The key to all these issues is the right of authors to achieve easily- accessible distribution of their work. If you would like to declare publicly that you will not support any Elsevier journal unless they radically change how they operate… THE COST OF KNOWLEDGE 2013 The revolution
  26. 26. We need to download scientific journals and upload them to file sharing networks. We need to fight for Guerilla Open Acces Swartz † 1986-2013 Robin Hoods of Science
  27. 27. Robin Hoods of Science Alexandra Elbakyan
  28. 28. Recommendation on access to and preservation of scientific information States that “Policies on open access to scientific research results should apply to all research that receives public funds. EU Open Access policy Implementing OA
  29. 29. GREEN ROAD GOLD ROAD The Roads to OA Self-archiving Journals
  30. 30. The Roads to OA The author is responsible of ensuring open and free universal to its work WEBSITE REPOSITORY
  31. 31. A repository, deposit or archive is a centralized place where digital information is stored and preserved, normally databases or digital files • Institutional • Thematic • Articles • Data The Roads to OA
  32. 32. The Roads to OA Benefits of repositories o They ensure universal and permanent access o They use metadata to describe content and make it easier for research engines to find it o They use permanent URLs that ensure sustainability of hyperlinks.
  33. 33. Peer Review Accepted for publication Published version PRE PRINT POST PRINT PUBLISHER VERSION SUBMIT TO JOURNAL The Roads to OA
  34. 34. Personal Website Repository+ The Roads to OA My advice:
  35. 35. The Roads to OA OPEN ACCESS HYBRID MODEL FULL OPEN ACCESS OPEN ACCESS AUTHOR PAYS Models of Open Access journals
  36. 36. Author pays model JOURNAL Euros per article Articles 2010 Benefits 2010 Genome Biology (BMC) 1.800 € 155 279.000 € Breast Cancer Res. (BMC) 1.345 € 138 185.610 € PLoS One 987 € 6.690 6.603.030 € PLoS Medicine 2.120 € 85 180.200 € Hybrid Model: British Medical Journal>2.500 € The Roads to OA
  37. 37. The Roads to OA
  38. 38. Who’s Afraid of Peer Review? Bohannon, Science, 2014 Some reflections BEWARE! OA journals ≠ Predatory journals
  39. 39. The Google scholar experiment Delgado, Robinson & Torres-Salinas, JASIST, 2014 Some reflections BEWARE! Things are not always what they look like
  40. 40. Digital identity and reputation 2nd IMPRESS Workshop, March 2, 2016 o From scientific to digital reputation o Reputation and misconduct o Building a digital identity
  41. 41. Going digital The two worlds
  42. 42. Going digital The two audiences The web as a scholarly communication tool Publishing as a scientific communication tool The world The scientists
  43. 43. Going digital Reasons for disseminating research o Social outreach o Influencing public opinion o Self-presentation
  44. 44. HOWEVER… One cannot have a digital scientific reputation if they have no previous scientific reputation Going digital
  45. 45. Going digital Digital reputation A Digital Identity B What they say about us C Positioning
  46. 46. Going digital Digital Identity What they say about us Positioning
  47. 47. Our on-line reputation is build upon our off-line scientific reputation Internet does not forget, science does not forgive Build first your scientific reputation with papers acknowledged by your community, then you can start to work on your on-line reputation Do not try to earn an on-line reputation dishonestly or with strategies from other sectors IT IS YOUR CONTRIBUTION TO SCIENCE THE STORY YOU HAVE TO TELL THROUGH THE INTERNET Reputation & misconduct
  48. 48. WHO DO YOU WANT TO BE? Building a digital identity Type of profile Speaker Researcher Innovative Miscellaneous Channel Web Blogs Networks …there are hundreds of tools… Style Formal vs Informal Scientific vs Personal Misc.
  49. 49. WHO DO YOU WANT TO BE? Building a digital identity Audience Audience – ej. journalists Community – ej. country Contacts – ej. selective Objective Dissemination of publications Discuss results Alert Share resources
  50. 50. Paco Herrera Science communication Selective audience Facebook Informal style Ismael Rafols Science communication International audience Institutional blogs Formal style Daniel Torres Professional + Sci comm National audience Twitter Informal style Some examples…
  51. 51. Some examples… http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2016/01/25/how-to-write-a-blogpost-from-your-journal-article/
  52. 52. Demos: How-to guides 2nd IMPRESS Workshop, March 2, 2016 o Depositing a paper in a repository o Dealing with complementary material and data sets o Making your research visible o Managing scientific information
  53. 53. Depositing a paper 1) Analyze the OA policy of your journal 2) Choose a repository 3) Prepare the post-print: elements 4) Deposit!!
  54. 54. Depositing a paper OA journals’ policies Journal’s website Sherpa/Romeo - Dulcinea Repository Institutional - Thematic Post-print Elements
  55. 55. 1) Analyze the journal’s policy 2) What do you want to share? data vs. material 3) Choose a repository 4) Deposit!! Complementary material
  56. 56. Data policy of a journal Journal’s website Complementary material vs. datasets Material – Data set Where do I deposit the data Repository - Databank Complementary material
  57. 57. 1) Deposit in a repository 2) Link from your website 3) Tweet, blog, spread the word Visible research
  58. 58. 1) Create a profile in Google Scholar 2) Add new publications 3) Manage your publications 4) Create citation alerts Managing sci information
  59. 59. o Open-source reference manager o Easy to import records from the website o Nice citation options o Powerful syncing Managing sci information
  60. 60. o Free reference manager o Easy and powerful reading tool o It is also social network o Collaborating options available Managing sci information
  61. 61. BASIC TOOLS 1) OA policies-> Sherpa/Romeo – Dulcinea 2) Repositories -> ArXiV – Digibug 3) Data -> Figshare 4) Managing scientific data-> Google Scholar, Zotero and Mendeley Wrapping up
  62. 62. Acknowledgements Much of the content and ideas included in this presentation are not my own, but are borrowed from other talks given in collaboration with Daniel Torres-Salinas. elrobin@ingenio.upv.es @nrobinsongarcia 2nd IMPRESS Workshop, March 2, 2016 Questions?
  63. 63. Disseminating your research Scientific profiles and tools 2nd IMPRESS Workshop, March 2, 2016 elrobin@ingenio.upv.es @nrobinsongarcia

×