1.
Fairfax County Board of Supervisors
Transportation Committee
May 19, 2015
1

2.
Identifying the Best Solution
2
Universe of
Alternatives for
Roadways and
Interchanges
Environmental Draft
Alternative 2A
Environmental Draft
Alternative 2B
Preferred Alternative
(combination of best
elements from each
alternative)
Transit, Park and Ride Lots, and TDM
Mainline Alternatives Access Alternatives Interchange Alternatives
Public Input

3.
Public Outreach & Agency
Coordination
3
• More than 119 outreach meetings to date
• Public notification and briefings prior to
NEPA Public Hearings with:
o Direct-impact homeowner associations
o Key stakeholder groups
o Northern Va. Congressional Delegation
o General Assembly members
o Local officials
o Transportation groups
• Proactive media engagement
• Transform66.org and interactive
community discussion board
• Transform66@VDOT.Virginia.gov –
More than 1,000 emails received
• Email updates
• Responding to public inquiries

4.
Preliminary Concepts
Dunn Loring Area – Alternative 2B
4

5.
5
Preliminary Concepts
Dunn Loring Area – Alternative 2B
Preliminary Concepts
Dunn Loring Metro Area
Alternative2A/2B

6.
Preliminary Concepts
I-66/I-495 Interchange - Alternative 2A
4

7.
5
Preliminary Concepts
I-66/I-495 Interchange
Alternative 2A

8.
8
Preliminary Concepts
Cedar Lane Overpass Area – Alternative 2A/2B

9.
9
Preliminary Concepts
Cedar Lane Overpass Area – Alternative 2A/2B

10.
10
Preliminary Concepts
Chain Bridge (Route 123) Interchange Area
Alternative 2B

11.
11
Preliminary Concepts
Chain Bridge (Route 123)
Interchange Area
Alternative 2B

12.
Preliminary Right of Way Impacts
6
Project Goal: Minimize the project footprint, while determining the most
effective and viable solutions for the I-66 Corridor
WORK IN PROGRESS

13.
Moving More People
7

14.
12
• Enhance bicycle network in Fairfax and Prince William Counties:
o New crossings of I-66 would better accommodate bicycle and pedestrians, connect
routes
o Project may potentially construct links of bicycle trails parallel to I-66
Expand Mode Choices and Transit
Options
Jermantown Road

15.
NEPA Status
Overview of Environmental Impacts
15

16.
Origin of Traffic Traveling
Eastbound I-66 to
Eastern end of the corridor
16
Source: 2015 I-66 Travel Demand Model using MWCOG version 2.3 and Round 8.3 Land Use Forecasts
Upstream Segment
Analysis Segment
Downstream Segment

17.
Destination of Traffic Traveling
Westbound I-66 from
Eastern end of the corridor
17
Source: 2015 I-66 Travel Demand Model using MWCOG version 2.3 and Round 8.3 Land Use Forecasts
Upstream Segment
Analysis Segment
Downstream Segment

18.
18
Improve Speeds Along Corridor – Morning Peak Period
Comparison of Existing, 2040 No-Build, and Build General Purpose Lanes
Existing
2014
No Build
2040
Build 2A
2040
Build 2B
2040

19.
19
Improve Speeds Along Corridor – Afternoon/Evening Peak Period
Comparison of Existing, 2040 No-Build, and Build General Purpose Lanes
Existing
2014
No Build
2040
Build 2A
2040
Build 2B
2040

20.
Key Milestones
8

21.
Public Outreach
Public Hearings
Meetings at 5:30-9:00 p.m.; Presentation at 7 p.m.
• Wednesday, May 27, 2015
• VDOT Northern Virginia District, Fairfax, VA
• Thursday, May 28, 2015
• Oakton High School, Vienna, VA
• Tuesday, June 2, 2015
• Battlefield High School, Haymarket, VA
• Wednesday, June 3, 2015
• Bull Run Elementary School, Centreville, VA
9

22.
How to Provide Input on
Environmental Assessment
17
• Draft Environmental Assessment and Draft
Section 4(f) Evaluation and other materials
posted on project website:
www.transform66.org on May 12, 2015
• Comments can be provided at:
• Public Hearings via comment form or
court reporter
• Emailed to
Transform66@VDOT.Virginia.gov
• Mailed to VDOT District Office to
Ms. Susan Shaw
• Comments must be received by
June 18, 2015
• Comments will be used to help frame a
preferred alternative.
• All substantive comments will be
addressed in a Revised Environmental
Assessment

23.
For More Information
Visit
Transform66.org
10